Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
RWatkins
User Rank
Rookie
re: Counterfeit parts putting military at risk
RWatkins   2/22/2012 4:08:25 PM
NO RATINGS
Most of this discussion seems to swirl around one specific source of counterfeit parts. Perhaps the military and Congress should consider a specific restriction to prevent ANY parts from that country until counterfeit issues are resolved there. Similar issues have existed with medical materials from there, as was shown a few years with Heparin quality problems manufactured with organic source materials that were contaminated with WWII-era-developed antibiotics. When will we stop thinking that we "can't afford to have it made in the USA", when our very lives may depend on doing so?

KB3001
User Rank
CEO
re: Counterfeit parts putting military at risk
KB3001   2/22/2012 10:50:53 AM
NO RATINGS
We need a secure way to identify and authenticate uncolnable electronic devices. The technology is there but it entails extra cost, which I am not sure the industry is prepared to pay ... yet.

phoenixdave
User Rank
Rookie
re: Counterfeit parts putting military at risk
phoenixdave   2/20/2012 4:31:44 PM
NO RATINGS
The term "Counterfeit parts" would also require clarification to determine where the solution to the problem lies. If a part does not meet the specifications for the application, but is marked and identified as such, is that considered counterfeit? Or are these parts truly "reverse engineered" and re-manufactured to a lower standard and quality? Solutions could be completely different for each.

eeko
User Rank
Rookie
re: Counterfeit parts putting military at risk
eeko   2/20/2012 8:38:18 AM
NO RATINGS
Elemental fingerprinting is a fast, non-destructive technique that could provide low cost test method for detecting counterfeit components. This solution is being deployed by some defense contractors. I agree that critical military components should only be manufactured in USA

DrQuine
User Rank
CEO
re: Counterfeit parts putting military at risk
DrQuine   2/18/2012 4:55:40 AM
NO RATINGS
The Levin-McCain amendment to the 2012 NDAA includes "used" components which are claimed to be "new" within the definition of counterfeit parts. While they certainly are undesirable, potentially dangerous, and cheat the buyer, they don't fit my definition of "counterfeit". "Misrepresented" or "non-compliant" might be better descriptions. Knowing what portion of the statistics are based upon "used" components being misrepresented as "new" might help guide efforts to address the problem.

DoctorDoom
User Rank
Rookie
re: Counterfeit parts putting military at risk
DoctorDoom   2/16/2012 8:49:15 PM
NO RATINGS
Thank You EE Times for articles like this ... in the beginning ... when FAB or Not to FAB (???), questions were coming up ... the arguments to keep production close to main company were Control & Quality over what was being produced ... The Experts said that when everything was out-sourced - Control & Quality would NOT be a problem ... The Experts won but i think we were all lied to !

George Karalias
User Rank
Rookie
re: Counterfeit parts putting military at risk
George Karalias   2/16/2012 4:40:50 PM
NO RATINGS
Good article. There's a lot of manufacturing coming back to the US. This trend will probably gain momentum.

pixies
User Rank
Rookie
re: Counterfeit parts putting military at risk
pixies   2/16/2012 3:22:26 PM
NO RATINGS
The Russians said their Martian probe crashed before leaving earth's orbit because a counterfeit electronic part from China. But is not realistic to use US made, or Russia made for that matter, parts, lot of things are NOT made in US anymore.

phoenixdave
User Rank
Rookie
re: Counterfeit parts putting military at risk
phoenixdave   2/16/2012 1:58:36 PM
NO RATINGS
That's probably true for many components within the supply chain of many military products. As the world becomes more interconnected, the superpowers will no longer be those that have the bombs and missiles, etc. It will be those that "manufacture" the products of peace and war.

phoenixdave
User Rank
Rookie
re: Counterfeit parts putting military at risk
phoenixdave   2/16/2012 1:53:19 PM
NO RATINGS
Although that used to be the case, that is no longer possible. We used to have the facilities to manufacture "security critical" chips at some government-owned facilities, but those have fallen due to budgetary issues. And it would not be possible to currently manufacture ALL "mission critical" IC's in the States, the resources just are not there anymore.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Book Review: Deadly Odds by Allen Wyler
Max Maxfield
11 comments
Generally speaking, when it comes to settling down with a good book, I tend to gravitate towards science fiction and science fantasy. Having said this, I do spend a lot of time reading ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
14 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).