Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 3   >   >>
Luis Sanchez
User Rank
Author
re: Intel, Google don't support Android to PC port
Luis Sanchez   12/6/2011 5:31:31 PM
NO RATINGS
Well, what would be Google’s official statement? I think as a comment mentions, the Chrome OS is the one for PC’s. Netbooks actually. But… haven’t hear much about it. I remember it was making a big buzz about a year a go but looks like Android is keeping Google engineers busy. And… is fragmentation bad? Linux got all fragmented didn’t it? I think is a matter of time to hear about a fragmentation from Android, new distro’s and the like. Anyway, looks like someone in the group actually says this fragmentation isn’t happening as Huang’s intentions as they have submitted changes to the ASOP group and some have been accepted. Interesting, we’ll soon have notebooks with Icecream on top.

collin0
User Rank
Author
re: Intel, Google don't support Android to PC port
collin0   12/6/2011 4:28:30 PM
NO RATINGS
Android OS, very popular in China now. Many projects start to choose android as the first option OS. I focus on embedded linux, as I know, the android is based on linux kernel, so i wonder why it is better than linux. If you want to use android, you must be familiar with Java language. It is boring for me, only have interest on C,so i still use linux to develop new embedded projects. Of course, not phone and tablet.

beyounn
User Rank
Author
re: Intel, Google don't support Android to PC port
beyounn   12/6/2011 7:32:18 AM
NO RATINGS
Woo ya, talking about taking advantage of others work, one of the intel guy took a patch from android-x86 and submit to ASOP under his name, what about that ?

selinz
User Rank
Author
re: Intel, Google don't support Android to PC port
selinz   12/5/2011 10:37:49 PM
NO RATINGS
With open source, it is likely for a 1 company (Intel) to make a large contribution to an effort and another company (AMD) to take advantage of their work. That's the nature of the beast. It sort of sounds like Intel is whining...

beyounn
User Rank
Author
re: Intel, Google don't support Android to PC port
beyounn   12/5/2011 9:02:45 PM
NO RATINGS
"Huang’s non-authorized version has not been submitted to Google for integration into the wider Android open source effort, which has raised concern that it could cause fragmentation." Whoever said this is totally misleading. Chih-wei has tried very hard to summit any of our changes to the ASOP and many of them have been accepted by the ASOP.

tabletsx86
User Rank
Author
re: Intel, Google don't support Android to PC port
tabletsx86   12/5/2011 8:28:35 PM
NO RATINGS
so you mean Intel really doesn't have a port like the android-x86.org project does??? Like MS old vaporware I guess..LOL

SylvieBarak
User Rank
Blogger
re: Intel, Google don't support Android to PC port
SylvieBarak   12/5/2011 8:11:42 PM
NO RATINGS
From the Android Open Source Project.

SylvieBarak
User Rank
Blogger
re: Intel, Google don't support Android to PC port
SylvieBarak   12/5/2011 8:11:19 PM
NO RATINGS
Because Google has it's Chrome OS for notebook form factors. Android is supposed to be for mobile Internet Devices only. Also, a lot of its functionality is a bit redundant without touchscreen.

tabletsx86
User Rank
Author
re: Intel, Google don't support Android to PC port
tabletsx86   12/5/2011 7:56:56 PM
NO RATINGS
"Android version 2.3.7 (Gingerbread) with Intel’s manager of the Google Program Office, Alec Gefrides" Where can one download a working version of this intel port???

krisi
User Rank
Author
re: Intel, Google don't support Android to PC port
krisi   12/5/2011 6:46:13 PM
NO RATINGS
why would Google not support this move?

<<   <   Page 2 / 3   >   >>


Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
As data rates begin to move beyond 25 Gbps channels, new problems arise. Getting to 50 Gbps channels might not be possible with the traditional NRZ (2-level) signaling. PAM4 lets data rates double with only a small increase in channel bandwidth by sending two bits per symbol. But, it brings new measurement and analysis problems. Signal integrity sage Ransom Stephens will explain how PAM4 differs from NRZ and what to expect in design, measurement, and signal analysis.

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...
The LT®3752/LT3752-1 are current mode PWM controllers ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...