Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 5 / 18   >   >>
resistion
User Rank
CEO
re: Four reasons why its 'game over' for foreign chip firms in China
resistion   6/12/2012 3:27:08 PM
NO RATINGS
The US may attract but not necessarily retain.

resistion
User Rank
CEO
re: Four reasons why its 'game over' for foreign chip firms in China
resistion   6/12/2012 3:22:06 PM
NO RATINGS
Nothing requiring clearance at universities. Defense firms on the other hand...

tideblue
User Rank
Rookie
re: Four reasons why its 'game over' for foreign chip firms in China
tideblue   6/12/2012 11:31:42 AM
NO RATINGS
OK ok,let's say all you said is true. Then I am begging our great world-peace-keeper uncle Sam to deliver great democracy to this evil country. Then what?why do not they take China like Iraq. It is 100 times more evil

tideblue
User Rank
Rookie
re: Four reasons why its 'game over' for foreign chip firms in China
tideblue   6/12/2012 11:20:58 AM
NO RATINGS
Looks like you really know china history.But you are very wrong. Even during the cultural revolution, chinese GDP doubled in that 10 years. (please do some googling). Many of your so called facts are wrong.I do want to comments on all of them. So please, if you try to understand china, do it like a real engineer. Do not use those second-hand biased facts.Be careful with the media, since most of them are trying to brainwash you guys.

resistion
User Rank
CEO
re: Four reasons why its 'game over' for foreign chip firms in China
resistion   6/12/2012 4:15:33 AM
NO RATINGS
Key concern seems to be do markets outside China matter? Hopefully they do, otherwise the frustration sensed here can only rise..

Paul911
User Rank
Rookie
re: Four reasons why its 'game over' for foreign chip firms in China
Paul911   6/12/2012 12:48:55 AM
NO RATINGS
good point from private1234567890...

private1234567890
User Rank
Rookie
re: Four reasons why its 'game over' for foreign chip firms in China
private1234567890   6/11/2012 6:44:30 PM
NO RATINGS
Country B --------- The country's trade policy has literally been the most protectionist in the world for the last few decades, with an average industrial tariff rate at 40-55%. The majority of the population cannot vote, and vote-buying and electoral fraud are widespread. Corruption is rampant, with the political parties selling government jobs to their financial bankers. The country has never recruited a single civil servant through an open,competitive process. Its public finances are precarious, with records of government loan defaults that worry foreign investors. Especially in the banking sector, foreigners are prohibited from becoming directos while foreign shareholders cannot even exercise their voting rights unless they are resident in the country. It does not have a competition law, permitting cartels and other forms of monopoly to grow unchecked. Its protection of intellectual property rights is patchy, particularly marred by its refusal to protect foreigner's copyrights. Country A is China today. Country B is the USA, around 1880, when it was somewhat poorer than today's China. http://tinyurl.com/23-things-they-dont-tell-you

private1234567890
User Rank
Rookie
re: Four reasons why its 'game over' for foreign chip firms in China
private1234567890   6/11/2012 6:44:25 PM
NO RATINGS
Two basket cases... http://tinyurl.com/23-things-they-dont-tell-you Both these countries below are up to their necks in heavy protectionism, discrimination against foreign investors, weak protection of property rights, monopolies, lack of democracy, corruption, lack of meritocracy, and so on. You would think that they are both headed for developmental disasters. But think again. Country A --------- Until a decade ago, the country was highly protectionist, with an average industrial tariff rate well above 30%. Despite the recent tariff reduction, important visible and invisible trade restrictions remain. The country has heavy restrictions on cross-border flows of capital, a state-owned and highly regulated banking sector, and numerous restrictions on foreign ownership of financial assets. Foreign firms producing in the country complain that they are discriminated against through differential taxes and regulations by local governments. The country has no elections and is riddled with corruption. It has opaque and complicated property rights. In particular, its protection of intellectual property rights is weak, making it the pirate capital of the world. The country has a large number of state-owned enterprises, many of which make large losses but are propped up by subsidies and government-granted monopoly rights.

Chao.Shen
User Rank
Rookie
re: Four reasons why its 'game over' for foreign chip firms in China
Chao.Shen   6/11/2012 5:40:34 PM
NO RATINGS
Well said. If you can't stop it, stand up and compete with it.

moloned
User Rank
Rookie
re: Four reasons why its 'game over' for foreign chip firms in China
moloned   6/11/2012 4:30:11 PM
NO RATINGS
Wrong. Services will eventually follow the money back to China. Governments should be working on levelling the playing field by legislation and taxation , something they have signally failed to do. Look at the raspberry pi debacle where even though the AP was designed by Broadcom in the UK, tax rules meant that the raspi boards were cheaper to build in China. Stoopid is as stoopid does!

<<   <   Page 5 / 18   >   >>


Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Curiosity Killed the Cat (Just Call Me Mr. Curiosity)
Max Maxfield
23 comments
My wife, Gina The Gorgeous, loves animals. She has two stupid dogs and two stupid cats. How stupid are they? Well, allow me to show you this video of the dogs that I made a couple of years ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
13 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).