Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 5 / 18   >   >>
resistion
User Rank
Author
re: Four reasons why its 'game over' for foreign chip firms in China
resistion   6/12/2012 3:27:08 PM
NO RATINGS
The US may attract but not necessarily retain.

resistion
User Rank
Author
re: Four reasons why its 'game over' for foreign chip firms in China
resistion   6/12/2012 3:22:06 PM
NO RATINGS
Nothing requiring clearance at universities. Defense firms on the other hand...

tideblue
User Rank
Author
re: Four reasons why its 'game over' for foreign chip firms in China
tideblue   6/12/2012 11:31:42 AM
NO RATINGS
OK ok,let's say all you said is true. Then I am begging our great world-peace-keeper uncle Sam to deliver great democracy to this evil country. Then what?why do not they take China like Iraq. It is 100 times more evil

tideblue
User Rank
Author
re: Four reasons why its 'game over' for foreign chip firms in China
tideblue   6/12/2012 11:20:58 AM
NO RATINGS
Looks like you really know china history.But you are very wrong. Even during the cultural revolution, chinese GDP doubled in that 10 years. (please do some googling). Many of your so called facts are wrong.I do want to comments on all of them. So please, if you try to understand china, do it like a real engineer. Do not use those second-hand biased facts.Be careful with the media, since most of them are trying to brainwash you guys.

resistion
User Rank
Author
re: Four reasons why its 'game over' for foreign chip firms in China
resistion   6/12/2012 4:15:33 AM
NO RATINGS
Key concern seems to be do markets outside China matter? Hopefully they do, otherwise the frustration sensed here can only rise..

Paul911
User Rank
Author
re: Four reasons why its 'game over' for foreign chip firms in China
Paul911   6/12/2012 12:48:55 AM
NO RATINGS
good point from private1234567890...

private1234567890
User Rank
Author
re: Four reasons why its 'game over' for foreign chip firms in China
private1234567890   6/11/2012 6:44:30 PM
NO RATINGS
Country B --------- The country's trade policy has literally been the most protectionist in the world for the last few decades, with an average industrial tariff rate at 40-55%. The majority of the population cannot vote, and vote-buying and electoral fraud are widespread. Corruption is rampant, with the political parties selling government jobs to their financial bankers. The country has never recruited a single civil servant through an open,competitive process. Its public finances are precarious, with records of government loan defaults that worry foreign investors. Especially in the banking sector, foreigners are prohibited from becoming directos while foreign shareholders cannot even exercise their voting rights unless they are resident in the country. It does not have a competition law, permitting cartels and other forms of monopoly to grow unchecked. Its protection of intellectual property rights is patchy, particularly marred by its refusal to protect foreigner's copyrights. Country A is China today. Country B is the USA, around 1880, when it was somewhat poorer than today's China. http://tinyurl.com/23-things-they-dont-tell-you

private1234567890
User Rank
Author
re: Four reasons why its 'game over' for foreign chip firms in China
private1234567890   6/11/2012 6:44:25 PM
NO RATINGS
Two basket cases... http://tinyurl.com/23-things-they-dont-tell-you Both these countries below are up to their necks in heavy protectionism, discrimination against foreign investors, weak protection of property rights, monopolies, lack of democracy, corruption, lack of meritocracy, and so on. You would think that they are both headed for developmental disasters. But think again. Country A --------- Until a decade ago, the country was highly protectionist, with an average industrial tariff rate well above 30%. Despite the recent tariff reduction, important visible and invisible trade restrictions remain. The country has heavy restrictions on cross-border flows of capital, a state-owned and highly regulated banking sector, and numerous restrictions on foreign ownership of financial assets. Foreign firms producing in the country complain that they are discriminated against through differential taxes and regulations by local governments. The country has no elections and is riddled with corruption. It has opaque and complicated property rights. In particular, its protection of intellectual property rights is weak, making it the pirate capital of the world. The country has a large number of state-owned enterprises, many of which make large losses but are propped up by subsidies and government-granted monopoly rights.

Chao.Shen
User Rank
Author
re: Four reasons why its 'game over' for foreign chip firms in China
Chao.Shen   6/11/2012 5:40:34 PM
NO RATINGS
Well said. If you can't stop it, stand up and compete with it.

moloned
User Rank
Author
re: Four reasons why its 'game over' for foreign chip firms in China
moloned   6/11/2012 4:30:11 PM
NO RATINGS
Wrong. Services will eventually follow the money back to China. Governments should be working on levelling the playing field by legislation and taxation , something they have signally failed to do. Look at the raspberry pi debacle where even though the AP was designed by Broadcom in the UK, tax rules meant that the raspi boards were cheaper to build in China. Stoopid is as stoopid does!

<<   <   Page 5 / 18   >   >>


Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST
In conjunction with unveiling of EE Times’ Silicon 60 list, journalist & Silicon 60 researcher Peter Clarke hosts a conversation on startups in the electronics industry. One of Silicon Valley's great contributions to the world has been the demonstration of how the application of entrepreneurship and venture capital to electronics and semiconductor hardware can create wealth with developments in semiconductors, displays, design automation, MEMS and across the breadth of hardware developments. But in recent years concerns have been raised that traditional venture capital has turned its back on hardware-related startups in favor of software and Internet applications and services. Panelists from incubators join Peter Clarke in debate.
Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Special Video Section
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...
The LT®3752/LT3752-1 are current mode PWM controllers ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...
General-purpose DACs have applications in instrumentation, ...
Linear Technology demonstrates its latest measurement ...
10:29
Demos from Maxim Integrated at Electronica 2014 show ...
Bosch CEO Stefan Finkbeiner shows off latest combo and ...
STMicroelectronics demoed this simple gesture control ...
Keysight shows you what signals lurk in real-time at 510MHz ...
TE Connectivity's clear-plastic, full-size model car shows ...
Why culture makes Linear Tech a winner.