Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
KB3001
User Rank
Author
re: Nvidia quit PC benchmarking consortium, too
KB3001   8/13/2011 11:15:24 AM
NO RATINGS
Leave Benchmarks setting to independent Academics!

fdunn0
User Rank
Author
re: Nvidia quit PC benchmarking consortium, too
fdunn0   6/28/2011 11:31:43 PM
NO RATINGS
SysMark has ALWAYS been Intel extension specific and the results ALWAYS showed the same. Well I guess SysMark can differentiate Intel platforms but that is about it. SysMark has made it's product meaningless.

goafrit
User Rank
Author
re: Nvidia quit PC benchmarking consortium, too
goafrit   6/27/2011 2:48:25 AM
NO RATINGS
Bapco will not get a high level competitor. This is too bad for them. Nvidia and AMD can make this work. But yet Intel is still in business. You cannot run away from Intel.

kdboyce
User Rank
Author
re: Nvidia quit PC benchmarking consortium, too
kdboyce   6/26/2011 4:07:30 AM
NO RATINGS
Assuming the AMD accusation bobbytsai refers to is correct, BAPCo brought this on themselves. It would be up to AMD to makes its case, but undoubtedly there is enough of a problem to cause Nvidia to bow out as well. A problem with ceding power to someone else is that the someone else no longer has to take you into consideration; they tend to do what they want and for the reasons they want. Independent arbitrators of performance of anything ONLY have value if they are truly independent. The biggest problem is proving the true independence. AMD would be in better control of their destiny by devising their own set of performance metrics which would show off their superiority (if any) and challenge anyone to prove otherwise.

bobbytsai
User Rank
Author
re: Nvidia quit PC benchmarking consortium, too
bobbytsai   6/24/2011 5:08:22 PM
NO RATINGS
"Previously AMD simply accused BAPCo of using Intel-optimized software (compilers and cpuid specific optimizations) within the test suite." Issues with fairness on just CPU benchmarking. A benchmark without OPENCL, CUDA, GPGPU, GPU accleration or DirectCompute for 2012 is pretty much useless. Flash, IE9, Windows 7, FF4, Adobe *. Its hard to find applications that don't use gpu acceleration.

mcgrathdylan
User Rank
Author
re: Nvidia quit PC benchmarking consortium, too
mcgrathdylan   6/24/2011 12:22:03 PM
NO RATINGS
Here is BAPCo's description of SYSmark 2012. http://www.bapco.com/support/sysmark2012/sm2012_Help/license/benchmarking_rules.html As I understand it, it is a way to quantify how a system performs running a set of common softwae applications. I imagine there are plenty of things that participating companies may disagree about in such an undertaking. Obviously each company would push for things it thinks favors their hardware. Will the benchmark be meaningful without AMD and Nvidia? I really don't know how it will be received without their participation. It will be interesting to see how this plays out.

Neo10
User Rank
Author
re: Nvidia quit PC benchmarking consortium, too
Neo10   6/24/2011 3:31:59 AM
NO RATINGS
So, the arm twisting continues even in seemingly independent consortiums. What is not obvious here is what this SysMark2012 contains and why AMD is not happy about it. So if AMD and Nvidia exit the forum the becnmarks will not be any more meaningful, right?

mcgrathdylan
User Rank
Author
re: Nvidia quit PC benchmarking consortium, too
mcgrathdylan   6/24/2011 3:15:50 AM
NO RATINGS
Not sure if AMD and Nvidia will join forces, but it's certainly a possibility. Interesting how while AMD trumpeted it's departure and issued a statement in an attempt to discredit BAPCo, Nvidia quietly walked away and didn't want to discuss it.

Sanjib.A
User Rank
Author
re: Nvidia quit PC benchmarking consortium, too
Sanjib.A   6/24/2011 2:56:49 AM
NO RATINGS
So, it looks like Nvidia along with some others might join with AMD to get associated with BAPco's rival consortium. This increases my suspicion about the major rivals of Intel, such as AMD smelling biasness of BAPco towards Intel...possible?



Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST

What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.

Brought to you by:

Most Recent Comments
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
The LTC2380-24 is a versatile 24-bit SAR ADC that combines ...
In this short video we show an LED light demo to ...
02:46
Wireless Power enables applications where it is difficult ...
07:41
LEDs are being used in current luxury model automotive ...
With design sizes expected to increase by 5X through 2020, ...
01:48
Linear Technology’s LT8330 and LT8331, two Low Quiescent ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
05:27
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
05:18
Silego Technology’s highly versatile Mixed-signal GreenPAK ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
See the Virtex® UltraScale+™ FPGA with 32.75G backplane ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...