It appears they have solved the 32-nm issues. They say that they have dramatically increased the shipments of AMD's 32-nm APUs.
Will they continue to work together? There is much discussion here about their continuing strategic partnership, etc. But AMD is basically shelling out more than half a million dollars, including relinquishing its stake in GF, in order to gain the right to use another foundry at 28-nm. So what does that say?
Samsungs Logic/Foundry technology is part of IBM's fab club.
One might also recall the announcement of both Samsung and GF offering a "synchronised" 28 nm technology what is based on mentioned fab club.
@Dr_Trevorkian- I found this an interesting question and posed it directly to an AMD spokesman. The spokesman reported that the amended deal with Globalfoundries has no implications for its x86 license from Intel. "We have the ability to produce processors anywhere we chose from the perspective of the cross license," the spokesman said.
It is interesting because I remember that when they spun off Global Foundries they took a 51% share in it, and had the requirement of having a majority of board members. This was due to the cross licensing agreement, although this may have changed especially with the anti-trust settlement with Intel.
I don't believe that AMD had 51 percent stake originally. Even if you go back to the initial announcement in October 2008, AMD was only going to have about 44 percent of what was then called "The Foundry Company," while ATIC owned by 56 percent.
Reports about a TSMC production stoppage at 28-nm appear to have been originated by the aptly named Semi Accurate. We are checking into it.
@phoenixdave (and everyone else)-I've done some checking, and it's my assessment that this report about TSMC halting 28-nm production is inaccurate (not even semi-accurate).
Certainly, TSMC has had some hiccups at 28-nm. But halting production several weeks ago? I don't think so.
TSMC said its policy is not to comment on rumors. But a spokeswoman for the company, Elizabeth Sun, also told me via email that 28-nm production is normal and that customers are fully aware of TSMC's production status.
It was also pointed out to me when I asked around about this that both Xilinx and rival Altera have within the past week or so issued announcements about 28-nm products shipping.
Both use TSMC for manufacturing. Why would either of these companies trumpet 28-nm production if they knew that their foundry supplier had shut down it's 28-nm production lines? I don't see it.
As we unveil EE Times’ 2015 Silicon 60 list, journalist & Silicon 60 researcher Peter Clarke hosts a conversation on startups in the electronics industry. Panelists Dan Armbrust (investment firm Silicon Catalyst), Andrew Kau (venture capital firm Walden International), and Stan Boland (successful serial entrepreneur, former CEO of Neul, Icera) join in the live debate.