Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
SudsSutherland
User Rank
Rookie
re: An analyst's take on the Lam-Novellus deal
SudsSutherland   12/28/2011 4:45:07 PM
NO RATINGS
Too bad that Novellus screwed up the SpeedFam acquisition as at the time they had the "best" CMP platform. That would have completed the suite of process tools for the combined Lam-Novellus org as Dean accurately observes. This will generate very fun dialogue during next month's annual SEMI ISS program

motti2
User Rank
Rookie
re: An analyst's take on the Lam-Novellus deal
motti2   12/28/2011 11:26:02 AM
NO RATINGS
Since Dean missed the significance of the AMD Athlon when it was overtaking the clock limited Pentium 3, I posit here he misses that too many fab customers buy Applied Materials solutions just because it is from a company of Applied Materials size. TEL does not have the dynamism of any of these firms, in fact regularly lags on all kinds of execution metrics ( defensive postures ). A merger of Lam and Novellus is great (they both have silicon valley genes that have driven the industry), yet a merger can falter if teamwork is not fostered properly (not hard to do well despite Dean's second guessing with FUD), yet a merger also can win big for the combined firm with gaining a critical mass that is impossible to possess if they operate independently without merging. My take is the merger is a good opportunity for the combined firm to offer solutions to customers that will have greater appeal to the user base, from better support, better R&D and greater economies of scale. As prior long ago, - ignoring actual customer dynamics can lead to unjustified disparagement of a new opportunity - whether it was the heydey for AMD's competitive revival, or here the opportunity of synergy of a larger more competitive combined Lam/Novellus. They can mess up the opportunity as Dean emphasizes, yet my impression is they have every motivation to make a good go of it, and succeed to challenge AMAT where prior not taken seriously as independents due to the size of AMAT. Consulting firms are only as good as their comprehension of product and customer dynamics, with no bearing of influence by client relationships. I vote for Lam and Novellus combined to experience a good revival of impressive growth, far greater than Mr. Freeman seems to disparage. And I am a long time process engineer, hands on a predicted the success of the early Athlon that Dean disparaged for some unknown reasons long ago.



Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Book Review: Deadly Odds by Allen Wyler
Max Maxfield
10 comments
Generally speaking, when it comes to settling down with a good book, I tend to gravitate towards science fiction and science fantasy. Having said this, I do spend a lot of time reading ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
13 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).