Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 3 / 4   >   >>
rbarraud0
User Rank
Author
re: Nvidia: ARM supercomputer to be more efficient than x86
rbarraud0   12/7/2011 1:31:32 AM
NO RATINGS
So to extend your logic, any non-x86 architecture that exists, is superior to x86? ;-)

the lavender fan
User Rank
Author
re: Nvidia: ARM supercomputer to be more efficient than x86
the lavender fan   12/7/2011 1:14:35 AM
NO RATINGS
Where do these numbers come from?

the lavender fan
User Rank
Author
re: Nvidia: ARM supercomputer to be more efficient than x86
the lavender fan   12/7/2011 1:13:08 AM
NO RATINGS
Based on what criteria are you claiming that ARM architecture is superior? Intel and ARM make different tradeoffs when designing their processor cores. Usually Intel is more aggressive with performance, while ARM is more aggressive on power efficiency.

y_sasaki
User Rank
Author
re: Nvidia: ARM supercomputer to be more efficient than x86
y_sasaki   12/7/2011 12:48:53 AM
NO RATINGS
Because of its PC-based business model, x86 processors are spellbound to binary compatibility. Intel have to design processors to be able to run binary code written for 2 or 3 generations before - not only just "able" but fast and efficiently, because PC users will evaluate new processor performance with older generation of benchmark code. I believe intel can produce highly optimized high-performance processor, perhaps even better than ARM guys, but pressure from their mainstream PC market will not easily allow to do so.

krisi
User Rank
Author
re: Nvidia: ARM supercomputer to be more efficient than x86
krisi   12/7/2011 12:25:18 AM
NO RATINGS
Intel has a better technology Steven, always one or two generation ahead. Intel has better marketing, much larger budget than any other processor makers. So why would ARM exists at all if it didn't have a better architecture? Kris

SylvieBarak
User Rank
Blogger
re: Nvidia: ARM supercomputer to be more efficient than x86
SylvieBarak   12/7/2011 12:16:24 AM
NO RATINGS
Of course! Drop me an email to my first name, dot, last name at UBM dot com

Steven_Wu
User Rank
Author
re: Nvidia: ARM supercomputer to be more efficient than x86
Steven_Wu   12/7/2011 12:07:53 AM
NO RATINGS
I don't know it is safe to say architecturally ARM is superior. Is there any fundmental architecture difference between ARM and other RISCs? The ISA doesn't matter. Basically business model counts.

krisi
User Rank
Author
re: Nvidia: ARM supercomputer to be more efficient than x86
krisi   12/6/2011 11:22:17 PM
NO RATINGS
thank you Sylvie...we would be interested in having a talk on Barcelona design at emerging technologies conference in Vancouver in 2012? www.cmoset.com, would you be interested by any chance? Kris

krisi
User Rank
Author
re: Nvidia: ARM supercomputer to be more efficient than x86
krisi   12/6/2011 11:16:27 PM
NO RATINGS
I am not sure I agree Mike...yes, the process technology has been always helping Intel, so will 22nm process...but architecturally ARM is superior...is it an open question who will prevail 2-3 years from now, right now Intel is increasing their market share and revenue growth is really impressive! Kris

mike655mm
User Rank
Author
re: Nvidia: ARM supercomputer to be more efficient than x86
mike655mm   12/6/2011 11:07:34 PM
NO RATINGS
I'm siding with Intel on this one. They've been successful for over 40 years and they keep evolving and adapting. 22nm process technology is going to be a big winner with a lot less power and a much smaller chip size (cheaper). ARM will lose most of the power advantage they used to have and as technology continues to march towards 16nm, 10nm, etc, it'll no longer be a factor. It'll be about features, ease-of-use and performance

<<   <   Page 3 / 4   >   >>


Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
As data rates begin to move beyond 25 Gbps channels, new problems arise. Getting to 50 Gbps channels might not be possible with the traditional NRZ (2-level) signaling. PAM4 lets data rates double with only a small increase in channel bandwidth by sending two bits per symbol. But, it brings new measurement and analysis problems. Signal integrity sage Ransom Stephens will explain how PAM4 differs from NRZ and what to expect in design, measurement, and signal analysis.

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...
The LT®3752/LT3752-1 are current mode PWM controllers ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...