Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
t.alex
User Rank
Author
re: Intel announces mobile and wireless reorganization
t.alex   12/27/2011 1:57:42 PM
NO RATINGS
What is the advantage of FINFET?

eewiz
User Rank
Author
re: Intel announces mobile and wireless reorganization
eewiz   12/19/2011 5:31:50 PM
NO RATINGS
sooner or later, the mobile CPU will overtake the desktop CPU business in sales as the processing power of mobile CPUs becomes good enuf for most common tasks.

harisachin
User Rank
Author
re: Intel announces mobile and wireless reorganization
harisachin   12/18/2011 7:39:11 PM
NO RATINGS
Intel got it's technology? x86 you mean? wow!

wilber_xbox
User Rank
Author
re: Intel announces mobile and wireless reorganization
wilber_xbox   12/18/2011 3:17:01 PM
NO RATINGS
Intel may have lead on FinFET but other OEMs will start on FInFET pretty soon (within a year or two). So even if FinFET has lower leakage (i am not sure though) even then it is not enough.

wilber_xbox
User Rank
Author
re: Intel announces mobile and wireless reorganization
wilber_xbox   12/18/2011 3:13:36 PM
NO RATINGS
But everyone would agree that Intel has missed the boat for the mobile and tablet segment. So, instead of chasing behind the boat Intel should come up with something more than just power efficient chips.

Sharath666
User Rank
Author
re: Intel announces mobile and wireless reorganization
Sharath666   12/18/2011 6:57:05 AM
NO RATINGS
I think Intel are relying more on FINFET devices to lower power consumption rather than change their x86 architectures.

DataMuncher
User Rank
Author
re: Intel announces mobile and wireless reorganization
DataMuncher   12/17/2011 6:42:24 PM
NO RATINGS
Seems like folks are missing another important distinction, at least in the short run, between true mobile products (smartphones and tablets) vs. the PC ilk (laptops, netbooks and desktops). There are two key elements to drastically reducing energy needs to reach the battery life goals for mobile - a power-sipping app processor - where today ARM still has a dramatic lead on both the dynamic and static/leakage side. - a power sipping memory system, which today means a small (500M-1GB note 32bit addressing is sufficient) SRAM system with small energy costs for each memory transaction (apps processor and memory packaged together). The upshot is that this also requires a specialized OS with power awareness, plus an extremely small footprint compared to PC land. So if Intel wants to make real headway in mobile in the short term, they have to succeed in a very different landscape, than PCland. A PC that uses "less power", is structurally handicapped by a 5x factor in terms of energy and battery life vs a comparable "small memory" mobile system. They have to stop producing "scaled down" hammers (Atoms) and move to making screwdrivers. And for all the folks who call for PC "backward compatibility" in the mobile space, please realize that that is the root of the power problem - a big memory system is anathema to a mobile device today, something even Microsoft has recognized for Windows 8.

t.alex
User Rank
Author
re: Intel announces mobile and wireless reorganization
t.alex   12/16/2011 2:05:25 PM
NO RATINGS
It is still difficult to look for an intel development at low cost nowadays. ARM is everywhere.

agk
User Rank
Author
re: Intel announces mobile and wireless reorganization
agk   12/16/2011 9:00:41 AM
NO RATINGS
The next big market to PC,laptop,notebook is mobile phones.Intel got its technology and can easily adopt to mobile phones.For Intel it will be viable due to high volume market

GroovyGeek
User Rank
Author
re: Intel announces mobile and wireless reorganization
GroovyGeek   12/16/2011 6:28:57 AM
NO RATINGS
In the same way that ARM's obsession with LACK of backwards compatibility is the problem? The two platforms are rapidly converging. ARM basically sucks for anything but basic functionality but sips power. This has been OK for relatively dumb phones, but as the demands in performance and capabilities are coming up, so does the power consumption. Intel is moving in the opposite direction. Sooner or later the two are at the same place, and keep their respective markets due to incumbency. On a somewhat related note, can anyone explain why Intel wants to sell mobile chips that NOBODY makes money on? Protecting their market from below?

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
LEDs are being used in current luxury model automotive ...
With design sizes expected to increase by 5X through 2020, ...
01:48
Linear Technology’s LT8330 and LT8331, two Low Quiescent ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
05:27
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
05:18
Silego Technology’s highly versatile Mixed-signal GreenPAK ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
See the Virtex® UltraScale+™ FPGA with 32.75G backplane ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...