Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Duane Benson
User Rank
Blogger
re: Report: China pours funds to forge an innovation powerhouse
Duane Benson   11/29/2011 7:00:09 PM
NO RATINGS
If companies paying for people to develop IP shouldn't make profit off of intellectual property, then it would make sense that the person creating the invention should not get paid either. Our patent system may be in need of a serious tune up, but people with a high brain to brawn ratio are not allowed to profit from the fruits of their labors, they will stop and go move boxes or do something else that will pay the bills.

kablakely
User Rank
Rookie
re: Report: China pours funds to forge an innovation powerhouse
kablakely   11/29/2011 4:35:11 PM
NO RATINGS
IP absolutely IS property. It is the result of an investment of hard assets to create an innovation - process, product, etc. - and it is entirely appropriate to expect protection of the ownership on that newly created asset in order to achieve a return on investment. Without that, what could possibly be the motivation for continued investment? More to the point, what would finance that ongoing investment? You have to generate profits from innovation in order to continue to fuel the process.

markhahn0
User Rank
Rookie
re: Report: China pours funds to forge an innovation powerhouse
markhahn0   11/9/2011 7:36:25 PM
NO RATINGS
come on people - IP is not property. limited monopolies are granted for a purpose: to grow the whole, not to permit innovation to be hoarded. that's what's so fundamentally broken in the current worldwide IP regime: dumb MBA-think has distorted the concept into some kind of design-wise turf war, when the purpose of IP protection is to maximize innovation by letting others build on your ideas. in other words, IP doesn't mean you're somehow "owed" profits because you came up with something novel and non-obvious. (not to mention the fact that current IP schemes make a mockery of the novel/non-obvious requirement!)

Code Monkey
User Rank
Rookie
re: Report: China pours funds to forge an innovation powerhouse
Code Monkey   11/8/2011 9:21:03 PM
NO RATINGS
I think China will want to have it both ways. Strong IP protection in order to play in the global marketplace, but reserving an idealogical right to co-opt it for the good of China. The west will depend on pragmatism to trump nationalism, which works in the short term. And the short term is all the west understands.

ChrisGammell
User Rank
Rookie
re: Report: China pours funds to forge an innovation powerhouse
ChrisGammell   11/8/2011 8:55:10 PM
NO RATINGS
Cool, can we have some of that manufacturing back then in the US? China is probably sick of it by now anyway, right?

chanj0
User Rank
CEO
re: Report: China pours funds to forge an innovation powerhouse
chanj0   11/8/2011 4:25:32 PM
NO RATINGS
IP protection and, in general, moral standard have to be improved to make innovation possible. IP protection will guarantee the invention is not stolen internally. Moral standard is important in teh area of pharmaceutical research. Law may help restore the order.



EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Feast Your Orbs on My Jiggly Exercise Machine
Max Maxfield
49 comments
Last weekend, I was chatting with my mother on the phone. She's all excited that I'm coming over to visit for a week in November. "I'll be seeing you in only seven weeks," she trilled ...

Glen Chenier

Missing Datasheet Details Can Cause Problems
Glen Chenier
3 comments
It is often said that "the devil is in the details." All too often those details are hidden deep within a datasheet, where you can easily overlook them. When a datasheet reference circuit ...

David Blaza

RadioShack: The End Is Nigh!
David Blaza
121 comments
I'm feeling a little nostalgic today as I read about what looks like the imminent demise of RadioShack, at least as we currently know it. An old ubiquitous cartoon image popped into my ...

Larry Desjardin

Engineers Should Study Finance: 5 Reasons Why
Larry Desjardin
46 comments
I'm a big proponent of engineers learning financial basics. Why? Because engineers are making decisions all the time, in multiple ways. Having a good financial understanding guides these ...

Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)