Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
RWatkins
User Rank
Rookie
re: Counterfeit parts putting military at risk
RWatkins   2/22/2012 4:08:25 PM
NO RATINGS
Most of this discussion seems to swirl around one specific source of counterfeit parts. Perhaps the military and Congress should consider a specific restriction to prevent ANY parts from that country until counterfeit issues are resolved there. Similar issues have existed with medical materials from there, as was shown a few years with Heparin quality problems manufactured with organic source materials that were contaminated with WWII-era-developed antibiotics. When will we stop thinking that we "can't afford to have it made in the USA", when our very lives may depend on doing so?

KB3001
User Rank
CEO
re: Counterfeit parts putting military at risk
KB3001   2/22/2012 10:50:53 AM
NO RATINGS
We need a secure way to identify and authenticate uncolnable electronic devices. The technology is there but it entails extra cost, which I am not sure the industry is prepared to pay ... yet.

phoenixdave
User Rank
Rookie
re: Counterfeit parts putting military at risk
phoenixdave   2/20/2012 4:31:44 PM
NO RATINGS
The term "Counterfeit parts" would also require clarification to determine where the solution to the problem lies. If a part does not meet the specifications for the application, but is marked and identified as such, is that considered counterfeit? Or are these parts truly "reverse engineered" and re-manufactured to a lower standard and quality? Solutions could be completely different for each.

eeko
User Rank
Rookie
re: Counterfeit parts putting military at risk
eeko   2/20/2012 8:38:18 AM
NO RATINGS
Elemental fingerprinting is a fast, non-destructive technique that could provide low cost test method for detecting counterfeit components. This solution is being deployed by some defense contractors. I agree that critical military components should only be manufactured in USA

DrQuine
User Rank
CEO
re: Counterfeit parts putting military at risk
DrQuine   2/18/2012 4:55:40 AM
NO RATINGS
The Levin-McCain amendment to the 2012 NDAA includes "used" components which are claimed to be "new" within the definition of counterfeit parts. While they certainly are undesirable, potentially dangerous, and cheat the buyer, they don't fit my definition of "counterfeit". "Misrepresented" or "non-compliant" might be better descriptions. Knowing what portion of the statistics are based upon "used" components being misrepresented as "new" might help guide efforts to address the problem.

DoctorDoom
User Rank
Rookie
re: Counterfeit parts putting military at risk
DoctorDoom   2/16/2012 8:49:15 PM
NO RATINGS
Thank You EE Times for articles like this ... in the beginning ... when FAB or Not to FAB (???), questions were coming up ... the arguments to keep production close to main company were Control & Quality over what was being produced ... The Experts said that when everything was out-sourced - Control & Quality would NOT be a problem ... The Experts won but i think we were all lied to !

George Karalias
User Rank
Rookie
re: Counterfeit parts putting military at risk
George Karalias   2/16/2012 4:40:50 PM
NO RATINGS
Good article. There's a lot of manufacturing coming back to the US. This trend will probably gain momentum.

pixies
User Rank
Rookie
re: Counterfeit parts putting military at risk
pixies   2/16/2012 3:22:26 PM
NO RATINGS
The Russians said their Martian probe crashed before leaving earth's orbit because a counterfeit electronic part from China. But is not realistic to use US made, or Russia made for that matter, parts, lot of things are NOT made in US anymore.

phoenixdave
User Rank
Rookie
re: Counterfeit parts putting military at risk
phoenixdave   2/16/2012 1:58:36 PM
NO RATINGS
That's probably true for many components within the supply chain of many military products. As the world becomes more interconnected, the superpowers will no longer be those that have the bombs and missiles, etc. It will be those that "manufacture" the products of peace and war.

phoenixdave
User Rank
Rookie
re: Counterfeit parts putting military at risk
phoenixdave   2/16/2012 1:53:19 PM
NO RATINGS
Although that used to be the case, that is no longer possible. We used to have the facilities to manufacture "security critical" chips at some government-owned facilities, but those have fallen due to budgetary issues. And it would not be possible to currently manufacture ALL "mission critical" IC's in the States, the resources just are not there anymore.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Flash Poll
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Juggling a Cornucopia of Projects
Max Maxfield
Post a comment
I feel like I'm juggling a lot of hobby projects at the moment. The problem is that I can't juggle. Actually, that's not strictly true -- I can juggle ten fine china dinner plates, but ...

Karen Field

June 2014 Cartoon Caption Winner
Karen Field
13 comments
Congratulations to "Wnderer" for submitting the winning caption for our June cartoon, after much heated conversation by our judges, given the plethora of great entries.

Jeremy Cook

Inspection Rejection: Why More Is Less in a Vision System
Jeremy Cook
3 comments
Albert Einstein has been quoted as saying, "Everything should be as simple as possible, but not simpler." I would never claim to have his level of insight -- or such an awesome head of ...

Jeremy Cook

Machine Fixes That Made Me Go 'DUH!'
Jeremy Cook
21 comments
As you can see in my bio at the end of this article, I work as a manufacturing engineer. One of my favorite things that happens on a Friday late in the afternoon is to hear my phone ring ...

Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)