Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
dan-nevill
User Rank
Rookie
re: East of ARM unimpressed with Medfield
dan-nevill   1/20/2012 9:27:50 PM
NO RATINGS
Intel can't buy ARM because it would give them a monopoly which is not allowed by competition laws

Vancouver
User Rank
Rookie
re: East of ARM unimpressed with Medfield
Vancouver   1/19/2012 5:02:14 AM
NO RATINGS
Not impressed. Please don't cry and whine Intel nomopoly when they start eating your market shares.

y_sasaki
User Rank
CEO
re: East of ARM unimpressed with Medfield
y_sasaki   1/18/2012 12:36:05 AM
NO RATINGS
Actually intel have tried to introduce non-x86 RISC architecture in 1990s; i860 and i960 family. They are truly innovative at the time (860 was first VILW, 960 was first superscaler in the market). 960 achieved some success in embedded application (860 was not a great success), but eventually overtaken by cheaper and higher-performance competitors (MIPS, PPC and ARM). After all, brand new architecture was not juicy for intel, compare to legacy x86, where they had definitive advantage in stable market. Well, those are things of past. It may be the time to intel to consider if they should stick with shrinking PC market or to make gamble on brand-new-architecture one more time.

chipmonk0
User Rank
CEO
re: East of ARM unimpressed with Medfield
chipmonk0   1/17/2012 9:31:41 PM
NO RATINGS
Is ARM looking for trouble ? Intel has enough in the Bank to start a competitor to ARM and squeeze ARM by giving designs away or even launch a hostile takeover to shut them up ...

wave.forest
User Rank
Manager
re: East of ARM unimpressed with Medfield
wave.forest   1/17/2012 3:15:58 PM
NO RATINGS
It appears that people have fogotten that ARM and other "embedded" processor vendors are all the desktop/PC losers against Intel. Intel didn't go to embedded market because PC market was very profitabl. Now it is the face-off time.

elctrnx_lyf
User Rank
Manager
re: East of ARM unimpressed with Medfield
elctrnx_lyf   1/17/2012 1:09:43 PM
NO RATINGS
ARM is leading already a big way in the tablet and smartphone market. It would be very touch to Intel to knock off the ARM strength anytime soon.

Neo10
User Rank
Rookie
re: East of ARM unimpressed with Medfield
Neo10   1/17/2012 2:02:09 AM
NO RATINGS
The baggage of legacy weighs too heavily on intel. While they are at it ARM is sneaking from behind on the big $$ of IT, though it is still a potshot as of today.

sharps_eng
User Rank
Rookie
re: East of ARM unimpressed with Medfield
sharps_eng   1/16/2012 11:14:15 PM
NO RATINGS
Can anyone be specific about what Intel is offering in terms of architectural innovation? ARM used the approach of elegant simplification right from the start, and to my knowledge haven't diverted from that very much. It is a virtuous circle, although one might expect diminishing returns at some point. Intel have innovated their processes and silicon design, but their architectures seem to need all the help they can get from the boys in the basement. I never understood why they couldn't make a go of RISC, they spun out their ARM licensing experiment to Marvell I believe. Maybe corporate Intel can't get over the 'not invented here' hurdle, or maybe Intel's architecture department doesn't contain any software gurus? I think they should look at what they do well (silicon), and what they do clumsily (architecture) and get focussed, either with some proper partnerships or invest in a proper architectural skunkworks (like Acorn Computers did when they created ARM). Mind you, Intel's peripheral (chipset) architecture teams are pretty good. They have had to be, innovating while carrying all that legacy stuff.

KB3001
User Rank
CEO
re: East of ARM unimpressed with Medfield
KB3001   1/16/2012 10:50:45 PM
NO RATINGS
Quite right, competition is always good for consumers. I personally doubt Intel will make big inroads into the mobile market, but their mere presence can only be a good thing for competition.

BLinder
User Rank
Rookie
re: East of ARM unimpressed with Medfield
BLinder   1/16/2012 6:46:42 PM
NO RATINGS
A few things to consider, first when competition exists ... the market creates more innovation. Intel has fab technology to push products into a regime that is leaving most ODM companies behind. So if we all wish to enjoy those cutting edge products into the future, I would be cheering for Intel to keep the spirit alive. Otherwise we will all be stuck with our mobile devices running apps on slow coventional CPU products.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Flash Poll
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

MSGEQ7-Based DIY Audio Spectrum Analyzer: Testing
Max Maxfield
13 comments
In my previous column on this topic, we discussed the step-by-step construction of the first pass at a MSGEQ7-based DIY audio spectrum analyzer for use in my BADASS Display project. Of ...

Karen Field

June 2014 Cartoon Caption Winner
Karen Field
13 comments
Congratulations to "Wnderer" for submitting the winning caption for our June cartoon, after much heated conversation by our judges, given the plethora of great entries.

Jeremy Cook

Inspection Rejection: Why More Is Less in a Vision System
Jeremy Cook
3 comments
Albert Einstein has been quoted as saying, "Everything should be as simple as possible, but not simpler." I would never claim to have his level of insight -- or such an awesome head of ...

Jeremy Cook

Machine Fixes That Made Me Go 'DUH!'
Jeremy Cook
21 comments
As you can see in my bio at the end of this article, I work as a manufacturing engineer. One of my favorite things that happens on a Friday late in the afternoon is to hear my phone ring ...

Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)