Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 7 / 7
goafrit
User Rank
Author
re: Our own planned obsolescence?
goafrit   11/11/2011 11:34:33 AM
NO RATINGS
Yes, that includes people and jobs. This is a serious issue as 9% are out of jobs.

goafrit
User Rank
Author
re: Our own planned obsolescence?
goafrit   11/11/2011 11:33:41 AM
NO RATINGS
Make a suggestion as no void will not work. What can we do?

Sheetal.Pandey
User Rank
Author
re: Our own planned obsolescence?
Sheetal.Pandey   11/11/2011 7:35:00 AM
NO RATINGS
Obsolescence is very practical to living an dnon living things. Unless you keep upgrading per market need or keep learning new things everything and everyone is liable to be obsolete.

daleste
User Rank
Author
re: Our own planned obsolescence?
daleste   11/11/2011 3:18:52 AM
NO RATINGS
How do we employ the 9% of our population that wants to work and can't find jobs? I don't think we can depend on our government to fix this. The corporations or too skittish to hire right now and you can't blame them. They don't want to have to lay off workers next year either. It is a tough problem and I don't think having an engineer in charge will solve it. Time may be the only solution to this problem.

resistion
User Rank
Author
re: Our own planned obsolescence?
resistion   11/11/2011 12:40:08 AM
NO RATINGS
Great comment. Cost reduction goes against the capitalist principle of investing more to produce and sell even more. The problem could be consumers don't know what electronics they want to buy anymore. There is not enough innovation beyond the smartphone or computer.

Bert22306
User Rank
Author
re: Our own planned obsolescence?
Bert22306   11/10/2011 11:37:43 PM
NO RATINGS
I dunno. It seems to me that the excuse that technology is taking away jobs has been used, and proved wrong, for too many years - even centuries. Instead, technology raises the standard of living for everyone in the economy, and it has resulted in periods of amazingly low unemployment. (Anything less than 4 percent unemployment is almost too low, I think, showing no workforce mobility. And we had such low levels not long ago.) The current unemployment level was sudden, initially caused by an insane housing bubble that deservedly burst. Greed at all levels, and simply bad government policies. The government shoudn't have been guaranteeing loans when those loans should have been discouraged. That's just dumb. When a downturn happens so suddenly, I have to doubt that the cause is something that developed over decades, like "technology." Could be, but it seems very unlikely. The reason unemployment persists? Ask businesses why they don't hire. A common refrain is, too much uncertainty. That too is caused by bad government policies. You don't hire new employees if you feel that new tax policies will cut you off at the knees in the next year or two. Instead of blaming technology, which seems like the quintessential lame cheap shot, we should be investigating why the housing bubble existed in the first place, and what is giving business owners the jitters now. That's how you find the answers, I believe. And people lashing out at grotesquely overpaid executives is an understandable reaction, no doubt, but I also don't see how that could cause persistent unemployment. Their little incestuous corporate boards, where they vote on each others' obscene annual compensations, should somehow be made illegal. But by itself, that won't fix the economy. It would merely right a wrong.

David Ashton
User Rank
Author
re: Our own planned obsolescence?
David Ashton   11/10/2011 11:26:19 PM
NO RATINGS
"So, the problem is not technology. It is simply capitalism that is not compassionate." Goafrit, I think you've hit the nail on the head.

Brian Fuller2
User Rank
Author
re: Our own planned obsolescence?
Brian Fuller2   11/10/2011 11:13:39 PM
NO RATINGS
Simply (and well) said, Goafrit. There seems to be a growing understanding that North American companies (or companies in any advanced economies) need to pull manufacturing closer to home. Without design and manufacturing next to each other, problems quickly emerge.

goafrit
User Rank
Author
re: Our own planned obsolescence?
goafrit   11/10/2011 10:38:01 PM
NO RATINGS
Nice post. It is simply innovating at the top and not also at the bottom. That is what is happening in the U.S. I think Economist must not use the fact that technology is making tasks easier to justify that unemployment will remain high. The human species cannot be displaced by technology. It is only man's decision that will displace us. U.S. does not have 9% unemployment because of technology, but rather, because of decision of business leaders. If all the factories we are building in Asia are in U.S., we will still have the technology and also the jobs. So, the problem is not technology. It is simply capitalism that is not compassionate.

EVVJSK0
User Rank
Author
re: Our own planned obsolescence?
EVVJSK0   11/10/2011 9:45:22 PM
NO RATINGS
"what is the purpose of a business" Unfortunately, the needs of the investor have recently risen to the top priority(over the needs of the customer, society, employees, etc...). That has lead to short term planning instead of long term planning (keeping customers and employees satisfied, Research and Development to stay relevent, etc...). This is a factor of the Wall Street churn and the reason the Executive Compensation has grossly outpaced employee compensation over the last 20 years (and the reason the middle class has suffered).

<<   <   Page 7 / 7


Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST

What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.

Brought to you by:

Most Recent Comments
michigan0
 
SteveHarris0
 
realjjj
 
SteveHarris0
 
SteveHarris0
 
VicVat
 
Les_Slater
 
SSDWEM
 
witeken
Most Recent Messages
9/25/2016
4:48:30 PM
michigan0 Sang Kim First, 28nm bulk is in volume manufacturing for several years by the major semiconductor companies but not 28nm FDSOI today yet. Why not? Simply because unlike 28nm bulk the LDD(Lightly Doped Drain) to minimize hot carrier generation can't be implemented in 28nm FDSOI. Furthermore, hot carrier reliability becomes worse with scaling, That is the major reason why 28nm FDSOI is not manufacturable today and will not be. Second, how can you suppress the leakage currents from such ultra short 7nm due to the short channel effects? How thin SOI thickness is required to prevent punch-through of un-dopped 7nm FDSOI? Possibly less than 4nm. Depositing such an ultra thin film less then 4nm filum uniformly and reliably over 12" wafers at the manufacturing line is extremely difficult or not even manufacturable. If not manufacturable, the 7nm FDSOI debate is over!Third, what happens when hot carriers are generated near the drain at normal operation of 7nm FDSOI? Electrons go to the positively biased drain with no harm but where the holes to go? The holes can't go to the substrate because of the thin BOX layer. Some holes may become trapped at the BOX layer causing Vt shift. However, the vast majority of holes drift through the the un-dopped SOI channel toward the N+Source,...
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
Once the base layer of a design has been taped out, making ...
In this short video we show an LED light demo to ...
The LTC2380-24 is a versatile 24-bit SAR ADC that combines ...
In this short video we show an LED light demo to ...
02:46
Wireless Power enables applications where it is difficult ...
07:41
LEDs are being used in current luxury model automotive ...
With design sizes expected to increase by 5X through 2020, ...
01:48
Linear Technology’s LT8330 and LT8331, two Low Quiescent ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
05:27
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
05:18
Silego Technology’s highly versatile Mixed-signal GreenPAK ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...