Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 5   >   >>
cdhmanning
User Rank
Author
re: Why Intel is not inside TVs, smartphones
cdhmanning   10/28/2011 6:25:39 PM
NO RATINGS
If ARM was not there that void would have been filled by MIPS and other low-power technologies - not Intel.

Code Monkey
User Rank
Author
re: Why Intel is not inside TVs, smartphones
Code Monkey   10/28/2011 6:24:04 PM
NO RATINGS
Clarification: The bean counters pulled the plug. That's the downside of being a publicly traded company. There's a lot of pressure to do what looks good this quarter.

cdhmanning
User Rank
Author
re: Why Intel is not inside TVs, smartphones
cdhmanning   10/28/2011 6:23:44 PM
NO RATINGS
Intel have dabbled in many different segments and have always ended up dumping everything except their x86 line and associated motherboard lines. Many of their explorations were bought in. eg. They bought the StrongARM stuff from DEC and then sold it to Marvel. I would never design in an Intel FPGA or other part unless it has a second source. Of course you should blame the company as a whole. It is the corporation that decides to buy/let ho whole divisions. It seems many of these decisions to expand or contract are based on the current whims of Wall St.

gatorfan
User Rank
Author
re: Why Intel is not inside TVs, smartphones
gatorfan   10/28/2011 6:11:38 PM
NO RATINGS
So they say now. If you subscribe to the disruptive technology headline of tablets and phones introduced by the wave of ARM based products, this may not be true in 5 years.

Kurt.Peters_#2
User Rank
Author
re: Why Intel is not inside TVs, smartphones
Kurt.Peters_#2   10/28/2011 5:57:07 PM
NO RATINGS
"merging x86 cores and flash on a chip"... [I think you have that wrong]. They used to have XScale (which I believe is an ARM architecture) and divested themselves of it. I think your quote is wrong, and those "Hermon" and other Flash + logic chips had the ARM-based Xscale chip on them. Regardless, your point is better made by the fact that Intel COULD have had a large market share of ARM processors if they hadn't made that arrogant decision.

eembedded_janitor
User Rank
Author
re: Why Intel is not inside TVs, smartphones
eembedded_janitor   10/28/2011 2:30:16 AM
NO RATINGS
Intel is hobbled by the x86. Relative to register rich RISC-like architectures like ARM, register-poor CICS x86 instructions need a lot of clocking to get stuff done. The only way to get x86 speed up is to vastly increase chip and instruction execution complexity. That means lots of transistors end up being clocked every instruction which means a lot of power gets consumed. All up, that means x86 parts are expensive and power hungry relative to ARM parts on any apples-to-apples comparison. High cost and high power is just totally incompatible with mobile space.

eembedded_janitor
User Rank
Author
re: Why Intel is not inside TVs, smartphones
eembedded_janitor   10/28/2011 2:24:17 AM
NO RATINGS
"Google’s Android is very much proprietary". Help yoourself here: http://source.android.com/

Silicon_Smith
User Rank
Author
re: Why Intel is not inside TVs, smartphones
Silicon_Smith   10/27/2011 6:59:35 PM
NO RATINGS
I agree. It seems to me that Intel has an "all-or-nothing" approach to markets.It has been selling in a huge market for years without any significant competition and this has resulted in complacency vis-a-vis the customers and competition. It keeps wanting customers who rely on it due to its pole and sole position, and small and insignificant competitors. Neither of this would be on offer in the mobile and future computing markets.

Silicon_Smith
User Rank
Author
re: Why Intel is not inside TVs, smartphones
Silicon_Smith   10/27/2011 6:55:04 PM
NO RATINGS
Good observation, I just assumed it was the way the IDs were made. But it credits with actual names which should have a space between the first and last name.

MikeSantarini
User Rank
Author
re: Why Intel is not inside TVs, smartphones
MikeSantarini   10/27/2011 5:08:28 PM
NO RATINGS
a bit off topic-- why don't EE Times bylines have a space between your first and last names? It drives me a bit nutty.

<<   <   Page 2 / 5   >   >>


Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
As data rates begin to move beyond 25 Gbps channels, new problems arise. Getting to 50 Gbps channels might not be possible with the traditional NRZ (2-level) signaling. PAM4 lets data rates double with only a small increase in channel bandwidth by sending two bits per symbol. But, it brings new measurement and analysis problems. Signal integrity sage Ransom Stephens will explain how PAM4 differs from NRZ and what to expect in design, measurement, and signal analysis.

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...
The LT®3752/LT3752-1 are current mode PWM controllers ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...