Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 6 / 8   >   >>
gmsamaras_eet
User Rank
Rookie
re: Scientist vs Engineer
gmsamaras_eet   6/5/2012 2:45:05 AM
NO RATINGS
Being both a scientist and an engineer, I'd say that is as good an explanation as I've seen. I might want to modify that to "naturally-occurring stuff", but I think we all get the general idea. GM Samaras Pueblo, CO

KB3001
User Rank
CEO
re: Scientist vs Engineer
KB3001   6/4/2012 10:29:05 PM
NO RATINGS
One of my teachers used to say: Science is the study of God-made stuff, whereas Engineering is the study of man-mande stuff.

Bert22306
User Rank
CEO
re: Scientist vs Engineer
Bert22306   6/4/2012 8:40:16 PM
NO RATINGS
Good posts! I guess the spectrum is continuous, so in the real world, the differences are often not sharply defined. In principle, a scientist makes discoveries that may or may not lead to anything tangible. Where an engineer applies the knowledge. But then take someone like Claude Shannon. How would you classify him? Among other inventions and discoveries, he derived what we call Shannon's Equation (relationship between channel capacity, noise, and bandwidth), which some might say is a scientist's or a mathematician's "job," but he studied EE at U Michigan and MIT. He did a lot of theoretical work in cryptography. All for real, practical purposes, but theoretical work nevertheless.

ndancer
User Rank
Rookie
re: Scientist vs Engineer
ndancer   6/4/2012 7:52:36 PM
NO RATINGS
If man could fly, it would be the job of the scientist to explain how. Since he can't, it's the job of the engineer to make it possible.

DU00000001
User Rank
CEO
re: Scientist vs Engineer
DU00000001   6/4/2012 6:55:28 PM
NO RATINGS
To stick to this picture: scientists equal the rabbi, engineers the believer.

DarkMatter0
User Rank
Rookie
re: Scientist vs Engineer
DarkMatter0   6/4/2012 6:23:30 PM
NO RATINGS
A scientist discovers. An engineer invents.

Tloose
User Rank
Rookie
re: Scientist vs Engineer
Tloose   6/4/2012 12:09:57 PM
NO RATINGS
A Scientist asks why something works; an Engineer has to figure out why something doesn't work.

Rod Dalitz
User Rank
Rookie
re: Scientist vs Engineer
Rod Dalitz   6/3/2012 8:49:31 PM
NO RATINGS
I will take this one step further: I believe that one can consider the technician, engineer, and scientist as a spectrum. The scientist discovers new principles, and the best scientists are extremely valuable to society in the long term, for example, the discovery of electricity and semiconductors are essential to modern life. A good scientist may create enormous value but has little day-to-day responsibility. The engineer makes use of scientific principles and empirical knowledge to devise new solutions to problems and to create new products, and is valuable in a medium term. He has considerable responsibility and targets to meet, within timescales longer than day-to-day. The technician produces and operates these new products, and is equally valuable in the short term, designing the detailed product and running the factory efficiently. He has In some cases, the value of the technician is recognised - a GP or Dentist mostly carries out standard procedures, which is a technician's task, and is well paid for it. Someone running a semiconductor fab is doing a high-level technician task, which I would not wish to give to an engineer and even less to a scientist. The scientist may make 1000% changes, that is order of magnitude; engineers may make 100% changes; the technician may make 10% changes, which may be the difference between success ad failure of the rfinery or semi fab.

resistion
User Rank
CEO
re: Scientist vs Engineer
resistion   6/2/2012 1:50:36 PM
NO RATINGS
I hardly see "scientist" in a job title, except for maybe "chief scientist" or "lead scientist". But almost any technical job title includes "engineer".

Itinerant Engineer
User Rank
Rookie
re: Scientist vs Engineer
Itinerant Engineer   6/2/2012 1:19:40 AM
NO RATINGS
Scientists study parts of the universe, creating mathematical models describing what can and cannot be done. Engineers take the scientists' models (often from multiple disciplines) and find a way to achieve the same end as if the impossible were possible. Consider meta-materials that behave as if they had a negative index of refraction. Negative indices of refraction are impossible, but the combination of resonant units at sufficiently small scales behave as if they did, for a given frequency range, without violating that principle. Lance ==)--------------

<<   <   Page 6 / 8   >   >>


Most Recent Comments
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Oh, No! My Antique Analog Meter Has Twitched Its Last
Max Maxfield
6 comments
Well, life is certainly full of ups and downs, isn't it? When it comes to the antique analog meters I'm using in a number of my hobby projects, things appeared to be going swimmingly well, ...

EDN Staff

11 Summer Vacation Spots for Engineers
EDN Staff
20 comments
This collection of places from technology history, museums, and modern marvels is a roadmap for an engineering adventure that will take you around the world. Here are just a few spots ...

Glen Chenier

Engineers Solve Analog/Digital Problem, Invent Creative Expletives
Glen Chenier
15 comments
- An analog engineer and a digital engineer join forces, use their respective skills, and pull a few bunnies out of a hat to troubleshoot a system with which they are completely ...

Larry Desjardin

Engineers Should Study Finance: 5 Reasons Why
Larry Desjardin
46 comments
I'm a big proponent of engineers learning financial basics. Why? Because engineers are making decisions all the time, in multiple ways. Having a good financial understanding guides these ...

Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)