Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
docdivakar
User Rank
CEO
re: Design networks for wireless M2M applications
docdivakar   2/15/2012 7:59:33 PM
NO RATINGS
Bert, thanks for the comments, the link you posted at IETF doesn't work; this one does: http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/manet/charter/ I believe the author does distinguish between 'mesh' or P2P and star networks by stating the fact the most mesh networks function as star's most of the time. You are also right in your observation that star networks are not self-healing while P2P are. I also believe that most M2M implementations in industrial automation will end up being star networks. MP Divakar

Kinnar
User Rank
CEO
re: Design networks for wireless M2M applications
Kinnar   2/10/2012 8:47:35 AM
NO RATINGS
It is very much required protocol which is expected in the talk above, this is also a major research area in ad-hoc networks. Routing over wireless is a stringent matter that will require few years to become optimal.

Bert22306
User Rank
CEO
re: Design networks for wireless M2M applications
Bert22306   2/10/2012 12:49:06 AM
NO RATINGS
I was having a difficult time understanding this, until I figured that perhaps "mesh" and "star," to describe network topologies, were being used interchangeably? A network configured as an RF mesh is a network in which each client node can behave as a router, filling in areas that would otherwise not have coverage. (See for example the MANET working group of the IETF, http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/manet/.) Instead in a star network, as the article points out, each client node needs to be within range of the hub (server node?), or within range of a router (which in turn is within range of the hub). I certainly agree that stars are simple. However they are not self-healing, as a mesh would be, and they limit bandwidth of the network to whatever the single hub can carry. As the article describes. So, the M2M functions such networks can carry are quite limited. I continue to believe that this recent popularization of the term "M2M" only describes a very small subset of actual machine to machine comms that exist. For instance, any kind of distributed control system.



Most Recent Comments
Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Book Review: Deadly Odds by Allen Wyler
Max Maxfield
11 comments
Generally speaking, when it comes to settling down with a good book, I tend to gravitate towards science fiction and science fantasy. Having said this, I do spend a lot of time reading ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
14 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).