Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
DrZuhoch
User Rank
Rookie
re: What were they thinking: patent trolling patent
DrZuhoch   3/22/2012 2:35:13 PM
NO RATINGS
The USPTO is now a self-supported entity, and must survive by generated fees.A fee will be charged for reviewing the patent, which will always be refused the first time,so the reasons for denial will have to be challenged, which will send it back again for review of the challenge.This process can continue ad-nauseum until all possible fees have been extracted before ultimately approving or disapproving it. $$$ for USPTO.

old account Frank Eory
User Rank
Rookie
re: What were they thinking: patent trolling patent
old account Frank Eory   2/15/2012 10:13:49 PM
NO RATINGS
Many patents are granted that fail the novelty test.

Barry_Moss
User Rank
Rookie
re: What were they thinking: patent trolling patent
Barry_Moss   2/15/2012 9:56:49 PM
NO RATINGS
Somehow I think this one will fail the prior art test. The fact that it wasn't immediately tossed out unfortunately says a lot about the USPTO.

docdivakar
User Rank
Manager
re: What were they thinking: patent trolling patent
docdivakar   2/13/2012 10:28:06 PM
NO RATINGS
Seems like it is taking a bite out of patent lawyers' livelihood! I am sure there will be many challenges to this... oh well, looks like Bilsky vs. State Street Bank and all that machine vs. transformation discussion will flare up again!! MP Divakar

RWatkins
User Rank
Rookie
re: What were they thinking: patent trolling patent
RWatkins   2/9/2012 3:56:56 PM
NO RATINGS
Cool published application, BUT that is not a granted patent. In short, it is presently words on paper with priority for being granted over words generated later. However, the fact that the application was published only means that it languished for a year, not that it has any merit or that it may/may-not issue. We will have to see if intelligence prevails at the USPTO in terms of whether this really does become a patent. It is my understanding that if even one example exists of someone else using the claimed methods 6 month prior to the application, even if it otherwise could be granted, that novelty fails. SURELY there are such sharks in the patent trolling waters.

Eric.Jacobsen_#2
User Rank
Rookie
re: What were they thinking: patent trolling patent
Eric.Jacobsen_#2   2/8/2012 5:53:30 PM
NO RATINGS
That's brilliant. Essentially they've cornered the market on patent trolling, so as a defensive measure it's awesome. A troll can't bother them without violating their patent, and, assuming this is ever enforcable, no patent troll can operate again without violating this or obtaining a license. Somebody should have done this a long time ago. ;)



EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

How to Fly Without Catching the Dreaded Lurgy?
Max Maxfield
20 comments
I am currently not wearing my happy face. In fact, I am a "poorly soldier," as my mother would say when I was a little lad.

EDN Staff

11 Summer Vacation Spots for Engineers
EDN Staff
19 comments
This collection of places from technology history, museums, and modern marvels is a roadmap for an engineering adventure that will take you around the world. Here are just a few spots ...

Glen Chenier

Engineers Solve Analog/Digital Problem, Invent Creative Expletives
Glen Chenier
15 comments
- An analog engineer and a digital engineer join forces, use their respective skills, and pull a few bunnies out of a hat to troubleshoot a system with which they are completely ...

Larry Desjardin

Engineers Should Study Finance: 5 Reasons Why
Larry Desjardin
45 comments
I'm a big proponent of engineers learning financial basics. Why? Because engineers are making decisions all the time, in multiple ways. Having a good financial understanding guides these ...

Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)