Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
dan-nevill
User Rank
Rookie
re: East of ARM unimpressed with Medfield
dan-nevill   1/20/2012 9:27:50 PM
NO RATINGS
Intel can't buy ARM because it would give them a monopoly which is not allowed by competition laws

Vancouver
User Rank
Rookie
re: East of ARM unimpressed with Medfield
Vancouver   1/19/2012 5:02:14 AM
NO RATINGS
Not impressed. Please don't cry and whine Intel nomopoly when they start eating your market shares.

y_sasaki
User Rank
CEO
re: East of ARM unimpressed with Medfield
y_sasaki   1/18/2012 12:36:05 AM
NO RATINGS
Actually intel have tried to introduce non-x86 RISC architecture in 1990s; i860 and i960 family. They are truly innovative at the time (860 was first VILW, 960 was first superscaler in the market). 960 achieved some success in embedded application (860 was not a great success), but eventually overtaken by cheaper and higher-performance competitors (MIPS, PPC and ARM). After all, brand new architecture was not juicy for intel, compare to legacy x86, where they had definitive advantage in stable market. Well, those are things of past. It may be the time to intel to consider if they should stick with shrinking PC market or to make gamble on brand-new-architecture one more time.

chipmonk0
User Rank
Manager
re: East of ARM unimpressed with Medfield
chipmonk0   1/17/2012 9:31:41 PM
NO RATINGS
Is ARM looking for trouble ? Intel has enough in the Bank to start a competitor to ARM and squeeze ARM by giving designs away or even launch a hostile takeover to shut them up ...

wave.forest
User Rank
Manager
re: East of ARM unimpressed with Medfield
wave.forest   1/17/2012 3:15:58 PM
NO RATINGS
It appears that people have fogotten that ARM and other "embedded" processor vendors are all the desktop/PC losers against Intel. Intel didn't go to embedded market because PC market was very profitabl. Now it is the face-off time.

elctrnx_lyf
User Rank
Manager
re: East of ARM unimpressed with Medfield
elctrnx_lyf   1/17/2012 1:09:43 PM
NO RATINGS
ARM is leading already a big way in the tablet and smartphone market. It would be very touch to Intel to knock off the ARM strength anytime soon.

Neo10
User Rank
Rookie
re: East of ARM unimpressed with Medfield
Neo10   1/17/2012 2:02:09 AM
NO RATINGS
The baggage of legacy weighs too heavily on intel. While they are at it ARM is sneaking from behind on the big $$ of IT, though it is still a potshot as of today.

sharps_eng
User Rank
Rookie
re: East of ARM unimpressed with Medfield
sharps_eng   1/16/2012 11:14:15 PM
NO RATINGS
Can anyone be specific about what Intel is offering in terms of architectural innovation? ARM used the approach of elegant simplification right from the start, and to my knowledge haven't diverted from that very much. It is a virtuous circle, although one might expect diminishing returns at some point. Intel have innovated their processes and silicon design, but their architectures seem to need all the help they can get from the boys in the basement. I never understood why they couldn't make a go of RISC, they spun out their ARM licensing experiment to Marvell I believe. Maybe corporate Intel can't get over the 'not invented here' hurdle, or maybe Intel's architecture department doesn't contain any software gurus? I think they should look at what they do well (silicon), and what they do clumsily (architecture) and get focussed, either with some proper partnerships or invest in a proper architectural skunkworks (like Acorn Computers did when they created ARM). Mind you, Intel's peripheral (chipset) architecture teams are pretty good. They have had to be, innovating while carrying all that legacy stuff.

KB3001
User Rank
CEO
re: East of ARM unimpressed with Medfield
KB3001   1/16/2012 10:50:45 PM
NO RATINGS
Quite right, competition is always good for consumers. I personally doubt Intel will make big inroads into the mobile market, but their mere presence can only be a good thing for competition.

BLinder
User Rank
Rookie
re: East of ARM unimpressed with Medfield
BLinder   1/16/2012 6:46:42 PM
NO RATINGS
A few things to consider, first when competition exists ... the market creates more innovation. Intel has fab technology to push products into a regime that is leaving most ODM companies behind. So if we all wish to enjoy those cutting edge products into the future, I would be cheering for Intel to keep the spirit alive. Otherwise we will all be stuck with our mobile devices running apps on slow coventional CPU products.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Vetinari Clock: Decisions, Decisions, Decisions …
Max Maxfield
22 comments
Things are bouncing merrily along with regard to my uber-cool Vetinari Clock project. The wooden cabinet is being handcrafted by my chum Bob (a master carpenter) using an amazing ...

Jolt Judges and Andrew Binstock

Jolt Awards: The Best Books
Jolt Judges and Andrew Binstock
1 Comment
As we do every year, Dr. Dobb's recognizes the best books of the last 12 months via the Jolt Awards -- our cycle of product awards given out every two months in each of six categories. No ...

Engineering Investigations

Air Conditioner Falls From Window, Still Works
Engineering Investigations
2 comments
It's autumn in New England. The leaves are turning to red, orange, and gold, my roses are in their second bloom, and it's time to remove the air conditioner from the window. On September ...

David Blaza

The Other Tesla
David Blaza
5 comments
I find myself going to Kickstarter and Indiegogo on a regular basis these days because they have become real innovation marketplaces. As far as I'm concerned, this is where a lot of cool ...