Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 5   >   >>
RGRU
User Rank
Author
Foot in mouth disease
RGRU   8/20/2014 4:51:49 PM
NO RATINGS
I bet he wishes he could take this silly statement back.  The foundries and their customers appear to be THRIVING...

MClayton200
User Rank
Author
re: Intel exec says fabless model “collapsing”
MClayton200   1/23/2014 3:31:47 PM
NO RATINGS
Re: Graphene below 10nm

Yes, but not eliminating silicon, but augmenting it.

Same for GaN with Graphene.  Just my opinion.

beatnik_8983
User Rank
Author
re: Intel exec says fabless model “collapsing”
beatnik_8983   7/11/2012 5:32:57 AM
NO RATINGS
No way..graphene !! It will be silicon all the way..

resistion
User Rank
Author
re: Intel exec says fabless model “collapsing”
resistion   7/2/2012 3:25:32 PM
NO RATINGS
2y nm DRAM without EUV, let's get over it.

yalanand
User Rank
Author
re: Intel exec says fabless model “collapsing”
yalanand   5/4/2012 5:43:27 AM
NO RATINGS
@MikeSmith2011, what after 14nm,10nm I think after this we will graphene transistor era.

gatorfan
User Rank
Author
re: Intel exec says fabless model “collapsing”
gatorfan   5/2/2012 2:03:34 PM
NO RATINGS
For Bohr's comment to be credible, it needs to have a discussion of alternatives. I get the point about collaboration between design and process. But that is to imply that Qualcomm and TSMC don't collaborate similarly which would be lunacy. Qualitatively can Intel collaborate more efficiently vs Qualcomm/TSMC might be a case to make. Otherwise, what is the argument since the Semi world will not all suddenly revert to an IDM business model. It took 20 years to get where we are today. If the strategic challenges are that severe it will take another 20 years to revert. In the mean time there is a TON of demand to make the current Fabless/Foundry model "work". So, the comparison is not Intel vs Qualcomm but perhaps a near in competitor now Fabless model Intel vs AMD.

andyzg
User Rank
Author
re: Intel exec says fabless model “collapsing”
andyzg   5/1/2012 3:52:27 PM
NO RATINGS
yes, well possible. nonethless, as a technology matures, the game changes from "being able to make at all" to "being able to make it economically at increasingly lower quantities" -- to satisfy increasingly diverse markets. intel should buy xilinx, add e-beam capability to their fabs, and offer a foundry model to a broad customer base that covers the whole spectrum of quantities.

Simon7382
User Rank
Author
re: Intel exec says fabless model “collapsing”
Simon7382   5/1/2012 4:01:27 AM
NO RATINGS
That will work for analog and mixed signal stuff, but for serious digital you need to be on the leading edge (or pretty close to it) of processing to compete.

Simon7382
User Rank
Author
re: Intel exec says fabless model “collapsing”
Simon7382   5/1/2012 3:59:16 AM
NO RATINGS
Watch Intel taking significant share in the base-band business in a year or two using its process technology advantage. As far as "fooling us" I would much more put my money on Intel than Global Foundries or AMD or most others in the digital IC business (Qualcomm being the only possible exception).

Simon7382
User Rank
Author
re: Intel exec says fabless model “collapsing”
Simon7382   5/1/2012 3:54:39 AM
NO RATINGS
Well, no flag waving but I would not dot count Intel out in the low power/cell phone processor game. They are usually not the first (same as Msoft) but when they come they mow down the competition. This will be especially true if in fact TSMC will have a serious hick-up below 20nm, which may well happen.

Page 1 / 5   >   >>


Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST

What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Are the design challenges the same as with embedded systems, but with a little developer- and IT-skills added in? What do engineers need to know? Rick Merritt talks with two experts about the tools and best options for designing IoT devices in 2016. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
05:27
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
05:18
Silego Technology’s highly versatile Mixed-signal GreenPAK ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
See the Virtex® UltraScale+™ FPGA with 32.75G backplane ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...