Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
DickH
User Rank
Author
re: Memristor is 200 years old, say academics
DickH   5/26/2012 2:15:39 PM
NO RATINGS
memristor behaviour is NOT non-linear - it's time-dependent. That can look non-linear, but when Chua went looking for the 'fourth device' he knew he was looking for a device in which the resistance depends on the time-integral of the current through it (in effect the resistance is directly and linearly proportional to the total charge that has been transferred over the device's history. That is the essence of the device that Chua defined

Blaise
User Rank
Author
re: Memristor is 200 years old, say academics
Blaise   5/24/2012 1:49:04 PM
NO RATINGS
What Chua and others are calling "memristor" behavior is representative of a wide variety of dynamic systems and does not necessarily have anything to with the memristor as originally defined in 1971 or as redefined by Chua in 2011. What Chua and HP are doing with the "memristor" has a lot more to do with enhancing their reputation than proper science or ReRAM research. I refer you to a presentation I gave at ISCAS 2010 and a paper I wrote responding to Stan Williams of HP for more details. http://vixra.org/pdf/1205.0041v1.pdf http://vixra.org/pdf/1205.0004v1.pdf

Peter Clarke
User Rank
Author
re: Memristor is 200 years old, say academics
Peter Clarke   5/24/2012 7:28:20 AM
NO RATINGS
Quite right. Slip of the typing, finger now corrected.

przemek0
User Rank
Author
re: Memristor is 200 years old, say academics
przemek0   5/23/2012 7:09:04 PM
NO RATINGS
Why is this so controversial? Memristor behavior is nonlinear, and it's no surprise that first measurements showed all kinds of nonlinearities. Electric arcs are inherently non-linear, and if they can show and justify a memory-driven behavior, their thesis would make a lot of sense. At this point I am not convinced, but I simply do not see shenanigans that the others seem to imply.

jdesbonnet
User Rank
Author
re: Memristor is 200 years old, say academics
jdesbonnet   5/23/2012 6:28:15 PM
NO RATINGS
The text currently reads "It adds that observation of memristor behavior just happens to be older than the first formal discussions of the resistor (Ohm in 1827) and the inductor (Faraday in 1931)." 1831 for Faraday surely.

selinz
User Rank
Author
re: Memristor is 200 years old, say academics
selinz   5/23/2012 5:44:30 PM
NO RATINGS
regardless of who said what first, I do find the entire subject rather interesting. The little youtube video by the fellow at HP is quite entertaining.

Blaise
User Rank
Author
re: Memristor is 200 years old, say academics
Blaise   5/23/2012 2:08:23 PM
NO RATINGS
The funniest part of the article is the conclusion: "We end this historical narrative by noting that even though the memristor has seen its light of joy only recently in 2008, and has been recognized as the fourth circuit element along with the resistor, capacitor and inductor, it actually predates the resistor, which was formally published by Ohm in 1827, and the inductor, which was formally published by Faraday in 1831." For those who do not see how delusional and revisionist this statement is you are missing a really good joke. For a more objective insight into the history of Ohm's Law I would recommend the following text: Schiffer, Michael (2008). Power Struggles: Scientific Authority and the Creation of Practical Electricity Before Edison. MIT Press Chua seems to me more a figure like Peter Barlow, a mathematician who, prior to Ohm, proposed a law describing the conduction of wires based on pure reasoning rather than experiment. Barlow was eventually discredited by experiments.

resistion
User Rank
Author
re: Memristor is 200 years old, say academics
resistion   5/23/2012 11:18:05 AM
NO RATINGS
I always felt HP was the one guilty of overselling its memristor, but Chua fell into the temptation of generalizing to all resistance memories. I think at most a special subset would fit being memristors.



Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST
IoT Network Shoot Out
July 16, 1pm EDT Thursday

Replay available now: A handful of emerging network technologies are competing to be the preferred wide-area connection for the Internet of Things. All claim lower costs and power use than cellular but none have wide deployment yet. Listen in as proponents of leading contenders make their case to be the metro or national IoT network of the future. Rick Merritt, EE Times Silicon Valley Bureau Chief, moderators this discussion. Join in and ask his guests questions.

Brought to you by

Most Recent Comments
Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Special Video Section
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...
The LT®3752/LT3752-1 are current mode PWM controllers ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...
General-purpose DACs have applications in instrumentation, ...
Linear Technology demonstrates its latest measurement ...
10:29
Demos from Maxim Integrated at Electronica 2014 show ...
Bosch CEO Stefan Finkbeiner shows off latest combo and ...
STMicroelectronics demoed this simple gesture control ...
Keysight shows you what signals lurk in real-time at 510MHz ...
TE Connectivity's clear-plastic, full-size model car shows ...
Why culture makes Linear Tech a winner.