Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
kdboyce
User Rank
Author
re: Chips in Space: Lessons learned (Part 2)
kdboyce   9/30/2011 4:37:41 AM
NO RATINGS
Steve, I started my career at Lockheed Missiles and Space and my job was satellite payload analysis as well as failure modes and recovery methods to ensure getting the data back. It was less 'formal' (if I can use that word) than methods available today, but was nonetheless meticulous and involved knowing every circuit, its function, how it could fail, and what that failure would do to the rest of the systems. Good for anyone who later in their career had to debug of any type of system. Keep up the good work!

Robotics Developer
User Rank
Author
re: Chips in Space: Lessons learned (Part 2)
Robotics Developer   9/28/2011 11:03:10 PM
NO RATINGS
Again, a great series of articles! I remember trying to debug 15x15in pcbs in an array processor prototype with suspect boards on 15" extender boards. When running at full speed sometimes it would not work (had to run 1/2 clock speed - really glad we had designed in that!). Debug of completed systems is always a challenge but more so with compact systems!

jayshukl1121
User Rank
Author
re: Chips in Space: Lessons learned (Part 2)
jayshukl1121   9/28/2011 3:20:55 PM
NO RATINGS
This has been a great read. Thank you. Jigish Shukla www.knownfo.com

Sanjib.A
User Rank
Author
re: Chips in Space: Lessons learned (Part 2)
Sanjib.A   9/27/2011 5:48:44 PM
NO RATINGS
Steve, thank you! I agree.

Steve Bible
User Rank
Author
re: Chips in Space: Lessons learned (Part 2)
Steve Bible   9/26/2011 5:32:18 PM
NO RATINGS
Hi Sanjib, I would say that we did not use these formal methods. Thinking about them, these too should be a lesson learned. It takes someone on the team with this kind of knowledge to help lead a volunteer team. Thanks for the suggestion!

Sanjib.A
User Rank
Author
re: Chips in Space: Lessons learned (Part 2)
Sanjib.A   9/25/2011 6:22:10 AM
NO RATINGS
HI Steve, thank you for sharing the article! It gives me a deeper knowledge on ARISSat-1's power system. I saw the information about the failure modes of the battery you are talking about. Have you also used any of the traditional failure analysis tools such as FMEA, Fault Tree Analysis to organize the actions required to build the recovery mechanism for different probable failure modes for all the sub-systems?

Steve Bible
User Rank
Author
re: Chips in Space: Lessons learned (Part 2)
Steve Bible   9/25/2011 1:33:19 AM
NO RATINGS
Hi Sanjib, We did think about failure modes and how to recover from them. Tony Monteiro (AA2TX) wrote about the power system in the Jan/Feb 2011 issue of The AMSAT Journal. In the article he describes the failure modes of the battery. The article is available at http://tinyurl.com/3f72xvy.

Sanjib.A
User Rank
Author
re: Chips in Space: Lessons learned (Part 2)
Sanjib.A   9/24/2011 2:19:13 PM
NO RATINGS
Hi Steve, just curious to know ... did you do some kind of failure modes and effect analysis (FMEA) at the beginning of the design phase of the project? Were the modes of battery failures not considered? Anyways, I think now it becomes part of integrated knowledge base to avoid such possibilities in future. All the best for next one! :)



Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
As data rates begin to move beyond 25 Gbps channels, new problems arise. Getting to 50 Gbps channels might not be possible with the traditional NRZ (2-level) signaling. PAM4 lets data rates double with only a small increase in channel bandwidth by sending two bits per symbol. But, it brings new measurement and analysis problems. Signal integrity sage Ransom Stephens will explain how PAM4 differs from NRZ and what to expect in design, measurement, and signal analysis.

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Most Recent Comments
TFCSD
 
TFCSD
 
TFCSD
 
resistion
 
Tim R Johnson
 
resistion
 
docdivakar
 
David Ashton
 
TechRoadRash
Most Recent Messages
2/13/2016
10:42:58 PM
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...
The LT®3752/LT3752-1 are current mode PWM controllers ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...