Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 2
sharps_eng
User Rank
Author
re: Should private equity consolidate EDA?
sharps_eng   5/4/2012 9:41:09 PM
NO RATINGS
I agree that a misaligned market expectations put a skewed stress on executives in managing their companies. What starts as a technology company becomes a licence-revenue company in a saturated market. There is still revenue, but not in the way some shareholders expect. Incidentally, I don't like the way newcomers coming into the field are bought up assimilated and neutered so they don't compete with the big established packages. This happened to Orcad and many others. I can't blame the incumbents for defending themselves but it's a bitch when you invested in the low-cost software and you see it blown out of sight for being successful enough to annoy Big EDA.

docdivakar
User Rank
Author
re: Should private equity consolidate EDA?
docdivakar   5/4/2012 6:53:32 PM
NO RATINGS
Kris, for an EDA vendor I think the time has come to look at Silicon as a 'system' and offer design/simulation tools that help realize its implementation. If you look what Mentor has done by moving up and down the value chain, it seems to make sense. Mentor has made strategic moves to move in to mechanical/thermal analysis market, automobile harness design software, to cite a few examples. In the burgeoning MEMS market as another, other than Tanner, none of the big three unify EDA tools with MEMS design tools. Though consolidation may make sense to some extent, I don't believe it is the endgame for big EDA. There is plenty to be done in vertical markets that big EDA can leverage. MP Divakar

krisi
User Rank
Author
re: Should private equity consolidate EDA?
krisi   5/4/2012 5:59:40 PM
NO RATINGS
Great idea in principle but how do you grow vertically @docdivakar without becoming a silicon design company? Or do you want to go back LSI Logic days? Kris

docdivakar
User Rank
Author
re: Should private equity consolidate EDA?
docdivakar   5/4/2012 5:51:19 PM
NO RATINGS
I would like to suggest a complete departure from the premise of consolidation in EDA -I think the industry NEEDS to grow in vertical markets. Of the big three, I only see Mentor making efforts to do this with what critics may call limited success (I am not one of them! I think Mentor will do well in many of the new markets entered). If you look at the Ansys example, as an outsider to conventional EDA, it started by the acquisition of Ansoft, then Apache and now can arguably be called a vertically integrated EDA company. I do see that the big three EDA companies are starting to react mainly driven by Ansys' consolidation as well the industry trends such as 3D stacked IC's where one needs to add multidisciplinary simulation into the design flows. MP Divakar

suntan
User Rank
Author
re: Should private equity consolidate EDA?
suntan   5/4/2012 5:31:12 PM
NO RATINGS
The author completely missed the boat. Many facts were wrong, just to list a few: - maintaining/up keeping EDA software is hard, very hard in many cases. the cost is not 'muted' - EDA software is not that hard to displace. The problem is that users do not want to invest in this area. In most cases, EDA vendors are the ones shouldering the cost. There is only 1 problem in EDA : 3 vendors. All EDA users use this situation to maximize the agony of EDA vendors. All the problems the author talked about are the observe-able results of having 3-boxers in the ring at the same time. the only solution is to take 1 of the 3 out of the ring.

krisi
User Rank
Author
re: Should private equity consolidate EDA?
krisi   5/4/2012 3:42:48 PM
NO RATINGS
If the switching costs are high why bother maintaining expensive sales force? That always bothered me about EDA...Kris

mcgrathdylan
User Rank
Author
re: Should private equity consolidate EDA?
mcgrathdylan   5/3/2012 10:20:08 PM
NO RATINGS
An intruiging proposal. What would it take to convince private equity that this is a sound idea? My guy reaction is that they might not be all that hot to jump into EDA, either.

<<   <   Page 2 / 2


Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST

What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.

Brought to you by:

Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
In this short video we show an LED light demo to ...
The LTC2380-24 is a versatile 24-bit SAR ADC that combines ...
In this short video we show an LED light demo to ...
02:46
Wireless Power enables applications where it is difficult ...
07:41
LEDs are being used in current luxury model automotive ...
With design sizes expected to increase by 5X through 2020, ...
01:48
Linear Technology’s LT8330 and LT8331, two Low Quiescent ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
05:27
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
05:18
Silego Technology’s highly versatile Mixed-signal GreenPAK ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
See the Virtex® UltraScale+™ FPGA with 32.75G backplane ...