Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
embedsri
User Rank
Rookie
re: NASA, SpaceX lower expectations for historic flight to space station
embedsri   5/22/2012 2:35:04 PM
NO RATINGS
Congratulations SpaceX

george.leopold
User Rank
Rookie
re: NASA, SpaceX lower expectations for historic flight to space station
george.leopold   5/22/2012 2:09:24 PM
NO RATINGS
SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft reached orbit early Tuesday (May 22) morning, achieving the first goal of a critical test flight to the International Space Station. SpaceX and the commercial space era now enter a new phase as the Dragon spacecraft and its controllers seek to navigate to the space station in preparation for the first-ever docking of a commercial spacecraft with the orbiting lab. So far, so good.

george.leopold
User Rank
Rookie
re: NASA, SpaceX lower expectations for historic flight to space station
george.leopold   5/21/2012 7:32:13 PM
NO RATINGS
The Merlin main engines on the Falcon 9 rocket are a version of a NASA-developed engine from the 1980s called Fastrac. SpaceX also needs a better second stage engine, and rockets experts favor the J-2X engine, an improved version of the Saturn V second stage engine. What SpaceX and other commercial companies relying on rockets for launches need to focus on next is the "specific impulse" of their engines and lowering the cost per pound to orbit to $1K, iniitally, and some day in the far off future, $100 per pound. For how SpaceX is pulling this off, I highly recommend: http://www.airspacemag.com/space-exploration/Visionary-Launchers-Employees.html

microe
User Rank
Rookie
re: NASA, SpaceX lower expectations for historic flight to space station
microe   5/21/2012 5:30:51 PM
NO RATINGS
It is a amazing that a small private company can do such sophisticated space launch that few countries in the world can accomplish. Wonder how much they paid NASA to get these technologies, and how they can do it at lower cost than NASA.

george.leopold
User Rank
Rookie
re: NASA, SpaceX lower expectations for historic flight to space station
george.leopold   5/21/2012 12:35:28 PM
NO RATINGS
SpaceX said it will try again on Tuesday (May 22) a.m. after replacing a faulty valve in a center main engine (nine main engines are arranged in a tic-tac-toe configuration). A sensor had picked overpressure in the engine's combustion chamber. Stay tuned.

embedsri
User Rank
Rookie
re: NASA, SpaceX lower expectations for historic flight to space station
embedsri   5/21/2012 5:11:48 AM
NO RATINGS
Better luck next week.

sharps_eng
User Rank
Rookie
re: NASA, SpaceX lower expectations for historic flight to space station
sharps_eng   5/19/2012 6:17:22 PM
NO RATINGS
That in itself must have been pretty dramatic, practically everything running at full blast - getting an orderly shutdown from that point is just as hazardous as everything else up to that point - can't just lean back and say 'Whew!', everything has to be depressurised, cooled down or warmed up, emptied and made safe... exciting stuff...plenty for the flight engineers to get intense about

KB3001
User Rank
CEO
re: NASA, SpaceX lower expectations for historic flight to space station
KB3001   5/19/2012 2:20:31 PM
NO RATINGS
Hopefully it's just a blip. Better luck next week!

george.leopold
User Rank
Rookie
re: NASA, SpaceX lower expectations for historic flight to space station
george.leopold   5/19/2012 1:30:03 PM
NO RATINGS
Saturday's launch attempt was aborted at T-minus 0.5 seconds when sensors reportedly detected overpressure in the Falcon 9's engine(s). Earliest possible retry is Tuesday (May 22).



Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Book Review: Deadly Odds by Allen Wyler
Max Maxfield
11 comments
Generally speaking, when it comes to settling down with a good book, I tend to gravitate towards science fiction and science fantasy. Having said this, I do spend a lot of time reading ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
13 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).