Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
markhahn0
User Rank
Author
re: Not All MLC SSDs are created equal
markhahn0   11/15/2012 5:04:49 PM
NO RATINGS
where did this figure of 30 full-device writes per day come from? I'm sure there's a market for that, but it has to be fairly small. obviously, most storage and computation is more consumer-like, with read-mostly loads, and often much sparser duty cycles than 24x7. it's easy to find very cheap SSDs today that peak at 500 MB/s and 80k iops and still offer 3-5 year warranties. commodity storage is cheap enough to simply use above-device redundancy to solve issues of reliability and permanence. STEC's pitch seems to be pretty intensive engineering at the device level - laudable, but do people buy these inherently more expensive (and apparently slower) devices and trust them without any above-device redundancy (raid, etc)?

DrWattsOn
User Rank
Author
re: Not All MLC SSDs are created equal
DrWattsOn   2/5/2012 6:08:41 PM
NO RATINGS
Agreed about FRAM: love the idea, but I doubt density will reach levels high enough for use in computers as Storage: maybe BIOS/EUFI. I like the materials from STEC, but not able to find any products identified as containing their technology, even searching all their links. Looks like vaporware to me.

sharps_eng
User Rank
Author
re: Not All MLC SSDs are created equal
sharps_eng   1/22/2012 8:36:52 PM
NO RATINGS
This technology illustrates the pressure to create workarounds for the recent Moore's Law crunch that means smaller geometries are not appearing fast enough to meet demand. Previous EDC/ECC and other flash-'nursing' initiatives failed because bigger chips appeared that allowed the protection to be implemented at a higher level, in software. Hardware was only necessary for custom high-integrity applications. STEC have a window of opportunity to make MLC work for a wider range of applications before a memory breakthrough pushes the density up again cheaply enough to compete. But is that breakthrough in sight? I personally love FRAM but can it be made dense enough? I think not. Production will also only be available when a big fab becomes surplus to DRAM or flash requirements. No-one will build a fab for FRAM speculatively, I think. Perhaps a slowdown will create spare FAB capacity?



Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
LEDs are being used in current luxury model automotive ...
With design sizes expected to increase by 5X through 2020, ...
01:48
Linear Technology’s LT8330 and LT8331, two Low Quiescent ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
05:27
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
05:18
Silego Technology’s highly versatile Mixed-signal GreenPAK ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
See the Virtex® UltraScale+™ FPGA with 32.75G backplane ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...