Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
DickH1
User Rank
Author
re: Memristor is 200 years old, say academics
DickH1   5/26/2012 2:15:39 PM
NO RATINGS
memristor behaviour is NOT non-linear - it's time-dependent. That can look non-linear, but when Chua went looking for the 'fourth device' he knew he was looking for a device in which the resistance depends on the time-integral of the current through it (in effect the resistance is directly and linearly proportional to the total charge that has been transferred over the device's history. That is the essence of the device that Chua defined

Blaise
User Rank
Author
re: Memristor is 200 years old, say academics
Blaise   5/24/2012 1:49:04 PM
NO RATINGS
What Chua and others are calling "memristor" behavior is representative of a wide variety of dynamic systems and does not necessarily have anything to with the memristor as originally defined in 1971 or as redefined by Chua in 2011. What Chua and HP are doing with the "memristor" has a lot more to do with enhancing their reputation than proper science or ReRAM research. I refer you to a presentation I gave at ISCAS 2010 and a paper I wrote responding to Stan Williams of HP for more details. http://vixra.org/pdf/1205.0041v1.pdf http://vixra.org/pdf/1205.0004v1.pdf

Peter Clarke
User Rank
Author
re: Memristor is 200 years old, say academics
Peter Clarke   5/24/2012 7:28:20 AM
NO RATINGS
Quite right. Slip of the typing, finger now corrected.

przemek0
User Rank
Author
re: Memristor is 200 years old, say academics
przemek0   5/23/2012 7:09:04 PM
NO RATINGS
Why is this so controversial? Memristor behavior is nonlinear, and it's no surprise that first measurements showed all kinds of nonlinearities. Electric arcs are inherently non-linear, and if they can show and justify a memory-driven behavior, their thesis would make a lot of sense. At this point I am not convinced, but I simply do not see shenanigans that the others seem to imply.

jdesbonnet
User Rank
Author
re: Memristor is 200 years old, say academics
jdesbonnet   5/23/2012 6:28:15 PM
NO RATINGS
The text currently reads "It adds that observation of memristor behavior just happens to be older than the first formal discussions of the resistor (Ohm in 1827) and the inductor (Faraday in 1931)." 1831 for Faraday surely.

selinz
User Rank
Author
re: Memristor is 200 years old, say academics
selinz   5/23/2012 5:44:30 PM
NO RATINGS
regardless of who said what first, I do find the entire subject rather interesting. The little youtube video by the fellow at HP is quite entertaining.

Blaise
User Rank
Author
re: Memristor is 200 years old, say academics
Blaise   5/23/2012 2:08:23 PM
NO RATINGS
The funniest part of the article is the conclusion: "We end this historical narrative by noting that even though the memristor has seen its light of joy only recently in 2008, and has been recognized as the fourth circuit element along with the resistor, capacitor and inductor, it actually predates the resistor, which was formally published by Ohm in 1827, and the inductor, which was formally published by Faraday in 1831." For those who do not see how delusional and revisionist this statement is you are missing a really good joke. For a more objective insight into the history of Ohm's Law I would recommend the following text: Schiffer, Michael (2008). Power Struggles: Scientific Authority and the Creation of Practical Electricity Before Edison. MIT Press Chua seems to me more a figure like Peter Barlow, a mathematician who, prior to Ohm, proposed a law describing the conduction of wires based on pure reasoning rather than experiment. Barlow was eventually discredited by experiments.

resistion
User Rank
Author
re: Memristor is 200 years old, say academics
resistion   5/23/2012 11:18:05 AM
NO RATINGS
I always felt HP was the one guilty of overselling its memristor, but Chua fell into the temptation of generalizing to all resistance memories. I think at most a special subset would fit being memristors.



Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST

What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Are the design challenges the same as with embedded systems, but with a little developer- and IT-skills added in? What do engineers need to know? Rick Merritt talks with two experts about the tools and best options for designing IoT devices in 2016. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
05:27
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
05:18
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
See the Virtex® UltraScale+™ FPGA with 32.75G backplane ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...