Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 3   >   >>
slomobile
User Rank
Author
re: GPS an unreasonable search?
slomobile   6/29/2011 11:38:24 AM
NO RATINGS
In spirit at least, I feel this practice violates the third amendment. "No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law." At the time this was written soldiers were the primary agents of government in contact with the public, now supplanted by police domestically. I read the 3rd amendment as "Government, stay out of my private life unless you are invited or have a damn good urgent reason and have followed proper procedure(probable cause, warrant, properly served)" The amendment was passed during a time when people feared that a strong central government, while trying to protect the people from tyrants, would become tyrannical itself. The same fear pervades today, only the agency and methods are different.

ndancer
User Rank
Author
re: GPS an unreasonable search?
ndancer   6/28/2011 8:45:19 PM
NO RATINGS
Let me turn it around. If somebody spots one of these stuck on their car, is it legal to remove it? Is it then legal to take it apart, sell it, destroy it, or stick it to somebody elses car?

Mike1234567
User Rank
Author
re: GPS an unreasonable search?
Mike1234567   6/28/2011 8:41:09 PM
NO RATINGS
Without a warrant where does it stop? You open the path to automatic speed limit violations and selective enforcement. Ever watched Fifth Element? Everyone with OnStar can tracked and provide automatic surveillance and ticketing. With GPS they can also issue automatic parking violations.

anon9303122
User Rank
Author
re: GPS an unreasonable search?
anon9303122   6/28/2011 8:01:35 PM
NO RATINGS
But the police can monitor your movements by air, tailing you in a chase vehicle, electronic tolling records, . . . . . Monitoring the location of your vehicle does not amount to a search. I predict the SCOTUS will uphold the use of GPS devices. But then again, I never thought New London would have prevailed over Kelo.

R0ckstar
User Rank
Author
re: GPS an unreasonable search?
R0ckstar   6/28/2011 7:18:04 PM
NO RATINGS
A tracker on a private vehicle driving on private property would definitely require a search warrant. But the same vehicle traveling on public roadways would be considered a grey area by many. My opinion is that the accumulation of any meaningful amount of data from a tracker does in fact constitute a search. At one time, I agreed with Rene. Let the cops do their jobs. But since 9/11, I have since changed my mind. Every piece of legislation that gets passed, every ruling against civil liberties, is just another chip away from the freedoms and privacy we once enjoyed. Today, people can and have been arrested and thrown in jail for nothing more than sleeping in the back seat of their own vehicle parked on their own property. Another ruling against privacy protection would just be a continuation of this trend. The bottom line is that if this guy really is the scumbag they say he is, they would have no trouble obtaining a warrant for the tracker in the first place. It's not "tying their hands", It's part of their job. A certain element of danger & unpredictability is inherent in a free society. The "safer" you make it, the closer you get to a police state.

ReneCardenas
User Rank
Author
re: GPS an unreasonable search?
ReneCardenas   6/28/2011 6:10:52 PM
NO RATINGS
When there is probable cause, why should police have to fight the drug war with hands tied behind their back? As long as there is a reasonable justification, I am all for monitoring those individuals that profit from poisoning our youth! Even at the cost of losing some civil liberties, in the general sense, but my view is that most people that fall in the category of good citizens, we have nothing to worry about.

CliffT
User Rank
Author
re: GPS an unreasonable search?
CliffT   6/28/2011 4:07:28 PM
NO RATINGS
A warrant *is* required to install a surveillance camera or microphone ("bug") on someone's personal property, whether that be their home, car, or private business facility. This is simply investigating the use of tracking devices in the same matters, which I believe falls under the intention of our Fourth Amendment as a "search" -- the founding fathers could never have predicted such a tracking device. It is perfectly legal to install surveillance equipment in a public place as long as it is not intended to infringe on privacy (e.g. pointing it into a neighbor's window). If the police want to stick GPS devices on the sides of public buildings, I'm OK with that. Less jokingly, if they want to place tracking devices on public transit, I think that's acceptable, too. If they want to place them on my property, though, they had better have probable cause and a warrant.

clematis
User Rank
Author
re: GPS an unreasonable search?
clematis   6/28/2011 1:13:44 PM
NO RATINGS
I believe that it should also be required that when surveillance cameras are installed that the area should also be clearly marked with signage stating that the area is under surveillance. After all, we have laws controlling the use of hidden microphones and sound recording devices. Whats the difference between spying on someone with a micorphone or with a hidden camera?

_hm
User Rank
Author
re: GPS an unreasonable search?
_hm   6/28/2011 9:06:44 AM
NO RATINGS
It is similar to installing surveillance Camera or other monitoring techniques. It should be legal and should not require warrant for authority.

kdboyce
User Rank
Author
re: GPS an unreasonable search?
kdboyce   6/28/2011 5:33:04 AM
NO RATINGS
GPS tracking should be treated as requiring a warrant, i.e. sufficient info that would persuade a court to issue the warrant, similar to what is supposed to happen with legal phone taps.

<<   <   Page 2 / 3   >   >>


Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
Overview: Battle-hardened veterans of the electronics industry have heard of the “connected car” so often that they assume it’s a done deal. But do we really know what it takes to get a car connected and what its future entails? Join EE Times editor Junko Yoshida as she moderates a panel of movers and shakers in the connected car business. Executives from Cisco, Siemens and NXP will share ideas, plans and hopes for connected cars and their future. After the first 30 minutes of the radio show, our listeners will have the opportunity to ask questions via live online chat.
Flash Poll
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Special Video Section
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...
General-purpose DACs have applications in instrumentation, ...
Linear Technology demonstrates its latest measurement ...
10:29
Demos from Maxim Integrated at Electronica 2014 show ...
Bosch CEO Stefan Finkbeiner shows off latest combo and ...
STMicroelectronics demoed this simple gesture control ...
Keysight shows you what signals lurk in real-time at 510MHz ...
TE Connectivity's clear-plastic, full-size model car shows ...
Why culture makes Linear Tech a winner.
Recently formed Architects of Modern Power consortium ...
Specially modified Corvette C7 Stingray responds to ex Indy ...