Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Comments
Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 4   >   >>
Patk0317
User Rank
Author
re: Handicapping the field of possible MIPS suitors
Patk0317   5/15/2012 1:24:50 PM
NO RATINGS
Rick, I see merit in your comment about Apple wanting the MIPs engineering team . My guess is that a sale could split the company with the IP going to one suitor and the engineers to another. Patrick

GREATTerry
User Rank
Author
re: Handicapping the field of possible MIPS suitors
GREATTerry   5/15/2012 2:07:47 PM
NO RATINGS
I also agree that it is highly likely a Chinese company may finally acquire MIPS.

zylxzxcyz
User Rank
Author
re: Handicapping the field of possible MIPS suitors
zylxzxcyz   5/15/2012 3:55:16 PM
NO RATINGS
Chinese company ...which one?

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
re: Handicapping the field of possible MIPS suitors
rick merritt   5/15/2012 4:14:46 PM
NO RATINGS
My current thought is the best deal for MIPS is to sell its patent portfolio while retaining rights to it as IPWireless did in a deal with Nvidia and IV this week. That gives MIPS a solid cash injection and the freedom to develop next-gen products.

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
re: Handicapping the field of possible MIPS suitors
rick merritt   5/15/2012 4:15:40 PM
NO RATINGS
I think China could create a new entity to drive the MIPS core forward, even as it did with C*Core to drive the Moto M*Core

moronda
User Rank
Author
re: Handicapping the field of possible MIPS suitors
moronda   5/15/2012 4:36:08 PM
NO RATINGS
Take a look at MIPS financials. That says it all. During an era with explosive growth in smartphones and tablets, MIPS revenue has been flat. ARM revenue grew more in one year than the complete size of MIPS. 2011 2010 2009 MIPS 82M 71M 70M ARM 764M 636M 492M I'd say the war has been lost along with the battle. It is a complete domination. Also, what good are MIPS patents really? Have the MIPS patents in any way prevented ARM from being successful? No. What I like to talk about is CEO FAIL. These CEOs never get held accountable for total failure. Sandeep, what were you thinking when you joined MIPS? Was it just your overriding desire to obtain the ultimate title of CEO? Maybe if it gets bought though, it isn't a fail. It gets to be spun as a success. I took over MIPS and led it to a successful acquisition. I hope nobody buys it. Why buy it? Just flush it down the toilet where it belongs. Not every company deserves to be or should be bought.

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Author
re: Handicapping the field of possible MIPS suitors
junko.yoshida   5/15/2012 7:39:54 PM
NO RATINGS
Hi, Moronda. ARM may have won the war, as you say, but I wouldn't discount MIPS patents so quickly. I wouldn't discount Sandeep so quickly either. Much of the difficulties MIPS had gone through are due to what happened even before Sandeep arrived at MIPS. Lastly, I wouldn't want any company to go down the toilet. Every company, and every engineer on the team, deserves to do its/his best and eventually succeed.

ThursonFarlongIII
User Rank
Author
re: Handicapping the field of possible MIPS suitors
ThursonFarlongIII   5/15/2012 8:04:14 PM
NO RATINGS
Microchip could be interested. MIPS could add another revenue stream, and they are expanding rapidly. They also sell some nicely integrated Mips based micros.

DMcCunney
User Rank
Author
re: Handicapping the field of possible MIPS suitors
DMcCunney   5/15/2012 8:23:13 PM
NO RATINGS
The converse question to "Who might buy MIPS?" is "Why should MIPS want to sell?" I think the answer is probably obvious. Size matters, and MIPS feels it needs to be part of a bigger, better heeled company to survive and compete long-term in the CPU/GPU market. And it isn't clear that ARM has won the war. The current war I see is all about power efficiency, and ARM is poised to make inroads into the server market because ARM cores use less power than Intel. It's even more vital in the mobile device market, where the scarce resource is battery charge, and you win by being able to work longer without needing to recharge. I think a lot will hinge on just how good the newly announced MIPS designs are. If they are as power efficient as claimed, they'll get a lot of interest. And while I don't expect it would happen, I know a company that might find MIPS a worthwhile acquisition: Intel. Intel has little penetration in the mobile device market, and the Atom processor hasn't really been able to compete with ARM. Intel might find it worthwhile to add MIPS both for the patent portfolio and the opportunity to better compete with ARM in the mobile market. They can certainly afford the price. Intel used to license ARM IP, and had its own line of StrongARM processors, before selling it to Freescale in a reorganization. If they bought MIPS, they wouldn't be licensing someone else's technology. It would be theirs, because they bought it. And Intel has the fabs and the process technology to manufacture MIPS based chips in any form desired. I don't expect it to occur for corporate ego reasons - it would be an implicit admission Intel has been unable to compete with X86 based designs in the mobile space, and had to acquire different technology they didn't create to do so. But it might make sense for them to do so.

tb1
User Rank
Author
re: Handicapping the field of possible MIPS suitors
tb1   5/15/2012 10:12:31 PM
NO RATINGS
"I'd say the war has been lost along with the battle. " Hah! Do you work for ARM? Motorola once dominated cell phones. MySpace once dominated social networks. The war is -never- over.

Page 1 / 4   >   >>


Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST
In conjunction with unveiling of EE Times’ Silicon 60 list, journalist & Silicon 60 researcher Peter Clarke hosts a conversation on startups in the electronics industry. One of Silicon Valley's great contributions to the world has been the demonstration of how the application of entrepreneurship and venture capital to electronics and semiconductor hardware can create wealth with developments in semiconductors, displays, design automation, MEMS and across the breadth of hardware developments. But in recent years concerns have been raised that traditional venture capital has turned its back on hardware-related startups in favor of software and Internet applications and services. Panelists from incubators join Peter Clarke in debate.
Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Special Video Section
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...
The LT®3752/LT3752-1 are current mode PWM controllers ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...
General-purpose DACs have applications in instrumentation, ...
Linear Technology demonstrates its latest measurement ...
10:29
Demos from Maxim Integrated at Electronica 2014 show ...
Bosch CEO Stefan Finkbeiner shows off latest combo and ...
STMicroelectronics demoed this simple gesture control ...
Keysight shows you what signals lurk in real-time at 510MHz ...
TE Connectivity's clear-plastic, full-size model car shows ...
Why culture makes Linear Tech a winner.