Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 4 / 5   >   >>
Bob Lacovara
User Rank
Rookie
re: Solyndra: Its technology and why it failed
Bob Lacovara   11/28/2011 3:10:35 PM
NO RATINGS
Clearly, the idea isn't obviously good. To decide if it's good isn't a matter of inspection, either. If you'd like to decide whether or not this is such a great idea, replace the cylindrical cross section of the Solyndra design with either a flat plate of the same diameter, or if you like, an surface with an angle of perhaps 120 degrees. Then point this surface towards noon, and calculate the effective surface area compared to a cylindrical surface. Then you can decide whether or not the cylinder is a good idea. I haven't done this calculation, but perhaps I will.

Bob Lacovara
User Rank
Rookie
re: Solyndra: Its technology and why it failed
Bob Lacovara   11/28/2011 3:06:58 PM
NO RATINGS
Since when does every new invention require the support of the government to be developed? If an idea cannot support itself, why should you and I support it? Is this what it has come to? A new product doesn't have to attract investors, it just has to have enough friends in the government to warrant spending taxpayer's money. As a result, the market no longer determines what is valuable and what is dross: some ignorant civil servant picks winners on the basis of what he hears on television, or what his boss tells him to back. Remember that the originator of the weed whacker (string trimmer) couldn't get a patent because some dolt of a judge decided that the string trimmer idea was "obvious". So much for government insight into technology.

Bob Lacovara
User Rank
Rookie
re: Solyndra: Its technology and why it failed
Bob Lacovara   11/28/2011 3:02:28 PM
NO RATINGS
What a pity... this global leader, winner of a Nobel prize for, um, something, leader and defender of Fast and Furious, defender of illegal aliens against the state of Arizona, this monarch among men, will lose an election just because of a little mistake on a solar power company? There's just no justice in this world.

eet213
User Rank
Rookie
re: Solyndra: Its technology and why it failed
eet213   11/28/2011 10:57:11 AM
NO RATINGS
I wish this company never got registered. It is the only beast that will cost us next election. Obama could lose for this mess. http://www.uk-power-battery.co.uk

eet213
User Rank
Rookie
re: Solyndra: Its technology and why it failed
eet213   11/28/2011 10:56:14 AM
NO RATINGS
During my trips in China in recent years, I saw this type of solar design every where. If that is what Solyndra is proud of, one should not have hard time to understand why it fails.http://www.uk-power-battery.co.uk

Robotics Developer
User Rank
Rookie
re: Solyndra: Its technology and why it failed
Robotics Developer   11/27/2011 3:45:46 AM
NO RATINGS
Well I am sure that there are a number of factors with the failure of Solyndra for me it was simple: Government should not be involved with "investing" in any company. The normal channels of investment are far better capable of understanding and evaluating risks and viability of start-up companies/new technologies than ANY Federal/State/Local government entity!! Let this be a warning for future government meddling: taxpayer beware!

ibm221
User Rank
Rookie
re: Solyndra: Its technology and why it failed
ibm221   11/25/2011 12:11:32 AM
NO RATINGS
LOL, you 'd better look carefully. Those solar design in china generate hot water instead of electricity. but Solyndra could have draw inspiration from them.

Bert22306
User Rank
CEO
re: Solyndra: Its technology and why it failed
Bert22306   11/24/2011 8:37:46 PM
NO RATINGS
This article brings to mind a previous one, about tradeoffs in engineering design. As I opined then, no design is without tradeoffs. Any designers knows this intrinsically. These solar panels are no exception. Obviously, a flat panel oriented optimally will be more efficient. Just as obviously, the installation will be more difficult. And, depending on the obsessive-compulsive tendencies of the homeowner, the level of personal stress during storms would be considerable lower for the Solyndra panel owner. I have very serious doubts about this particular "federated" model for "going green." Going green, by depending on average individuals to own and maintain more of the infrastructure, seems doomed to failure. My prediction is, the average joe will be all enthusiastic in his new display of social consciousness to neighbors, at first. He will then become bored with the exercise, let the once-new hardware take its passive course, and soon enough tear it all down in a search for a simpler life (and reducing what has by now become an eye sore). Some people are able to predict this behavior sooner than others, never intending to jump on the bandwagon. We got away from backyard wells, coal or even oil burning furnaces, candles and kerosene lamps, splitting logs and then cooking on wood fires, and so on, for some very good reasons. It just seems extremely risky to base a business model on people going backwards, in this regard. The government is not particularly adept at business oriented risk assessment. Politicians think and act on slogans and hype, not business acumen. The voter needs to internalize this and make decisions apprpriately (IMO, naturally).

Artist
User Rank
Rookie
re: Solyndra: Its technology and why it failed
Artist   11/24/2011 8:21:00 PM
NO RATINGS
During my trips in China in recent years, I saw this type of solar design every where. If that is what Solyndra is proud of, one should not have hard time to understand why it fails.

agk
User Rank
Rookie
re: Solyndra: Its technology and why it failed
agk   11/24/2011 11:49:19 AM
NO RATINGS
The idea is good . This design seems that the coverage is from almost from sun raise to sun set. I feel that the tube diameters can be increased for better efficiency and with a little more strong mounting.

<<   <   Page 4 / 5   >   >>


Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Book Review: Deadly Odds by Allen Wyler
Max Maxfield
11 comments
Generally speaking, when it comes to settling down with a good book, I tend to gravitate towards science fiction and science fantasy. Having said this, I do spend a lot of time reading ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
14 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).