Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 3 / 5   >   >>
KB3001
User Rank
CEO
re: Intel exec says fabless model “collapsing”
KB3001   4/28/2012 11:10:20 AM
NO RATINGS
Correct. Beyond CPU, Intel does not have much scale advantage and they should (and are) very worried indeed. This bravado from Mr Bohr et al. is not fooling us....

KB3001
User Rank
CEO
re: Intel exec says fabless model “collapsing”
KB3001   4/28/2012 11:05:11 AM
NO RATINGS
Absolutely, what Mr Bohr is saying here is pure chauvisnism IMO. Instead of predicting the demise of the fabless/foundry model, he should have simply predicted much closer tie-up between fabless companies and foundries in the future e.g. through joint ventures.

selinz
User Rank
CEO
re: Intel exec says fabless model “collapsing”
selinz   4/27/2012 3:58:44 PM
NO RATINGS
I'm surpised to see such grandiose claims from an Intel spokesman. They have a huge talented work force and history doesn't validate a previous commenter's claim that they don't innovate. As long as your factories are running and you've got high margin products, no need to dump capacity to others and enable your competitors.

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
re: Intel exec says fabless model “collapsing”
rick merritt   4/27/2012 5:19:03 AM
NO RATINGS
Speaking of booze, let's grab a beer sometime ;-)

andyzg
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel exec says fabless model “collapsing”
andyzg   4/26/2012 8:37:30 AM
NO RATINGS
bohr's view is narrow in the sense that he assumes high quantity products. however, once the scaling ends slowly, the design matters more, and increasingly differentiated designs are used for different applications. NRE will matter a lot. bohr should be worried about having only one customer.

PV-Geek
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel exec says fabless model “collapsing”
PV-Geek   4/26/2012 2:29:12 AM
NO RATINGS
Intel is making fun of TSMC for limiting the process variants, but the they could stand to look in the mirror. They pretty much fill their fabs with a single product variant. I agree that very advanced products on very advanced processes will probably have to be co-developed for each other. This will cause challenges for some companies, but not most. Most foundry customers run a variety of products in smaller run rates and with more process variants. They could not ammortize the cost of doing it themselves and need a foundry model. I wouldn't be surprised to see one or two companies head back the other way or engage in a JDP model with a foundry.

Mxv
User Rank
CEO
re: Intel exec says fabless model “collapsing”
Mxv   4/25/2012 10:09:49 PM
NO RATINGS
Intel is basically telling Wall Street (thru the conference) AMD, Qualcomm and the rest of the industry can't compete because they're fabless and dependent on inferior technology so we deserve a better stock valuation. Ho humm. Haven't we heard this basically at every technology node?

MikeSantarini
User Rank
Manager
re: Intel exec says fabless model “collapsing”
MikeSantarini   4/25/2012 10:06:22 PM
NO RATINGS
Problem: "I hate it when they are so well trained by their PR departments." Reporter 101 solution: Booze Nice Piece, Amigo.

Vancouver
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel exec says fabless model “collapsing”
Vancouver   4/25/2012 9:36:57 PM
NO RATINGS
Intel Corporation is a Patriot while most other fabless are pinheads.

wilber_xbox
User Rank
Manager
re: Intel exec says fabless model “collapsing”
wilber_xbox   4/25/2012 6:35:13 PM
NO RATINGS
given the fact that not many companies can develop technologies at 2X and 1X nodes due to high monetary cost, going solo is not an option. Either collaboration or going fabless is an option. Intel is surely ahead by 2 to 3 years as far as technology is concerned.

<<   <   Page 3 / 5   >   >>


Most Recent Comments
didymus7
 
cd2012
 
GerryWood
 
prabhakar_deosthali
 
prabhakar_deosthali
 
prabhakar_deosthali
 
stevestark002
 
David Ashton
 
R_Colin_Johnson
Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Want to Present a Paper at ESC Boston 2015?
Max Maxfield
8 comments
I tell you, I need more hours in each day. If I was having any more fun, there would have to be two of me to handle it all. For example, I just heard that I'm going to be both a speaker ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
13 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).