Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 2
DrQuine
User Rank
Author
re: U.S. to begin testing future drones
DrQuine   3/11/2012 9:47:47 PM
NO RATINGS
"Rule 1 for drones: ensure the benefit they provide to society is greater than the risk they pose." I don't see how drones of any significant weight can logically be allowed in any populated area unless they provide a significant benefit. Not only can they not sign up to the Laws of Robotics, they can't possibly maintain total situational awareness (what about that MediVac helicopter coming in from above to rescue someone from a car crash)? Add in unexpected failures (collision with an large unregulated bird, need to avoid human crowds during a crash when the remote electronics fail) and maintaining acceptable levels of safety become challenging.

sharps_eng
User Rank
Author
re: U.S. to begin testing future drones
sharps_eng   3/11/2012 8:13:56 PM
NO RATINGS
I don't see how a heavier-than-air drone can possibly sign up to the Laws of Robotics, except by refusing to fly. Sooner they get their own union, the better. Am I missing something ? ;-)

Rjs725
User Rank
Author
re: U.S. to begin testing future drones
Rjs725   3/11/2012 7:42:19 PM
NO RATINGS
They should have their technology powered by iPads. That would sweet to add. http://detectapple.com/ipad-demand-of-the-charts-according-to-apple/

KB3001
User Rank
Author
re: U.S. to begin testing future drones
KB3001   3/10/2012 9:12:01 AM
NO RATINGS
Standard anti-collision technology is also a must on any civilian drone.

KB3001
User Rank
Author
re: U.S. to begin testing future drones
KB3001   3/10/2012 9:07:35 AM
NO RATINGS
There are all sorts of technical, ethical and legal issues involved here. I think we should proceed very carefully by granting licenses on a limited scale (limited area and time span) for law enforcement and environment protection authorities. 4-5 years from this, we can perhaps start discussing widening the circle. PS. I also think public representatives from local communities must be involved in the granting of licenses...

Duane Benson
User Rank
Author
re: U.S. to begin testing future drones
Duane Benson   3/10/2012 8:50:43 AM
NO RATINGS
There certainly are plenty of good non-war applications for pilot-less aircraft in the US. Pipeline inspection as well as railroad inspection come to mind. Wild fire spotting was mentioned in the article. With the right sensor package, search and Rescue could also benefit. Unfortunately, these and all of the others may very well put pilots out of a job. But as with other technologies, such replacement of humans will happen whether we like it or not.

mickinuk
User Rank
Author
re: U.S. to begin testing future drones
mickinuk   3/10/2012 2:41:50 AM
NO RATINGS
There also a huge difference between a 10lb small plane and a 1,000lb monster when they fall out of the sky. Regulation can be a lot simpler when the pilot is sitting in the plan and risking his life, it tends to moderate the risk.

RTewell
User Rank
Author
re: U.S. to begin testing future drones
RTewell   3/10/2012 1:52:34 AM
NO RATINGS
Lots more to this than warfare... The real question is when does it move from a "model airplane" type of regulatory situation and into a "professional use" type of regulatory situation. Unintended consequences could have the FAA creating a situation where hobbyists can no longer fly model airplanes, rockets, helicopters, multi rotors, etc. Is the difference when a camera is placed on board? Or when they can fly further than x miles semi-autonomously? Or is it an altitude thing? What exactly is in the public safety? I hope there isn't a knee jerk reaction by the FAA...this needs to be carefully thought out.

goafrit
User Rank
Author
re: U.S. to begin testing future drones
goafrit   3/9/2012 9:05:14 PM
NO RATINGS
That is the future of warfare and U.S. seems prepared for it.

<<   <   Page 2 / 2


Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST

What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Are the design challenges the same as with embedded systems, but with a little developer- and IT-skills added in? What do engineers need to know? Rick Merritt talks with two experts about the tools and best options for designing IoT devices in 2016. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
05:27
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
05:18
Silego Technology’s highly versatile Mixed-signal GreenPAK ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
See the Virtex® UltraScale+™ FPGA with 32.75G backplane ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...