Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 2
nicolas.mokhoff
User Rank
Rookie
re: Setting the record straight on the Intel-TSMC 3-D 'race'
nicolas.mokhoff   7/15/2011 3:04:13 PM
NO RATINGS
michigan: It would be good to point out the IEDM 2010 technical paper numbers you refer to. Perhaps you would like to expand your points in an Opinion piece?

krisi
User Rank
CEO
re: Setting the record straight on the Intel-TSMC 3-D 'race'
krisi   7/15/2011 2:51:24 PM
NO RATINGS
thank you Dylan for straightening this out...I could not made any sense of that report when I read it the first time, but I thought I was just too tired ;-)...Kris

michigan0
User Rank
CEO
re: Setting the record straight on the Intel-TSMC 3-D 'race'
michigan0   7/14/2011 4:39:14 AM
NO RATINGS
I would like to lay out some of the facts about Intel-TSMS FinFETs. TSMC recently published two papers on FinFET CMOS in IEDM, December, 2010, one for high performance 22/20nm and the other for low power 32/28 SoC technology. TSMC reported in both cases a comprehensive data on process, device, SRAM and reliability including their statistical data meaning ready for volume production. TSMC, however, has not announced when it will be manufactured. Intel has not published its FinFET data except mostly news release for public consumption, and not for technical community. This is in contradiction to Intel’s past practices. Intel published new technology nodes such as 65nm, 45nm, and 32nm either in IEDM or in VLSI symposium before production or at the same time except its 22nm FinFET technology. Why? So, we can not compare technically or to see how TSMC chip matches that of Intel because no comparative technical data is provided by Intel. Intel has announced volume production around the end of 2011. It is very unfortunate to claim that TAITRA is not aware of TSMC’s FinFET technology progress, and even can not distinguish FinFETs from TSVs. My question to Dylan McGrath and those posted here is whether they have read TSMC papers on FinFETs published in IEDM as I referred above. They should, and see what technical information provided by TSMC compared with Intel. TSMC is a foundry company. As such it dose not compete directly with Intel. TSMC is ahead of its rivals such as IBM alliances and GlobalFoundries at 28nm that is in volume production this year. ARM has joined TSMC recently leaving IBM alliances for development of ARM processor at 28nm and FinFETs in near future. Therefore, TSMC dose not have to manufacture its FinFETs this year, but will be ready when in need. TSMC will be a formidable competitor for development of FinFETs beyond 22nm such as 14/12nm and 8/6nm in 2016 time period.

mcgrathdylan
User Rank
Blogger
re: Setting the record straight on the Intel-TSMC 3-D 'race'
mcgrathdylan   7/13/2011 9:11:54 PM
NO RATINGS
I don't believe it was sensationalism on purpose. I think it was an honest mistake. The author of the report, despite talking to experts, didn't understand that these were two completely different technologies. He emailed me earlier this week to say as much and also apologize. The report treated the technologies as identical, when in reality they are quite different. But, as I said, it was an honest mistake based on a lack of understanding.

resistion
User Rank
CEO
re: Setting the record straight on the Intel-TSMC 3-D 'race'
resistion   7/13/2011 3:27:14 PM
NO RATINGS
An unfortunate marketing embarrassment for Taiwan.

Geetree
User Rank
Rookie
re: Setting the record straight on the Intel-TSMC 3-D 'race'
Geetree   7/13/2011 2:52:07 AM
NO RATINGS
When you say "flawed report that falsely equivocated" and later say "this was an honest mistake" these are countradictry... I think you mean 'conflated'..?? and not "equivocated"=past participle, past tense of e·quiv·o·cate Verb: Use ambiguous language so as to conceal the truth or to avoid committing oneself. Was it sensationalism on purpose - just ignorant? or both?

mcgrathdylan
User Rank
Blogger
re: Setting the record straight on the Intel-TSMC 3-D 'race'
mcgrathdylan   7/11/2011 8:07:43 PM
NO RATINGS
Thanks for the comment. We're not above owning up to it when we goof, which (hopefully) is rare. But it does happen.

sxs537
User Rank
Rookie
re: Setting the record straight on the Intel-TSMC 3-D 'race'
sxs537   7/11/2011 7:47:44 PM
NO RATINGS
I meant mea culpa and not "Mean Culpa" :) :)

sxs537
User Rank
Rookie
re: Setting the record straight on the Intel-TSMC 3-D 'race'
sxs537   7/11/2011 7:47:01 PM
NO RATINGS
Thanks Dylan for coming back and clarifying the story. Not many people would offer a Mean Culpa when they make a mistake. So Kudos to you and EETimes and shame on all the other journalists who still continue to carry that story.

<<   <   Page 2 / 2


Top Comments of the Week
Flash Poll
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
<b><a href=Betajet">

The Circle – The Future's Imperfect in the Present Tense
Betajet
Post a comment
The Circle, a satirical, dystopian novel published in 2013 by San Francisco-based writer Dave Eggers, is about a large, very powerful technology company that combines aspects of Google, ...

Max Maxfield

Recommended Reads From the Engineer's Bookshelf
Max Maxfield
2 comments
I'm not sure if I read more than most folks or not, but I do I know that I spend quite a lot of time reading. I hate to be idle, so I always have a book or two somewhere about my person -- ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
2 comments
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
15 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Special Video Section
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...
General-purpose DACs have applications in instrumentation, ...
Linear Technology demonstrates its latest measurement ...
10:29
Demos from Maxim Integrated at Electronica 2014 show ...
Bosch CEO Stefan Finkbeiner shows off latest combo and ...
STMicroelectronics demoed this simple gesture control ...
Keysight shows you what signals lurk in real-time at 510MHz ...
TE Connectivity's clear-plastic, full-size model car shows ...
Why culture makes Linear Tech a winner.
Recently formed Architects of Modern Power consortium ...
Specially modified Corvette C7 Stingray responds to ex Indy ...
Avago’s ACPL-K30T is the first solid-state driver qualified ...
NXP launches its line of multi-gate, multifunction, ...
Doug Bailey, VP of marketing at Power Integrations, gives a ...
See how to ease software bring-up with DesignWare IP ...
DesignWare IP Prototyping Kits enable fast software ...
This video explores the LT3086, a new member of our LDO+ ...
In today’s modern electronic systems, the need for power ...