Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
t.alex
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel announces mobile and wireless reorganization
t.alex   12/27/2011 1:57:42 PM
NO RATINGS
What is the advantage of FINFET?

eewiz
User Rank
CEO
re: Intel announces mobile and wireless reorganization
eewiz   12/19/2011 5:31:50 PM
NO RATINGS
sooner or later, the mobile CPU will overtake the desktop CPU business in sales as the processing power of mobile CPUs becomes good enuf for most common tasks.

harisachin
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel announces mobile and wireless reorganization
harisachin   12/18/2011 7:39:11 PM
NO RATINGS
Intel got it's technology? x86 you mean? wow!

wilber_xbox
User Rank
CEO
re: Intel announces mobile and wireless reorganization
wilber_xbox   12/18/2011 3:17:01 PM
NO RATINGS
Intel may have lead on FinFET but other OEMs will start on FInFET pretty soon (within a year or two). So even if FinFET has lower leakage (i am not sure though) even then it is not enough.

wilber_xbox
User Rank
CEO
re: Intel announces mobile and wireless reorganization
wilber_xbox   12/18/2011 3:13:36 PM
NO RATINGS
But everyone would agree that Intel has missed the boat for the mobile and tablet segment. So, instead of chasing behind the boat Intel should come up with something more than just power efficient chips.

Sharath666
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel announces mobile and wireless reorganization
Sharath666   12/18/2011 6:57:05 AM
NO RATINGS
I think Intel are relying more on FINFET devices to lower power consumption rather than change their x86 architectures.

DataMuncher
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel announces mobile and wireless reorganization
DataMuncher   12/17/2011 6:42:24 PM
NO RATINGS
Seems like folks are missing another important distinction, at least in the short run, between true mobile products (smartphones and tablets) vs. the PC ilk (laptops, netbooks and desktops). There are two key elements to drastically reducing energy needs to reach the battery life goals for mobile - a power-sipping app processor - where today ARM still has a dramatic lead on both the dynamic and static/leakage side. - a power sipping memory system, which today means a small (500M-1GB note 32bit addressing is sufficient) SRAM system with small energy costs for each memory transaction (apps processor and memory packaged together). The upshot is that this also requires a specialized OS with power awareness, plus an extremely small footprint compared to PC land. So if Intel wants to make real headway in mobile in the short term, they have to succeed in a very different landscape, than PCland. A PC that uses "less power", is structurally handicapped by a 5x factor in terms of energy and battery life vs a comparable "small memory" mobile system. They have to stop producing "scaled down" hammers (Atoms) and move to making screwdrivers. And for all the folks who call for PC "backward compatibility" in the mobile space, please realize that that is the root of the power problem - a big memory system is anathema to a mobile device today, something even Microsoft has recognized for Windows 8.

t.alex
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel announces mobile and wireless reorganization
t.alex   12/16/2011 2:05:25 PM
NO RATINGS
It is still difficult to look for an intel development at low cost nowadays. ARM is everywhere.

agk
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel announces mobile and wireless reorganization
agk   12/16/2011 9:00:41 AM
NO RATINGS
The next big market to PC,laptop,notebook is mobile phones.Intel got its technology and can easily adopt to mobile phones.For Intel it will be viable due to high volume market

GroovyGeek
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel announces mobile and wireless reorganization
GroovyGeek   12/16/2011 6:28:57 AM
NO RATINGS
In the same way that ARM's obsession with LACK of backwards compatibility is the problem? The two platforms are rapidly converging. ARM basically sucks for anything but basic functionality but sips power. This has been OK for relatively dumb phones, but as the demands in performance and capabilities are coming up, so does the power consumption. Intel is moving in the opposite direction. Sooner or later the two are at the same place, and keep their respective markets due to incumbency. On a somewhat related note, can anyone explain why Intel wants to sell mobile chips that NOBODY makes money on? Protecting their market from below?

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Flash Poll
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

MSGEQ7-Based DIY Audio Spectrum Analyzer: Testing
Max Maxfield
13 comments
In my previous column on this topic, we discussed the step-by-step construction of the first pass at a MSGEQ7-based DIY audio spectrum analyzer for use in my BADASS Display project. Of ...

Karen Field

June 2014 Cartoon Caption Winner
Karen Field
13 comments
Congratulations to "Wnderer" for submitting the winning caption for our June cartoon, after much heated conversation by our judges, given the plethora of great entries.

Jeremy Cook

Inspection Rejection: Why More Is Less in a Vision System
Jeremy Cook
3 comments
Albert Einstein has been quoted as saying, "Everything should be as simple as possible, but not simpler." I would never claim to have his level of insight -- or such an awesome head of ...

Jeremy Cook

Machine Fixes That Made Me Go 'DUH!'
Jeremy Cook
21 comments
As you can see in my bio at the end of this article, I work as a manufacturing engineer. One of my favorite things that happens on a Friday late in the afternoon is to hear my phone ring ...

Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)