Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 3 / 5   >   >>
KB3001
User Rank
Author
re: Intel exec says fabless model “collapsing”
KB3001   4/28/2012 11:10:20 AM
NO RATINGS
Correct. Beyond CPU, Intel does not have much scale advantage and they should (and are) very worried indeed. This bravado from Mr Bohr et al. is not fooling us....

KB3001
User Rank
Author
re: Intel exec says fabless model “collapsing”
KB3001   4/28/2012 11:05:11 AM
NO RATINGS
Absolutely, what Mr Bohr is saying here is pure chauvisnism IMO. Instead of predicting the demise of the fabless/foundry model, he should have simply predicted much closer tie-up between fabless companies and foundries in the future e.g. through joint ventures.

selinz
User Rank
Author
re: Intel exec says fabless model “collapsing”
selinz   4/27/2012 3:58:44 PM
NO RATINGS
I'm surpised to see such grandiose claims from an Intel spokesman. They have a huge talented work force and history doesn't validate a previous commenter's claim that they don't innovate. As long as your factories are running and you've got high margin products, no need to dump capacity to others and enable your competitors.

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
re: Intel exec says fabless model “collapsing”
rick merritt   4/27/2012 5:19:03 AM
NO RATINGS
Speaking of booze, let's grab a beer sometime ;-)

andyzg
User Rank
Author
re: Intel exec says fabless model “collapsing”
andyzg   4/26/2012 8:37:30 AM
NO RATINGS
bohr's view is narrow in the sense that he assumes high quantity products. however, once the scaling ends slowly, the design matters more, and increasingly differentiated designs are used for different applications. NRE will matter a lot. bohr should be worried about having only one customer.

PV-Geek
User Rank
Author
re: Intel exec says fabless model “collapsing”
PV-Geek   4/26/2012 2:29:12 AM
NO RATINGS
Intel is making fun of TSMC for limiting the process variants, but the they could stand to look in the mirror. They pretty much fill their fabs with a single product variant. I agree that very advanced products on very advanced processes will probably have to be co-developed for each other. This will cause challenges for some companies, but not most. Most foundry customers run a variety of products in smaller run rates and with more process variants. They could not ammortize the cost of doing it themselves and need a foundry model. I wouldn't be surprised to see one or two companies head back the other way or engage in a JDP model with a foundry.

Mxv
User Rank
Author
re: Intel exec says fabless model “collapsing”
Mxv   4/25/2012 10:09:49 PM
NO RATINGS
Intel is basically telling Wall Street (thru the conference) AMD, Qualcomm and the rest of the industry can't compete because they're fabless and dependent on inferior technology so we deserve a better stock valuation. Ho humm. Haven't we heard this basically at every technology node?

MikeSantarini
User Rank
Author
re: Intel exec says fabless model “collapsing”
MikeSantarini   4/25/2012 10:06:22 PM
NO RATINGS
Problem: "I hate it when they are so well trained by their PR departments." Reporter 101 solution: Booze Nice Piece, Amigo.

Vancouver
User Rank
Author
re: Intel exec says fabless model “collapsing”
Vancouver   4/25/2012 9:36:57 PM
NO RATINGS
Intel Corporation is a Patriot while most other fabless are pinheads.

wilber_xbox
User Rank
Author
re: Intel exec says fabless model “collapsing”
wilber_xbox   4/25/2012 6:35:13 PM
NO RATINGS
given the fact that not many companies can develop technologies at 2X and 1X nodes due to high monetary cost, going solo is not an option. Either collaboration or going fabless is an option. Intel is surely ahead by 2 to 3 years as far as technology is concerned.

<<   <   Page 3 / 5   >   >>


Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST

What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.

Brought to you by:

Most Recent Comments
rick merritt
 
Saturation
 
DCH0
 
realjjj
 
traneus
 
realjjj
 
realjjj
 
Doug_S
 
spike_johan
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
Once the base layer of a design has been taped out, making ...
In this short video we show an LED light demo to ...
The LTC2380-24 is a versatile 24-bit SAR ADC that combines ...
In this short video we show an LED light demo to ...
02:46
Wireless Power enables applications where it is difficult ...
07:41
LEDs are being used in current luxury model automotive ...
With design sizes expected to increase by 5X through 2020, ...
01:48
Linear Technology’s LT8330 and LT8331, two Low Quiescent ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
05:27
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
05:18
Silego Technology’s highly versatile Mixed-signal GreenPAK ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...