Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
PJames
User Rank
Author
re: Ultrabooks: Strategic vision or just a pretty face?
PJames   1/15/2012 7:24:12 AM
NO RATINGS
Yeah, right... horrors that not everything in marketing is real. Next thing we'll learn is that adverts have paid actors.

resistion
User Rank
Author
re: Ultrabooks: Strategic vision or just a pretty face?
resistion   1/15/2012 4:21:59 AM
NO RATINGS
Too bad Intel had to stoop to do this: http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/10/intel-takes-heat-for-misleading-ultrabook-demo-at-ces-video/

PJames
User Rank
Author
re: Ultrabooks: Strategic vision or just a pretty face?
PJames   1/14/2012 8:59:46 PM
NO RATINGS
I just bought an ultrabook, and VGA and RJ45 ethernet were on my short list for needed features. BTW, its slimmer/lighter than an Airbook. That's one of the things I dislike about Apple. They get rid of ports people need simply because of their design "vision"... and then force you to carry various dongles to make up for lack of the connector. I don't know why one would want to be forced to "rely" on wireless.

WiLess
User Rank
Author
re: Ultrabooks: Strategic vision or just a pretty face?
WiLess   1/14/2012 12:39:34 AM
NO RATINGS
I currently have both Windows and Apple laptops in my family and I'd be happy if my Windows laptops will get lighter, thinner and screen-touchable keeping the same performance and capabilities. This trend was happening for a long time in fact. It is a good thing that it was realized by manufactures now. It also means that some bulky laptop features like DVD drive and VGA will go away and it will rely more on wireless, which I like both as a customer and a professional.

Tombo0
User Rank
Author
re: Ultrabooks: Strategic vision or just a pretty face?
Tombo0   1/13/2012 3:31:51 PM
NO RATINGS
sorry forgot the link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Office#Macintosh_versions

Tombo0
User Rank
Author
re: Ultrabooks: Strategic vision or just a pretty face?
Tombo0   1/13/2012 3:29:53 PM
NO RATINGS
The move to Intel was due to IBM not giving the performance they wanted on PowerPC. Office has run on Macs since 1989 and new Office usually comes out on Mac first (check Wikipedia)

resistion
User Rank
Author
re: Ultrabooks: Strategic vision or just a pretty face?
resistion   1/13/2012 3:19:07 AM
NO RATINGS
The trouble is the Ultrabook first impression won't be substantial. All the proposed "wow" type visionary changes are expected to happen over the next few years.

Bear1959
User Rank
Author
re: Ultrabooks: Strategic vision or just a pretty face?
Bear1959   1/12/2012 2:07:27 PM
NO RATINGS
It's past time now. All PC's (both laptops & desktops) should now have touchscreen as a standard. Gosh my $99 Kindle has a touchscreen. The cost is now low enougth.

przemek0
User Rank
Author
re: Ultrabooks: Strategic vision or just a pretty face?
przemek0   1/11/2012 10:37:51 PM
NO RATINGS
'Will Apple move to ARM?' It already did---iPads and iPhones and iPods have always been running on ARM. I suspect that the main reason for Intel CPU in MacBooks was Microsoft Office---MS seems to be very reluctant in cross-compiling their OS/apps.

pjduncan
User Rank
Author
re: Ultrabooks: Strategic vision or just a pretty face?
pjduncan   1/11/2012 8:28:03 PM
NO RATINGS
Whether it's a leadership strategy probably depends on whether you define leadership as being perceived as being on the cutting edge or simply market share. Companies can make a lot of money being competent fast followers. Some people will want to pony up the money to have the Apple branded product. Many will be willing to wait a few months and buy Android or Windows to get more choice and better prices.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
As data rates begin to move beyond 25 Gbps channels, new problems arise. Getting to 50 Gbps channels might not be possible with the traditional NRZ (2-level) signaling. PAM4 lets data rates double with only a small increase in channel bandwidth by sending two bits per symbol. But, it brings new measurement and analysis problems. Signal integrity sage Ransom Stephens will explain how PAM4 differs from NRZ and what to expect in design, measurement, and signal analysis.

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Most Recent Comments
HardwIntr
 
IJD
 
MWagner_MA
 
txicos
 
imadur
 
andybe
 
Bruzzer
 
Bruzzer
 
CB_EE
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...
The LT®3752/LT3752-1 are current mode PWM controllers ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...