Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
User Rank
re: Opinion: Using GPUs to accelerate EDA applications
docdivakar   5/11/2012 6:09:10 AM
Existing (not optimally parallel) EDA tools can still exploit the operating system to benefit from parallelism. Examples abound, like the pattern-based DRC; in the TCAD area, computational lithography, etc. MP Divakar

User Rank
re: Opinion: Using GPUs to accelerate EDA applications
urital.rocketick   5/7/2012 5:31:01 AM
Hi TingLu, FPGA-based accelerators enable to run chip designs at MHz speeds and to debug system-level scenarios in the lab, but they are not simulators. It is just a different product category. Pros: - You can reach 1-10MHz speeds with them and therefore debug your driver and even your application in embedded systems Cons: - They are very expensive. - Require significant ramp-up time, and then if you change your code or libraries you are not really debugging your real silicon design - Does not work alongside your existing test-bench (verification environment), and if it does you cannot reach MHz speeds. - Limited in capacity (to scale you need to add more FPGAs/boxes but then you trade-off with speed) - Lack support for non-synthesize-able code - No support for 4-state logic - Lack full visibility - Long compilation time (require to synthesys and place-and-route)

User Rank
re: Opinion: Using GPUs to accelerate EDA applications
TingLu   5/7/2012 4:17:38 AM
Simulation acceleration has been dominant by FPGA. I am wondering how well it is compared with GPU.

User Rank
re: Opinion: Using GPUs to accelerate EDA applications
Les_Slater   5/6/2012 1:20:21 AM
The problem of rethinking algorithmic foundations is an interesting one. This needs to be taken on as a general formality of a geometry of problem space.

Karl Fergusen
User Rank
re: Opinion: Using GPUs to accelerate EDA applications
Karl Fergusen   5/3/2012 7:05:05 PM
We started using Jacket a few months ago to accelerate MatLab codes at L-3 on the GPU. Awesome speedups!


Drones are, in essence, flying autonomous vehicles. Pros and cons surrounding drones today might well foreshadow the debate over the development of self-driving cars. In the context of a strongly regulated aviation industry, "self-flying" drones pose a fresh challenge. How safe is it to fly drones in different environments? Should drones be required for visual line of sight – as are piloted airplanes? Join EE Times' Junko Yoshida as she moderates a panel of drone experts.

Brought to you by

July 16, 1pm EDT Thursday
IoT Network Shoot Out
Top Comments of the Week
Flash Poll
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Special Video Section
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...
General-purpose DACs have applications in instrumentation, ...
Linear Technology demonstrates its latest measurement ...
Demos from Maxim Integrated at Electronica 2014 show ...
Bosch CEO Stefan Finkbeiner shows off latest combo and ...
STMicroelectronics demoed this simple gesture control ...
Keysight shows you what signals lurk in real-time at 510MHz ...
TE Connectivity's clear-plastic, full-size model car shows ...
Why culture makes Linear Tech a winner.
Recently formed Architects of Modern Power consortium ...
Specially modified Corvette C7 Stingray responds to ex Indy ...