Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 3 / 5   >   >>
KB3001
User Rank
CEO
re: Intel exec says fabless model “collapsing”
KB3001   4/28/2012 11:10:20 AM
NO RATINGS
Correct. Beyond CPU, Intel does not have much scale advantage and they should (and are) very worried indeed. This bravado from Mr Bohr et al. is not fooling us....

KB3001
User Rank
CEO
re: Intel exec says fabless model “collapsing”
KB3001   4/28/2012 11:05:11 AM
NO RATINGS
Absolutely, what Mr Bohr is saying here is pure chauvisnism IMO. Instead of predicting the demise of the fabless/foundry model, he should have simply predicted much closer tie-up between fabless companies and foundries in the future e.g. through joint ventures.

selinz
User Rank
CEO
re: Intel exec says fabless model “collapsing”
selinz   4/27/2012 3:58:44 PM
NO RATINGS
I'm surpised to see such grandiose claims from an Intel spokesman. They have a huge talented work force and history doesn't validate a previous commenter's claim that they don't innovate. As long as your factories are running and you've got high margin products, no need to dump capacity to others and enable your competitors.

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
re: Intel exec says fabless model “collapsing”
rick merritt   4/27/2012 5:19:03 AM
NO RATINGS
Speaking of booze, let's grab a beer sometime ;-)

andyzg
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel exec says fabless model “collapsing”
andyzg   4/26/2012 8:37:30 AM
NO RATINGS
bohr's view is narrow in the sense that he assumes high quantity products. however, once the scaling ends slowly, the design matters more, and increasingly differentiated designs are used for different applications. NRE will matter a lot. bohr should be worried about having only one customer.

PV-Geek
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel exec says fabless model “collapsing”
PV-Geek   4/26/2012 2:29:12 AM
NO RATINGS
Intel is making fun of TSMC for limiting the process variants, but the they could stand to look in the mirror. They pretty much fill their fabs with a single product variant. I agree that very advanced products on very advanced processes will probably have to be co-developed for each other. This will cause challenges for some companies, but not most. Most foundry customers run a variety of products in smaller run rates and with more process variants. They could not ammortize the cost of doing it themselves and need a foundry model. I wouldn't be surprised to see one or two companies head back the other way or engage in a JDP model with a foundry.

Mxv
User Rank
CEO
re: Intel exec says fabless model “collapsing”
Mxv   4/25/2012 10:09:49 PM
NO RATINGS
Intel is basically telling Wall Street (thru the conference) AMD, Qualcomm and the rest of the industry can't compete because they're fabless and dependent on inferior technology so we deserve a better stock valuation. Ho humm. Haven't we heard this basically at every technology node?

MikeSantarini
User Rank
Manager
re: Intel exec says fabless model “collapsing”
MikeSantarini   4/25/2012 10:06:22 PM
NO RATINGS
Problem: "I hate it when they are so well trained by their PR departments." Reporter 101 solution: Booze Nice Piece, Amigo.

Vancouver
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel exec says fabless model “collapsing”
Vancouver   4/25/2012 9:36:57 PM
NO RATINGS
Intel Corporation is a Patriot while most other fabless are pinheads.

wilber_xbox
User Rank
Manager
re: Intel exec says fabless model “collapsing”
wilber_xbox   4/25/2012 6:35:13 PM
NO RATINGS
given the fact that not many companies can develop technologies at 2X and 1X nodes due to high monetary cost, going solo is not an option. Either collaboration or going fabless is an option. Intel is surely ahead by 2 to 3 years as far as technology is concerned.

<<   <   Page 3 / 5   >   >>


Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Analog Faceplate Design Decisions: Art or Science?
Max Maxfield
19 comments
My degree is in Control Engineering -- a core of math with "surrounding subjects" of electronics, mechanics, and hydraulics and fluidics. The only official programming I did as part of ...

Jolt Judges and Andrew Binstock

Jolt Awards: The Best Books
Jolt Judges and Andrew Binstock
1 Comment
As we do every year, Dr. Dobb's recognizes the best books of the last 12 months via the Jolt Awards -- our cycle of product awards given out every two months in each of six categories. No ...

Engineering Investigations

Air Conditioner Falls From Window, Still Works
Engineering Investigations
3 comments
It's autumn in New England. The leaves are turning to red, orange, and gold, my roses are in their second bloom, and it's time to remove the air conditioner from the window. On September ...

David Blaza

The Other Tesla
David Blaza
5 comments
I find myself going to Kickstarter and Indiegogo on a regular basis these days because they have become real innovation marketplaces. As far as I'm concerned, this is where a lot of cool ...