Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 2
sharps_eng
User Rank
Rookie
re: Should private equity consolidate EDA?
sharps_eng   5/4/2012 9:41:09 PM
NO RATINGS
I agree that a misaligned market expectations put a skewed stress on executives in managing their companies. What starts as a technology company becomes a licence-revenue company in a saturated market. There is still revenue, but not in the way some shareholders expect. Incidentally, I don't like the way newcomers coming into the field are bought up assimilated and neutered so they don't compete with the big established packages. This happened to Orcad and many others. I can't blame the incumbents for defending themselves but it's a bitch when you invested in the low-cost software and you see it blown out of sight for being successful enough to annoy Big EDA.

docdivakar
User Rank
CEO
re: Should private equity consolidate EDA?
docdivakar   5/4/2012 6:53:32 PM
NO RATINGS
Kris, for an EDA vendor I think the time has come to look at Silicon as a 'system' and offer design/simulation tools that help realize its implementation. If you look what Mentor has done by moving up and down the value chain, it seems to make sense. Mentor has made strategic moves to move in to mechanical/thermal analysis market, automobile harness design software, to cite a few examples. In the burgeoning MEMS market as another, other than Tanner, none of the big three unify EDA tools with MEMS design tools. Though consolidation may make sense to some extent, I don't believe it is the endgame for big EDA. There is plenty to be done in vertical markets that big EDA can leverage. MP Divakar

krisi
User Rank
CEO
re: Should private equity consolidate EDA?
krisi   5/4/2012 5:59:40 PM
NO RATINGS
Great idea in principle but how do you grow vertically @docdivakar without becoming a silicon design company? Or do you want to go back LSI Logic days? Kris

docdivakar
User Rank
CEO
re: Should private equity consolidate EDA?
docdivakar   5/4/2012 5:51:19 PM
NO RATINGS
I would like to suggest a complete departure from the premise of consolidation in EDA -I think the industry NEEDS to grow in vertical markets. Of the big three, I only see Mentor making efforts to do this with what critics may call limited success (I am not one of them! I think Mentor will do well in many of the new markets entered). If you look at the Ansys example, as an outsider to conventional EDA, it started by the acquisition of Ansoft, then Apache and now can arguably be called a vertically integrated EDA company. I do see that the big three EDA companies are starting to react mainly driven by Ansys' consolidation as well the industry trends such as 3D stacked IC's where one needs to add multidisciplinary simulation into the design flows. MP Divakar

suntan
User Rank
Rookie
re: Should private equity consolidate EDA?
suntan   5/4/2012 5:31:12 PM
NO RATINGS
The author completely missed the boat. Many facts were wrong, just to list a few: - maintaining/up keeping EDA software is hard, very hard in many cases. the cost is not 'muted' - EDA software is not that hard to displace. The problem is that users do not want to invest in this area. In most cases, EDA vendors are the ones shouldering the cost. There is only 1 problem in EDA : 3 vendors. All EDA users use this situation to maximize the agony of EDA vendors. All the problems the author talked about are the observe-able results of having 3-boxers in the ring at the same time. the only solution is to take 1 of the 3 out of the ring.

krisi
User Rank
CEO
re: Should private equity consolidate EDA?
krisi   5/4/2012 3:42:48 PM
NO RATINGS
If the switching costs are high why bother maintaining expensive sales force? That always bothered me about EDA...Kris

mcgrathdylan
User Rank
Blogger
re: Should private equity consolidate EDA?
mcgrathdylan   5/3/2012 10:20:08 PM
NO RATINGS
An intruiging proposal. What would it take to convince private equity that this is a sound idea? My guy reaction is that they might not be all that hot to jump into EDA, either.

<<   <   Page 2 / 2


Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Want to Present a Paper at ESC Boston 2015?
Max Maxfield
8 comments
I tell you, I need more hours in each day. If I was having any more fun, there would have to be two of me to handle it all. For example, I just heard that I'm going to be both a speaker ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
12 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).