Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 2
sharps_eng
User Rank
Author
re: Should private equity consolidate EDA?
sharps_eng   5/4/2012 9:41:09 PM
NO RATINGS
I agree that a misaligned market expectations put a skewed stress on executives in managing their companies. What starts as a technology company becomes a licence-revenue company in a saturated market. There is still revenue, but not in the way some shareholders expect. Incidentally, I don't like the way newcomers coming into the field are bought up assimilated and neutered so they don't compete with the big established packages. This happened to Orcad and many others. I can't blame the incumbents for defending themselves but it's a bitch when you invested in the low-cost software and you see it blown out of sight for being successful enough to annoy Big EDA.

docdivakar
User Rank
Author
re: Should private equity consolidate EDA?
docdivakar   5/4/2012 6:53:32 PM
NO RATINGS
Kris, for an EDA vendor I think the time has come to look at Silicon as a 'system' and offer design/simulation tools that help realize its implementation. If you look what Mentor has done by moving up and down the value chain, it seems to make sense. Mentor has made strategic moves to move in to mechanical/thermal analysis market, automobile harness design software, to cite a few examples. In the burgeoning MEMS market as another, other than Tanner, none of the big three unify EDA tools with MEMS design tools. Though consolidation may make sense to some extent, I don't believe it is the endgame for big EDA. There is plenty to be done in vertical markets that big EDA can leverage. MP Divakar

krisi
User Rank
Author
re: Should private equity consolidate EDA?
krisi   5/4/2012 5:59:40 PM
NO RATINGS
Great idea in principle but how do you grow vertically @docdivakar without becoming a silicon design company? Or do you want to go back LSI Logic days? Kris

docdivakar
User Rank
Author
re: Should private equity consolidate EDA?
docdivakar   5/4/2012 5:51:19 PM
NO RATINGS
I would like to suggest a complete departure from the premise of consolidation in EDA -I think the industry NEEDS to grow in vertical markets. Of the big three, I only see Mentor making efforts to do this with what critics may call limited success (I am not one of them! I think Mentor will do well in many of the new markets entered). If you look at the Ansys example, as an outsider to conventional EDA, it started by the acquisition of Ansoft, then Apache and now can arguably be called a vertically integrated EDA company. I do see that the big three EDA companies are starting to react mainly driven by Ansys' consolidation as well the industry trends such as 3D stacked IC's where one needs to add multidisciplinary simulation into the design flows. MP Divakar

suntan
User Rank
Author
re: Should private equity consolidate EDA?
suntan   5/4/2012 5:31:12 PM
NO RATINGS
The author completely missed the boat. Many facts were wrong, just to list a few: - maintaining/up keeping EDA software is hard, very hard in many cases. the cost is not 'muted' - EDA software is not that hard to displace. The problem is that users do not want to invest in this area. In most cases, EDA vendors are the ones shouldering the cost. There is only 1 problem in EDA : 3 vendors. All EDA users use this situation to maximize the agony of EDA vendors. All the problems the author talked about are the observe-able results of having 3-boxers in the ring at the same time. the only solution is to take 1 of the 3 out of the ring.

krisi
User Rank
Author
re: Should private equity consolidate EDA?
krisi   5/4/2012 3:42:48 PM
NO RATINGS
If the switching costs are high why bother maintaining expensive sales force? That always bothered me about EDA...Kris

mcgrathdylan
User Rank
Author
re: Should private equity consolidate EDA?
mcgrathdylan   5/3/2012 10:20:08 PM
NO RATINGS
An intruiging proposal. What would it take to convince private equity that this is a sound idea? My guy reaction is that they might not be all that hot to jump into EDA, either.

<<   <   Page 2 / 2


Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
As data rates begin to move beyond 25 Gbps channels, new problems arise. Getting to 50 Gbps channels might not be possible with the traditional NRZ (2-level) signaling. PAM4 lets data rates double with only a small increase in channel bandwidth by sending two bits per symbol. But, it brings new measurement and analysis problems. Signal integrity sage Ransom Stephens will explain how PAM4 differs from NRZ and what to expect in design, measurement, and signal analysis.

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...
The LT®3752/LT3752-1 are current mode PWM controllers ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...