Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
dleske
User Rank
Rookie
re: House passes patent reform bill
dleske   7/14/2011 9:56:27 AM
NO RATINGS
Whether your jurisdiction is "First to Invent" (USA) or "First to File" (rest of world), patentability still requires Novelty and Non-Obviousness. This should prevent patents being issued for techniques which are already in use and on sale. I do think it is good to strengthen provisions for challenging bad patents. This can help ease the tension between trying to rush patent processing (to reduce the backlog) and issuing junk patents. Remember that the origin of 'Letters Patent' was _not_ fairness to inventors, but was to advance the State of the Art by giving inventors incentive to publish (in return for a limited period of exclusive license), rather than retaining new ideas as Trade Secrets.

KB3001
User Rank
CEO
re: House passes patent reform bill
KB3001   7/3/2011 6:39:12 PM
NO RATINGS
I agree James. I think this move favours big businesses.

KB3001
User Rank
CEO
re: House passes patent reform bill
KB3001   7/3/2011 6:37:22 PM
NO RATINGS
I am not sure that is always the case. If companies want to move fast, they would as they have the resources to do it. I have always been a fan of first-to-invent.

parity
User Rank
Rookie
re: House passes patent reform bill
parity   7/1/2011 3:03:41 PM
NO RATINGS
If reason stands here, the first to commercially use a technology might apply to Company A who had been using the tech to build widgets, perhaps keeping it as a trade secret, after which Company B later re-discovers the tech and files for a patent. At that point, Company A would be held harmless for infringement and licensing ???? OTOH, it might be meant to prevent trolls from patenting some technique that everyone in the industry thought was obvious and did not merit a patent.

ahshabazz
User Rank
Rookie
re: House passes patent reform bill
ahshabazz   7/1/2011 9:50:34 AM
NO RATINGS
Amendment 10 (The actual First-to-file clause), which was brought to the floor by MI-Rep., J. Conyers, was successfully voted down after being declared out-of-order because a member had not been recognized in the Well. This was the heart of the Bill. I'm not sure aspects of this article are correct.

dick_myers
User Rank
Rookie
re: House passes patent reform bill
dick_myers   6/30/2011 6:06:14 PM
NO RATINGS
Oh great. With the patent "reform", if I'm selling a product and some aspect of it is patented by the coming new breed of patent trolls, then I could end up paying to sell my own design! This is also terrible for the little guy who doesn't have the resources to churn out patents.

Code Monkey
User Rank
Rookie
re: House passes patent reform bill
Code Monkey   6/30/2011 4:30:27 PM
NO RATINGS
With "a vote of 304-117", it looks like the patent reform bill is a done deal. I blame the trolls. Now all we need is Congress reform.

Robotics Developer
User Rank
Rookie
re: House passes patent reform bill
Robotics Developer   6/28/2011 1:12:53 AM
NO RATINGS
It would seem the best thing to do is to file, file, and file. File early and often just to make sure. I am wondering about the first to use clause the article talked about. How would that work? If I patent an idea but someone else then brings it to market do I lose the patent, do they get rights to use MY patent. Just wondering... I did hear from a patent attorney earlier last week who said that "first to file" may make it easier (lower cost) to protect ideas as it prevents lawsuits over "who came up with the idea first". Still not too sure but time will tell, the devil is in the details...

JamesJD3
User Rank
Rookie
re: House passes patent reform bill
JamesJD3   6/27/2011 7:09:48 AM
NO RATINGS
This first to file thing seems to be very bad for small businesses. Instead of writing papers and bringing products to market, I must now file patents on every invention. Do I understand this correctly? Even if I publish or have a witnessed signed notebook, someone that files a patent can prevent me from using my invention. I can’t afford to patent every invention I have. James Donald

Sanjib.A
User Rank
CEO
re: House passes patent reform bill
Sanjib.A   6/26/2011 12:07:17 PM
NO RATINGS
Thank you Rick!

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Steve Wozniak Reacts to Latest iPhone
Max Maxfield
5 comments
Funnily enough, just a few days ago as I pen these words, I was chatting with my wife (Gina the Gorgeous) when she informed me that -- as a kid -- she had never played at making a ...

EDN Staff

11 Summer Vacation Spots for Engineers
EDN Staff
20 comments
This collection of places from technology history, museums, and modern marvels is a roadmap for an engineering adventure that will take you around the world. Here are just a few spots ...

Glen Chenier

Engineers Solve Analog/Digital Problem, Invent Creative Expletives
Glen Chenier
15 comments
- An analog engineer and a digital engineer join forces, use their respective skills, and pull a few bunnies out of a hat to troubleshoot a system with which they are completely ...

Larry Desjardin

Engineers Should Study Finance: 5 Reasons Why
Larry Desjardin
46 comments
I'm a big proponent of engineers learning financial basics. Why? Because engineers are making decisions all the time, in multiple ways. Having a good financial understanding guides these ...

Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)