Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 18 / 18
loptide
User Rank
Author
re: Four reasons why its 'game over' for foreign chip firms in China
loptide   6/6/2012 4:03:56 PM
NO RATINGS
You know there's great general quality control such as when large volumes of milk is spiked with melamine (2008 and on-going). Oh, I forgot, but I don't make phone calls with milk. Never mind.

linyj
User Rank
Author
re: Four reasons why its 'game over' for foreign chip firms in China
linyj   6/6/2012 2:56:50 PM
NO RATINGS
The key question to answer is why RDA can enjoy 20% OPBT with 35%gross margin? If it's partly from "to be local" with supply chain, then I'd say there is some true competition margin.

SR656601
User Rank
Author
re: Four reasons why its 'game over' for foreign chip firms in China
SR656601   6/6/2012 2:48:04 PM
NO RATINGS
Tai is right on the money and Junko is right. I've worked during the past 5 odd years in China, competing with the likes of RDA and I can tell you first hand I couldn't have picked more major reasons as Vincent articulated here. Let me share a few personal perspectives. Whenever I returned from my long stay in China to my bay area office it was like a day and night and I was entering into a strangely out-of-touch world here in bay area. Not generalizing, but I've seen this attitude of "China phone quality is bad, they can't sustain," from so many people in semi companies here in the bay area, that I confess feeling if I am siding with the losing team. Look, it's a hard lesson to hear when you are out here in the valley but hear me on this. We crow about the cheap quality of Chinese-made phones, but how many of us really think that it is really bad? How many actually used them? Have you used them in China Mobile network? The U.S. mobile service companies and phone companies have trained all of us into paying them exorbitant amounts of money for products and services and for that what do we get? Crappy service with dropped calls, and try switching phones from one network to another. In China, it is very common for the consumer to switch phones as often as they wish and China Mobile service is the best cell service ever I've experienced in all the world. How about that for better consumer experience? I guarantee you, you take one of these high quality iPhone/Android phones with a reasonable, 300Yuan phone from China and compare the consumer experience in AT&T network, you would be hard pressed to find many differences. Bells and whistles yes but basic functionality? No difference. So when we talk about China phone quality, we need to take into account the entire consumer experience and then evaluate. As a logical consequence, when we talk about China competitiveness, we need to look at how they service the markets and why they win. SR

Mushroom in the dark
User Rank
Author
re: Four reasons why its 'game over' for foreign chip firms in China
Mushroom in the dark   6/6/2012 2:33:06 PM
NO RATINGS
Can't understand it. As the title says "'game over' for foreign chip firms in China". I was expecting a reaction of how it was wrong that almost all the western semi con companies had put all their eggs in the same basket. Does the term "monopoly" ring a bell? Honestly, are we not concerned that technology will someday be beholden to one country that can dictate its release depending on their interest and own internal policies?

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Author
re: Four reasons why its 'game over' for foreign chip firms in China
junko.yoshida   6/6/2012 2:15:47 PM
NO RATINGS
Judging from the comments posted here, I realize that a lot of people are still stuck in the last decade -- when we all believed that China's products equal poor quality. That may have been the case in the past, but I think it's time to rethink that. Not all products made in China are buggy. There were times when anything made in Japan was synonymous to cheap products in poor quality.

yalanand
User Rank
Author
re: Four reasons why its 'game over' for foreign chip firms in China
yalanand   6/6/2012 10:55:58 AM
NO RATINGS
@rick.merritt, what exactly you mean by the two will have to meet in the middle? Do you think the two will eventually tie-up to face the market challenges ?

yalanand
User Rank
Author
re: Four reasons why its 'game over' for foreign chip firms in China
yalanand   6/6/2012 10:46:44 AM
NO RATINGS
People don't prefer buying chinese goods because they aren't sure about the quality of those goods. China creates low-cost product but by compromising quality.

sunny565
User Rank
Author
re: Four reasons why its 'game over' for foreign chip firms in China
sunny565   6/6/2012 7:14:55 AM
NO RATINGS
This interview clearly shows how they care about the quality of their products. I'm just not sure if that's how you should build a successful company anywhere!!!

PoseTech
User Rank
Author
re: Four reasons why its 'game over' for foreign chip firms in China
PoseTech   6/6/2012 6:26:03 AM
NO RATINGS
Of course they can pump out a new phone every 3 months with 5 to 10 people but the question is do you want to use it knowing that it is going to breakdown when you most want to use it? They don't care if the product is buggy or unstable becaues it is going to be replaced in three months. In addition, a lot of the design work are cut and copy which will of course cut down on the design cycle.

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
re: Four reasons why its 'game over' for foreign chip firms in China
rick merritt   6/6/2012 6:06:32 AM
NO RATINGS
Long term I don't think China can build a sustainable chip industry on its ability accept lower margins and work harder. Similarly, I don't think Western chip makers can sustain their higher margins and easier paces. IMHO the two will have to meet in the middle in a future global industry.

<<   <   Page 18 / 18


Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST
In conjunction with unveiling of EE Times’ Silicon 60 list, journalist & Silicon 60 researcher Peter Clarke hosts a conversation on startups in the electronics industry. One of Silicon Valley's great contributions to the world has been the demonstration of how the application of entrepreneurship and venture capital to electronics and semiconductor hardware can create wealth with developments in semiconductors, displays, design automation, MEMS and across the breadth of hardware developments. But in recent years concerns have been raised that traditional venture capital has turned its back on hardware-related startups in favor of software and Internet applications and services. Panelists from incubators join Peter Clarke in debate.
Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Special Video Section
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...
The LT®3752/LT3752-1 are current mode PWM controllers ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...
General-purpose DACs have applications in instrumentation, ...
Linear Technology demonstrates its latest measurement ...
10:29
Demos from Maxim Integrated at Electronica 2014 show ...
Bosch CEO Stefan Finkbeiner shows off latest combo and ...
STMicroelectronics demoed this simple gesture control ...
Keysight shows you what signals lurk in real-time at 510MHz ...
TE Connectivity's clear-plastic, full-size model car shows ...
Why culture makes Linear Tech a winner.