Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 5   >   >>
cdhmanning
User Rank
Rookie
re: Why Intel is not inside TVs, smartphones
cdhmanning   10/28/2011 6:25:39 PM
NO RATINGS
If ARM was not there that void would have been filled by MIPS and other low-power technologies - not Intel.

Code Monkey
User Rank
Rookie
re: Why Intel is not inside TVs, smartphones
Code Monkey   10/28/2011 6:24:04 PM
NO RATINGS
Clarification: The bean counters pulled the plug. That's the downside of being a publicly traded company. There's a lot of pressure to do what looks good this quarter.

cdhmanning
User Rank
Rookie
re: Why Intel is not inside TVs, smartphones
cdhmanning   10/28/2011 6:23:44 PM
NO RATINGS
Intel have dabbled in many different segments and have always ended up dumping everything except their x86 line and associated motherboard lines. Many of their explorations were bought in. eg. They bought the StrongARM stuff from DEC and then sold it to Marvel. I would never design in an Intel FPGA or other part unless it has a second source. Of course you should blame the company as a whole. It is the corporation that decides to buy/let ho whole divisions. It seems many of these decisions to expand or contract are based on the current whims of Wall St.

gatorfan
User Rank
Rookie
re: Why Intel is not inside TVs, smartphones
gatorfan   10/28/2011 6:11:38 PM
NO RATINGS
So they say now. If you subscribe to the disruptive technology headline of tablets and phones introduced by the wave of ARM based products, this may not be true in 5 years.

Kurt.Peters_#2
User Rank
Rookie
re: Why Intel is not inside TVs, smartphones
Kurt.Peters_#2   10/28/2011 5:57:07 PM
NO RATINGS
"merging x86 cores and flash on a chip"... [I think you have that wrong]. They used to have XScale (which I believe is an ARM architecture) and divested themselves of it. I think your quote is wrong, and those "Hermon" and other Flash + logic chips had the ARM-based Xscale chip on them. Regardless, your point is better made by the fact that Intel COULD have had a large market share of ARM processors if they hadn't made that arrogant decision.

eembedded_janitor
User Rank
Rookie
re: Why Intel is not inside TVs, smartphones
eembedded_janitor   10/28/2011 2:30:16 AM
NO RATINGS
Intel is hobbled by the x86. Relative to register rich RISC-like architectures like ARM, register-poor CICS x86 instructions need a lot of clocking to get stuff done. The only way to get x86 speed up is to vastly increase chip and instruction execution complexity. That means lots of transistors end up being clocked every instruction which means a lot of power gets consumed. All up, that means x86 parts are expensive and power hungry relative to ARM parts on any apples-to-apples comparison. High cost and high power is just totally incompatible with mobile space.

eembedded_janitor
User Rank
Rookie
re: Why Intel is not inside TVs, smartphones
eembedded_janitor   10/28/2011 2:24:17 AM
NO RATINGS
"Google’s Android is very much proprietary". Help yoourself here: http://source.android.com/

Silicon_Smith
User Rank
Rookie
re: Why Intel is not inside TVs, smartphones
Silicon_Smith   10/27/2011 6:59:35 PM
NO RATINGS
I agree. It seems to me that Intel has an "all-or-nothing" approach to markets.It has been selling in a huge market for years without any significant competition and this has resulted in complacency vis-a-vis the customers and competition. It keeps wanting customers who rely on it due to its pole and sole position, and small and insignificant competitors. Neither of this would be on offer in the mobile and future computing markets.

Silicon_Smith
User Rank
Rookie
re: Why Intel is not inside TVs, smartphones
Silicon_Smith   10/27/2011 6:55:04 PM
NO RATINGS
Good observation, I just assumed it was the way the IDs were made. But it credits with actual names which should have a space between the first and last name.

MikeSantarini
User Rank
Manager
re: Why Intel is not inside TVs, smartphones
MikeSantarini   10/27/2011 5:08:28 PM
NO RATINGS
a bit off topic-- why don't EE Times bylines have a space between your first and last names? It drives me a bit nutty.

<<   <   Page 2 / 5   >   >>


EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Steve Wozniak Reacts to Latest iPhone
Max Maxfield
8 comments
Funnily enough, just a few days ago as I pen these words, I was chatting with my wife (Gina the Gorgeous) when she informed me that -- as a kid -- she had never played at making a ...

EDN Staff

11 Summer Vacation Spots for Engineers
EDN Staff
20 comments
This collection of places from technology history, museums, and modern marvels is a roadmap for an engineering adventure that will take you around the world. Here are just a few spots ...

Glen Chenier

Engineers Solve Analog/Digital Problem, Invent Creative Expletives
Glen Chenier
15 comments
- An analog engineer and a digital engineer join forces, use their respective skills, and pull a few bunnies out of a hat to troubleshoot a system with which they are completely ...

Larry Desjardin

Engineers Should Study Finance: 5 Reasons Why
Larry Desjardin
46 comments
I'm a big proponent of engineers learning financial basics. Why? Because engineers are making decisions all the time, in multiple ways. Having a good financial understanding guides these ...

Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)