Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Barry.Pangrle_#1
User Rank
Rookie
re: CICC talk: Graphene could succeed CMOS
Barry.Pangrle_#1   9/29/2011 11:33:50 PM
NO RATINGS
From the source below, 2017-2019 for 7 nm seems pretty close to my previous comment's 2018 timeline. Again, what were the reasons for pushing 7 nm out to 2024? http://www.electroiq.com/blogs/electroiq_blog/2011/09/the-first-450mm-clubhouse.html "And note that a 2015 450mm pilot line coincides with what is expected to be the 10nm node at leading edge, and 2017-2019 could be 7nm or even 5nm."

wilber_xbox
User Rank
Manager
re: CICC talk: Graphene could succeed CMOS
wilber_xbox   9/25/2011 1:11:26 PM
NO RATINGS
I will go with the extension of the CMOS such as nanowire rather than completely different carbon based devices due to ease of integration with the current technology unless proven otherwise.

prabhakar_deosthali
User Rank
CEO
re: CICC talk: Graphene could succeed CMOS
prabhakar_deosthali   9/25/2011 11:56:43 AM
NO RATINGS
what is the vision for the associated process and test equipment availability for something with geometry of less than 7nm.

seaEE
User Rank
CEO
re: CICC talk: Graphene could succeed CMOS
seaEE   9/21/2011 2:48:08 AM
NO RATINGS
At some point we may find out whether Moore's law is process dependent, or if it is an equation that describes the capabilities of human endeavor.

Barry.Pangrle_#1
User Rank
Rookie
re: CICC talk: Graphene could succeed CMOS
Barry.Pangrle_#1   9/21/2011 1:43:50 AM
NO RATINGS
If Intel is shipping 22 nm in 2012 and on pace to deliver 14 nm in 2014, at that pace it would be 10 nm in 2016 and 7 nm in 2018. Is there some reason to believe that suddenly the pace is going to fall off dramatically between now and 2018?

JMUNN
User Rank
Rookie
re: CICC talk: Graphene could succeed CMOS
JMUNN   9/19/2011 7:25:18 PM
NO RATINGS
It sounds like we are at a realm where microbes and enzymes could do the heavy lifting instead of bulk processes like diffusion and ion implantation.

resistion
User Rank
CEO
re: CICC talk: Graphene could succeed CMOS
resistion   9/19/2011 1:53:30 AM
NO RATINGS
2024 is not 7 nm, it should be ~ 2 nm or several graphene lattice constants. 7 nm is already ~28 graphene lattice constants.

resistion
User Rank
CEO
re: CICC talk: Graphene could succeed CMOS
resistion   9/19/2011 1:28:55 AM
NO RATINGS
Graphene doesn't have much of a bandgap. Until it does, it won't replace any semiconductors.

skal_jp
User Rank
Rookie
re: CICC talk: Graphene could succeed CMOS
skal_jp   9/18/2011 11:41:51 PM
NO RATINGS
It will be interesting to see the impact on design flows. I think digital won't change that much (will graphene use GDS?), but as for analog flow it might be different. Will good old Spice stay in line? The period with CMOS and graphene (or any other successor) co-existing might be tricky. How about mixed technology, like it was for bipolar and CMOS?

GREAT-Terry
User Rank
CEO
re: CICC talk: Graphene could succeed CMOS
GREAT-Terry   9/17/2011 7:57:02 AM
NO RATINGS
2024 is not very far away from now! If graphene is going to be the next technology in electronics, we need to start more education now. At least engineering students have to learn more about this new material to be well prepare for the next generation electronics!

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Flash Poll
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Want to Present a Paper at ESC Boston 2015?
Max Maxfield
1 Comment
I tell you, I need more hours in each day. If I was having any more fun, there would have to be two of me to handle it all. For example, I just heard that I'm going to be both a speaker ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
9 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).