Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 7 / 7
goafrit
User Rank
Manager
re: Our own planned obsolescence?
goafrit   11/11/2011 11:34:33 AM
NO RATINGS
Yes, that includes people and jobs. This is a serious issue as 9% are out of jobs.

goafrit
User Rank
Manager
re: Our own planned obsolescence?
goafrit   11/11/2011 11:33:41 AM
NO RATINGS
Make a suggestion as no void will not work. What can we do?

Sheetal.Pandey
User Rank
Manager
re: Our own planned obsolescence?
Sheetal.Pandey   11/11/2011 7:35:00 AM
NO RATINGS
Obsolescence is very practical to living an dnon living things. Unless you keep upgrading per market need or keep learning new things everything and everyone is liable to be obsolete.

daleste
User Rank
CEO
re: Our own planned obsolescence?
daleste   11/11/2011 3:18:52 AM
NO RATINGS
How do we employ the 9% of our population that wants to work and can't find jobs? I don't think we can depend on our government to fix this. The corporations or too skittish to hire right now and you can't blame them. They don't want to have to lay off workers next year either. It is a tough problem and I don't think having an engineer in charge will solve it. Time may be the only solution to this problem.

resistion
User Rank
CEO
re: Our own planned obsolescence?
resistion   11/11/2011 12:40:08 AM
NO RATINGS
Great comment. Cost reduction goes against the capitalist principle of investing more to produce and sell even more. The problem could be consumers don't know what electronics they want to buy anymore. There is not enough innovation beyond the smartphone or computer.

Bert22306
User Rank
CEO
re: Our own planned obsolescence?
Bert22306   11/10/2011 11:37:43 PM
NO RATINGS
I dunno. It seems to me that the excuse that technology is taking away jobs has been used, and proved wrong, for too many years - even centuries. Instead, technology raises the standard of living for everyone in the economy, and it has resulted in periods of amazingly low unemployment. (Anything less than 4 percent unemployment is almost too low, I think, showing no workforce mobility. And we had such low levels not long ago.) The current unemployment level was sudden, initially caused by an insane housing bubble that deservedly burst. Greed at all levels, and simply bad government policies. The government shoudn't have been guaranteeing loans when those loans should have been discouraged. That's just dumb. When a downturn happens so suddenly, I have to doubt that the cause is something that developed over decades, like "technology." Could be, but it seems very unlikely. The reason unemployment persists? Ask businesses why they don't hire. A common refrain is, too much uncertainty. That too is caused by bad government policies. You don't hire new employees if you feel that new tax policies will cut you off at the knees in the next year or two. Instead of blaming technology, which seems like the quintessential lame cheap shot, we should be investigating why the housing bubble existed in the first place, and what is giving business owners the jitters now. That's how you find the answers, I believe. And people lashing out at grotesquely overpaid executives is an understandable reaction, no doubt, but I also don't see how that could cause persistent unemployment. Their little incestuous corporate boards, where they vote on each others' obscene annual compensations, should somehow be made illegal. But by itself, that won't fix the economy. It would merely right a wrong.

David Ashton
User Rank
Blogger
re: Our own planned obsolescence?
David Ashton   11/10/2011 11:26:19 PM
NO RATINGS
"So, the problem is not technology. It is simply capitalism that is not compassionate." Goafrit, I think you've hit the nail on the head.

Brian Fuller2
User Rank
Rookie
re: Our own planned obsolescence?
Brian Fuller2   11/10/2011 11:13:39 PM
NO RATINGS
Simply (and well) said, Goafrit. There seems to be a growing understanding that North American companies (or companies in any advanced economies) need to pull manufacturing closer to home. Without design and manufacturing next to each other, problems quickly emerge.

goafrit
User Rank
Manager
re: Our own planned obsolescence?
goafrit   11/10/2011 10:38:01 PM
NO RATINGS
Nice post. It is simply innovating at the top and not also at the bottom. That is what is happening in the U.S. I think Economist must not use the fact that technology is making tasks easier to justify that unemployment will remain high. The human species cannot be displaced by technology. It is only man's decision that will displace us. U.S. does not have 9% unemployment because of technology, but rather, because of decision of business leaders. If all the factories we are building in Asia are in U.S., we will still have the technology and also the jobs. So, the problem is not technology. It is simply capitalism that is not compassionate.

EVVJSK0
User Rank
Manager
re: Our own planned obsolescence?
EVVJSK0   11/10/2011 9:45:22 PM
NO RATINGS
"what is the purpose of a business" Unfortunately, the needs of the investor have recently risen to the top priority(over the needs of the customer, society, employees, etc...). That has lead to short term planning instead of long term planning (keeping customers and employees satisfied, Research and Development to stay relevent, etc...). This is a factor of the Wall Street churn and the reason the Executive Compensation has grossly outpaced employee compensation over the last 20 years (and the reason the middle class has suffered).

<<   <   Page 7 / 7


EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Some Days You're the Pigeon, Others You're the Statue
Max Maxfield
26 comments
I was watching the travel channel on television the other evening. It was some program about Madrid. The thing I really noticed was the plethora of statues all over the place.

EDN Staff

11 Summer Vacation Spots for Engineers
EDN Staff
20 comments
This collection of places from technology history, museums, and modern marvels is a roadmap for an engineering adventure that will take you around the world. Here are just a few spots ...

Glen Chenier

Engineers Solve Analog/Digital Problem, Invent Creative Expletives
Glen Chenier
15 comments
- An analog engineer and a digital engineer join forces, use their respective skills, and pull a few bunnies out of a hat to troubleshoot a system with which they are completely ...

Larry Desjardin

Engineers Should Study Finance: 5 Reasons Why
Larry Desjardin
46 comments
I'm a big proponent of engineers learning financial basics. Why? Because engineers are making decisions all the time, in multiple ways. Having a good financial understanding guides these ...

Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)