Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 5 / 18   >   >>
resistion
User Rank
CEO
re: Four reasons why its 'game over' for foreign chip firms in China
resistion   6/12/2012 3:27:08 PM
NO RATINGS
The US may attract but not necessarily retain.

resistion
User Rank
CEO
re: Four reasons why its 'game over' for foreign chip firms in China
resistion   6/12/2012 3:22:06 PM
NO RATINGS
Nothing requiring clearance at universities. Defense firms on the other hand...

tideblue
User Rank
Rookie
re: Four reasons why its 'game over' for foreign chip firms in China
tideblue   6/12/2012 11:31:42 AM
NO RATINGS
OK ok,let's say all you said is true. Then I am begging our great world-peace-keeper uncle Sam to deliver great democracy to this evil country. Then what?why do not they take China like Iraq. It is 100 times more evil

tideblue
User Rank
Rookie
re: Four reasons why its 'game over' for foreign chip firms in China
tideblue   6/12/2012 11:20:58 AM
NO RATINGS
Looks like you really know china history.But you are very wrong. Even during the cultural revolution, chinese GDP doubled in that 10 years. (please do some googling). Many of your so called facts are wrong.I do want to comments on all of them. So please, if you try to understand china, do it like a real engineer. Do not use those second-hand biased facts.Be careful with the media, since most of them are trying to brainwash you guys.

resistion
User Rank
CEO
re: Four reasons why its 'game over' for foreign chip firms in China
resistion   6/12/2012 4:15:33 AM
NO RATINGS
Key concern seems to be do markets outside China matter? Hopefully they do, otherwise the frustration sensed here can only rise..

Paul911
User Rank
Rookie
re: Four reasons why its 'game over' for foreign chip firms in China
Paul911   6/12/2012 12:48:55 AM
NO RATINGS
good point from private1234567890...

private1234567890
User Rank
Rookie
re: Four reasons why its 'game over' for foreign chip firms in China
private1234567890   6/11/2012 6:44:30 PM
NO RATINGS
Country B --------- The country's trade policy has literally been the most protectionist in the world for the last few decades, with an average industrial tariff rate at 40-55%. The majority of the population cannot vote, and vote-buying and electoral fraud are widespread. Corruption is rampant, with the political parties selling government jobs to their financial bankers. The country has never recruited a single civil servant through an open,competitive process. Its public finances are precarious, with records of government loan defaults that worry foreign investors. Especially in the banking sector, foreigners are prohibited from becoming directos while foreign shareholders cannot even exercise their voting rights unless they are resident in the country. It does not have a competition law, permitting cartels and other forms of monopoly to grow unchecked. Its protection of intellectual property rights is patchy, particularly marred by its refusal to protect foreigner's copyrights. Country A is China today. Country B is the USA, around 1880, when it was somewhat poorer than today's China. http://tinyurl.com/23-things-they-dont-tell-you

private1234567890
User Rank
Rookie
re: Four reasons why its 'game over' for foreign chip firms in China
private1234567890   6/11/2012 6:44:25 PM
NO RATINGS
Two basket cases... http://tinyurl.com/23-things-they-dont-tell-you Both these countries below are up to their necks in heavy protectionism, discrimination against foreign investors, weak protection of property rights, monopolies, lack of democracy, corruption, lack of meritocracy, and so on. You would think that they are both headed for developmental disasters. But think again. Country A --------- Until a decade ago, the country was highly protectionist, with an average industrial tariff rate well above 30%. Despite the recent tariff reduction, important visible and invisible trade restrictions remain. The country has heavy restrictions on cross-border flows of capital, a state-owned and highly regulated banking sector, and numerous restrictions on foreign ownership of financial assets. Foreign firms producing in the country complain that they are discriminated against through differential taxes and regulations by local governments. The country has no elections and is riddled with corruption. It has opaque and complicated property rights. In particular, its protection of intellectual property rights is weak, making it the pirate capital of the world. The country has a large number of state-owned enterprises, many of which make large losses but are propped up by subsidies and government-granted monopoly rights.

Chao.Shen
User Rank
Rookie
re: Four reasons why its 'game over' for foreign chip firms in China
Chao.Shen   6/11/2012 5:40:34 PM
NO RATINGS
Well said. If you can't stop it, stand up and compete with it.

moloned
User Rank
Rookie
re: Four reasons why its 'game over' for foreign chip firms in China
moloned   6/11/2012 4:30:11 PM
NO RATINGS
Wrong. Services will eventually follow the money back to China. Governments should be working on levelling the playing field by legislation and taxation , something they have signally failed to do. Look at the raspberry pi debacle where even though the AP was designed by Broadcom in the UK, tax rules meant that the raspi boards were cheaper to build in China. Stoopid is as stoopid does!

<<   <   Page 5 / 18   >   >>


Top Comments of the Week
Flash Poll
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Recommended Reads From the Engineer's Bookshelf
Max Maxfield
2 comments
I'm not sure if I read more than most folks or not, but I do I know that I spend quite a lot of time reading. I hate to be idle, so I always have a book or two somewhere about my person -- ...

Aubrey Kagan

Have You Ever Been Blindsided by Your Own Design?
Aubrey Kagan
37 comments
I recently read GCHQ: The uncensored story of Britain's most sensitive intelligence agency by Richard J. Aldrich. The Government Communication Headquarters (GCHQ), Britain's equivalent of ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
2 comments
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
15 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Special Video Section
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...
General-purpose DACs have applications in instrumentation, ...
Linear Technology demonstrates its latest measurement ...
10:29
Demos from Maxim Integrated at Electronica 2014 show ...
Bosch CEO Stefan Finkbeiner shows off latest combo and ...
STMicroelectronics demoed this simple gesture control ...
Keysight shows you what signals lurk in real-time at 510MHz ...
TE Connectivity's clear-plastic, full-size model car shows ...
Why culture makes Linear Tech a winner.
Recently formed Architects of Modern Power consortium ...
Specially modified Corvette C7 Stingray responds to ex Indy ...
Avago’s ACPL-K30T is the first solid-state driver qualified ...
NXP launches its line of multi-gate, multifunction, ...
Doug Bailey, VP of marketing at Power Integrations, gives a ...
See how to ease software bring-up with DesignWare IP ...
DesignWare IP Prototyping Kits enable fast software ...
This video explores the LT3086, a new member of our LDO+ ...
In today’s modern electronic systems, the need for power ...