Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 5   >   >>
cdhmanning
User Rank
Rookie
re: Why Intel is not inside TVs, smartphones
cdhmanning   10/28/2011 6:25:39 PM
NO RATINGS
If ARM was not there that void would have been filled by MIPS and other low-power technologies - not Intel.

Code Monkey
User Rank
Rookie
re: Why Intel is not inside TVs, smartphones
Code Monkey   10/28/2011 6:24:04 PM
NO RATINGS
Clarification: The bean counters pulled the plug. That's the downside of being a publicly traded company. There's a lot of pressure to do what looks good this quarter.

cdhmanning
User Rank
Rookie
re: Why Intel is not inside TVs, smartphones
cdhmanning   10/28/2011 6:23:44 PM
NO RATINGS
Intel have dabbled in many different segments and have always ended up dumping everything except their x86 line and associated motherboard lines. Many of their explorations were bought in. eg. They bought the StrongARM stuff from DEC and then sold it to Marvel. I would never design in an Intel FPGA or other part unless it has a second source. Of course you should blame the company as a whole. It is the corporation that decides to buy/let ho whole divisions. It seems many of these decisions to expand or contract are based on the current whims of Wall St.

gatorfan
User Rank
Rookie
re: Why Intel is not inside TVs, smartphones
gatorfan   10/28/2011 6:11:38 PM
NO RATINGS
So they say now. If you subscribe to the disruptive technology headline of tablets and phones introduced by the wave of ARM based products, this may not be true in 5 years.

Kurt.Peters_#2
User Rank
Rookie
re: Why Intel is not inside TVs, smartphones
Kurt.Peters_#2   10/28/2011 5:57:07 PM
NO RATINGS
"merging x86 cores and flash on a chip"... [I think you have that wrong]. They used to have XScale (which I believe is an ARM architecture) and divested themselves of it. I think your quote is wrong, and those "Hermon" and other Flash + logic chips had the ARM-based Xscale chip on them. Regardless, your point is better made by the fact that Intel COULD have had a large market share of ARM processors if they hadn't made that arrogant decision.

eembedded_janitor
User Rank
Rookie
re: Why Intel is not inside TVs, smartphones
eembedded_janitor   10/28/2011 2:30:16 AM
NO RATINGS
Intel is hobbled by the x86. Relative to register rich RISC-like architectures like ARM, register-poor CICS x86 instructions need a lot of clocking to get stuff done. The only way to get x86 speed up is to vastly increase chip and instruction execution complexity. That means lots of transistors end up being clocked every instruction which means a lot of power gets consumed. All up, that means x86 parts are expensive and power hungry relative to ARM parts on any apples-to-apples comparison. High cost and high power is just totally incompatible with mobile space.

eembedded_janitor
User Rank
Rookie
re: Why Intel is not inside TVs, smartphones
eembedded_janitor   10/28/2011 2:24:17 AM
NO RATINGS
"Google’s Android is very much proprietary". Help yoourself here: http://source.android.com/

Silicon_Smith
User Rank
Rookie
re: Why Intel is not inside TVs, smartphones
Silicon_Smith   10/27/2011 6:59:35 PM
NO RATINGS
I agree. It seems to me that Intel has an "all-or-nothing" approach to markets.It has been selling in a huge market for years without any significant competition and this has resulted in complacency vis-a-vis the customers and competition. It keeps wanting customers who rely on it due to its pole and sole position, and small and insignificant competitors. Neither of this would be on offer in the mobile and future computing markets.

Silicon_Smith
User Rank
Rookie
re: Why Intel is not inside TVs, smartphones
Silicon_Smith   10/27/2011 6:55:04 PM
NO RATINGS
Good observation, I just assumed it was the way the IDs were made. But it credits with actual names which should have a space between the first and last name.

MikeSantarini
User Rank
Manager
re: Why Intel is not inside TVs, smartphones
MikeSantarini   10/27/2011 5:08:28 PM
NO RATINGS
a bit off topic-- why don't EE Times bylines have a space between your first and last names? It drives me a bit nutty.

<<   <   Page 2 / 5   >   >>


Most Recent Comments
rick merritt
 
rick merritt
 
Carl_S
 
TonyTib
 
NoNIckName_#2
 
Max The Magnificent
 
Duane Benson
 
Max The Magnificent
 
Max The Magnificent
Flash Poll
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Engineer's Bookshelf
Caleb Kraft

The Martian: A Delightful Exploration of Math, Mars & Feces
Caleb Kraft
3 comments
To say that Andy Weir's The Martian is an exploration of math, Mars, and feces is a slight simplification. I doubt that the author would have any complaints, though.

The Engineering Life - Around the Web
Caleb Kraft

Surprise TOQ Teardown at EELive!
Caleb Kraft
Post a comment
This year, for EELive! I had a little surprise that I was quite eager to share. Qualcom had given us a TOQ smart watch in order to award someone a prize. We were given complete freedom to ...

Design Contests & Competitions
Caleb Kraft

Join The Balancing Act With April's Caption Contest
Caleb Kraft
53 comments
Sometimes it can feel like you're really performing in the big tent when presenting your hardware. This month's caption contest exemplifies this wonderfully.

Engineering Investigations
Caleb Kraft

Frankenstein's Fix: The Winners Announced!
Caleb Kraft
8 comments
The Frankenstein's Fix contest for the Tektronix Scope has finally officially come to an end. We had an incredibly amusing live chat earlier today to announce the winners. However, we ...

Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)