What a complete non sequitur of an article. Obama and the NY fab are completed unrelated topics except for the fact he is visiting the complex campaigning.
Why would you cover Obama's campaign in a publication that is supposed to be dedicated to EE?
I think this is news. This is what we expect to read from EETIMES because Techcrunh, Mashable will not report because it is not web or apps. I do not see anything wrong in this report. This is America and we need to take politics out of this.
No, first guy is right. Just political photoOP. Bad for EETimes coverage. Someone remind me again what great things have come out of this mythical "Valley" in NY? And what happened to that stupid "Alley" they had? IBM has been somewhere up there forever. Yes, good. But. I'm guessing there have been lots of construction jobs pouring concrete for buildings and maybe a fab or two. Where's the Hi Tech? Those AMATs, KLAs, and Tokyo Electrons will move their storefronts if there's not real long-term business. How many other cities has this happened in? This is just politicians spending our money, and now posing for the picture.
I believe both both IBM and Intel are interested in developing their spots in New York's Tech Valley. see: http://www.eetimes.com/electronics-news/4228366/Intel--IBM--others-to-pump--4-4B-into-NY-chip-R-D
The way you show that you are behind an industry is to cut corporate taxes, reduce regulations, cut the stanglehold of unions and open up work visas, not take a picture; thats just politics, thus the negative feedback on the article.
I'm afraid that politics will always play a role in our industry. We may not like the players nor their policies but we can't ignore their role. Hence the coverage. Research in semiconductor technologies and processes cannot be done in a vacuum, and must have be cooperative. For that to succeed government, industry and academia must work together, as they have always done from the industrial days to today. A debate among two presidential candidates on government industrial policies is in order.
Look, this was a photo op. This facility was built several years ago by IBM and is driven by the Semiconductor Industry's forward-thinking. Newer additions are built as technology requires.
In fact, before moving into my newer role, I did materials R&D at this facility 2002-2006. When I first entered the facility, a high-level IBM'r gave an overview of the facility. His first point of pride was that IBM largely funded this facility. Additionally, other companies could participate by providing new/developmental equipment or materials, OR they could provide financing. During my last project in '06, a newer facility was being built to accomodate EUV and newer technologies.
Politicins want votes, Corporations want freebies. Every now and then the Taxpayers luck out as it happened at Silicon Valley.
The major reason behind the growth of Silicon Valley is that enough smart / aggressive people out of Stanford etc. wanted to live there no matter what. Sematech was created in Austin TX by none other than Reagan / Bush I using Tax money under cover of taking on the Japanese who were the threat 25 years ago. But it failed to deliver because Austin may be quirky & even nice but its surrounded by Texas with its poisonous politics that keeps out the free - thinking.
NY state has probably so far coughed up 2+ billions of taxpayer dollars for GloFo but just look at their line-up, technical leaders hired from the failed Semi co.s in Austin who could not keep up with Intel!
The semiconductor industry is no place for also rans.
This photo op is in large part due to Alain E. Kaloyeros, the positive force behind CNSE and the Albany complex. He has the unique perspective of an engineering mind, the needed credentials to work with all the right people and the saviiness of a high-tech promoter. Rebuilding America starts at the top and Kaloyeros,--Senior Vice President and Chief Executive Officer at CNSE -- knows that. This profile is somewhat dated by still relevant: http://www.nytimes.com/2002/07/26/nyregion/public-lives-behind-a-research-center-a-geek-with-great-cars.html?pagewanted=all&src=pm
What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Are the design challenges the same as with embedded systems, but with a little developer- and IT-skills added in? What do engineers need to know? Rick Merritt talks with two experts about the tools and best options for designing IoT devices in 2016. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.