Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
dick_freebird
User Rank
Rookie
re: Solar cell emission 23,000x worse than C02
dick_freebird   12/5/2012 9:52:04 PM
NO RATINGS
You always see these "contains" or "uses" canards thrown out by people whose agenda it suits, but no quantitative emissions numbers, and of course the process gasses could be recaptured in situ if the manufacturer cared to. I've worked with flash X-ray machines which are just "lightning in a bottle" with the bottle full of SF6. But the bottle stays corked and losses are nil. Process gasses have to flow, but you don't see a whole lot of HF, silane, borane being vented (at least, not in the US, not these last few decades - but in the old days the industry sure did stank up some groundwater, dirty little non-secret). The feedstocks can flow to reclaim. But that is insufficiently scary to be useful in promoting whatever the "heck" these people are after. It's absurd, by the way, to call an inorganic compound "virulent".

chrisnfolsom
User Rank
Manager
re: Solar cell emission 23,000x worse than C02
chrisnfolsom   12/5/2012 1:32:48 AM
NO RATINGS
When working for an electronics manufacturer in the late 90's when we moved manufacturing to Mexico the first thing we did was remove the extended condensation hoods for our cleaning tanks using the US certified CFC solvents to use the solvents still legal in Mexico - that was progress in the wrong direction. I wonder what the laws are in China and other countries we manufacture in.

chrisnfolsom
User Rank
Manager
re: Solar cell emission 23,000x worse than C02
chrisnfolsom   12/4/2012 9:57:05 PM
NO RATINGS
The bird issues were with old technology - the larger, higher, slower rotating towers are safe for birds. Building with lots of windows are deadly though..

I_B_GREEN
User Rank
Rookie
re: Solar cell emission 23,000x worse than C02
I_B_GREEN   6/18/2012 6:42:07 PM
NO RATINGS
stop all imports from countries that cananot prove they containment is above 99.9%

I_B_GREEN
User Rank
Rookie
re: Solar cell emission 23,000x worse than C02
I_B_GREEN   6/18/2012 6:40:08 PM
NO RATINGS
I had mentioned this fact about over a year ago here in these discussion forums. When these plants were in the US IC or solar, we had good gov oversite of the release-containment-re-use of these chemicals. Or we had just gotten to a point we could. Then it all shiftede to the wild, wild east Where the rush to build and produce took over the need to not polute. The chinese will have created more greenouse gas emmissions in producing PV than all the Co2 reductions will ever have a chance to undo.

qaseemali
User Rank
Rookie
re: Solar cell emission 23,000x worse than C02
qaseemali   6/15/2012 5:53:40 AM
NO RATINGS
Solar Thermal is also a very good candidate for warm areas like the middle east and/or deserts elsewhere. Some remarkable work is being done in Spain regarding this technology. It certainly is more steady than PV and Greener too.

RDentonSr
User Rank
Rookie
re: Solar cell emission 23,000x worse than C02
RDentonSr   6/14/2012 4:55:47 PM
NO RATINGS
So does this mean "wind" is the optimum "green" source of electric power? It only kills birds, not people.

CMathas
User Rank
Blogger
re: Solar cell emission 23,000x worse than C02
CMathas   6/14/2012 2:17:48 PM
NO RATINGS
It sure would be good to know. Anyone out there? For me, it's one thing to wait--well, not 27 years--but to think that the cells are actually doing more harm boggles the mind.

Douglas.Butler
User Rank
Rookie
re: Solar cell emission 23,000x worse than C02
Douglas.Butler   6/14/2012 1:55:38 PM
NO RATINGS
I remember reading many years ago, when solar cells were much less efficient, that a cell would have to be used in average sunlight for 27 years to generate the energy that was consumed in making it in the first place. I presume that number has gotten much better since. But it would be nice to know what it currently is.

Mtocher
User Rank
Rookie
re: Solar cell emission 23,000x worse than C02
Mtocher   6/6/2012 7:20:38 PM
NO RATINGS
Here is a good reference for those seeking more knowledge on the subject: http://journalogy.net/Publication/5025870/environmental-impacts-of-crystalline-silicon-photovoltaic-module-production



Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Energizing the Young Engineers of Tomorrow
Max Maxfield
14 comments
It doesn't seem all that long ago when I was a bright-eyed, bushy-tailed young engineer. Now I feel like an old fool, but where are we going to find one at this time of the day (LOL)?

Jolt Judges and Andrew Binstock

Jolt Awards: The Best Books
Jolt Judges and Andrew Binstock
1 Comment
As we do every year, Dr. Dobb's recognizes the best books of the last 12 months via the Jolt Awards -- our cycle of product awards given out every two months in each of six categories. No ...

Engineering Investigations

Air Conditioner Falls From Window, Still Works
Engineering Investigations
2 comments
It's autumn in New England. The leaves are turning to red, orange, and gold, my roses are in their second bloom, and it's time to remove the air conditioner from the window. On September ...

David Blaza

The Other Tesla
David Blaza
5 comments
I find myself going to Kickstarter and Indiegogo on a regular basis these days because they have become real innovation marketplaces. As far as I'm concerned, this is where a lot of cool ...