Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 3 / 3
Sheetal.Pandey
User Rank
Author
re: Intel, Google don't support Android to PC port
Sheetal.Pandey   12/5/2011 10:50:13 AM
NO RATINGS
wow if Intel get into tablet market with Android ported,,it would be interesting.

Neo10
User Rank
Author
re: Intel, Google don't support Android to PC port
Neo10   12/5/2011 10:03:31 AM
NO RATINGS
Android for evrything they can lay their hands on seems to be the mantra for freelance developers with free time these days. There are sevral reasons it has been adopted for smartphones without much of fight but the same cannot be said of PCs which has seen many tens if not hundreds of OSes come and fade away.

yalanand
User Rank
Author
re: Intel, Google don't support Android to PC port
yalanand   12/4/2011 2:53:04 PM
NO RATINGS
Is Huang refusing to submit his version back to Google for integration? why he is opposed to merging his version with the google ?

VNP
User Rank
Author
re: Intel, Google don't support Android to PC port
VNP   12/4/2011 2:43:07 PM
NO RATINGS
Well, AMD wants to be in the pink and tries to port Android to own chips. May be before making decision about cooperation with Google. It seems to be reasonable. Actually I do not understand why this topic is discussed by the community. No news?

tb1
User Rank
Author
re: Intel, Google don't support Android to PC port
tb1   12/3/2011 3:13:29 AM
NO RATINGS
Heck, Android can be the new Linux for PCs! It's a heck of a lot easier to use than Ubuntu.

tb1
User Rank
Author
re: Intel, Google don't support Android to PC port
tb1   12/3/2011 3:07:51 AM
NO RATINGS
I think an Android PC makes a lot more sense than a Chrome PC. Google combined the phone and tablet versions of Android to create the "Ice Cream Sandwich" rev of Android. Maybe they can do the same thing with Chrome and Android to create a PC Android. We have Android tablets, why not Android portables?

<<   <   Page 3 / 3


Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST
IoT Network Shoot Out
July 16, 1pm EDT Thursday

Replay available now: A handful of emerging network technologies are competing to be the preferred wide-area connection for the Internet of Things. All claim lower costs and power use than cellular but none have wide deployment yet. Listen in as proponents of leading contenders make their case to be the metro or national IoT network of the future. Rick Merritt, EE Times Silicon Valley Bureau Chief, moderators this discussion. Join in and ask his guests questions.

Brought to you by

Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Special Video Section
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...
The LT®3752/LT3752-1 are current mode PWM controllers ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...
General-purpose DACs have applications in instrumentation, ...
Linear Technology demonstrates its latest measurement ...
10:29
Demos from Maxim Integrated at Electronica 2014 show ...
Bosch CEO Stefan Finkbeiner shows off latest combo and ...
STMicroelectronics demoed this simple gesture control ...
Keysight shows you what signals lurk in real-time at 510MHz ...
TE Connectivity's clear-plastic, full-size model car shows ...
Why culture makes Linear Tech a winner.