Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 3 / 4   >   >>
WKetel
User Rank
Rookie
re: Europe asks if it is time for an Airbus of chips
WKetel   6/20/2012 8:12:44 PM
NO RATINGS
An airbus of chips? Late for delivery, plagued by subcontractor problems, not always tested adequately, and delayed by parts shortages, in addition to being single sourced? I suppose that if the larger substrate could be made much larger, that there may possibly be some benefit if the yield wound up being adequate. But the cost of a bad substrate would be MUCH larger, it appears.

KB3001
User Rank
CEO
re: Europe asks if it is time for an Airbus of chips
KB3001   6/20/2012 2:07:22 PM
NO RATINGS
"But if the likes of ST and Infineon, with their public shareholders, don't want to be conglomerated, what's to be done? " That is why I said Eurocrats should "facilitate" not necessarily drive European chip integration. The lever to do this is a mixture of carrots and sticks e.g. direct financial incentives for integrated efforts e.g. in new technology nodes, and financial disincentives for direct competition in certain segments e.g. DRAM.

Peter Clarke
User Rank
Blogger
re: Europe asks if it is time for an Airbus of chips
Peter Clarke   6/20/2012 11:06:26 AM
NO RATINGS
@Bert22306 @iniewski I agree with both of you -- in part. I agree Europe can't afford to get out of the chip business. I am not sure it makes PERFECT sense. And I agree you can waste a lot of taxpayers' money trying to beat the tidal forces of the free-market system. Airbus was a success so why not try something. And collaborative R&D at Crolles without full corporate integration worked -- for a while -- before company interest in semiconductor manufacture slipped down the agenda and diverged. But if the likes of ST and Infineon, with their public shareholders, don't want to be conglomerated, what's to be done?

KB3001
User Rank
CEO
re: Europe asks if it is time for an Airbus of chips
KB3001   6/20/2012 8:33:41 AM
NO RATINGS
Both Sokda and Seat are wholly owned subsidiaries of the Volkswagen Group. The VW group also owns Bentley in Britain, Bugatti in France, and Scania in Sweden. It is truly a Pan-European company now with mixture of mid-range and high-end offering. Re. your second paragraph, I do not see the point you are trying to make about finished products vs. unfinished ones. Yes, European car firms outsource "some" steps/parts of the value chain but a lot of it is done in Europe. Anyway, analogies do not have to be perfect to be useful :-) Europe cannot afford to skip chip fabrication, and if the US is managing to compete with the Far East, Europe certainly can. The pertinent point is economies of scale. The US is great at capitalising on it, Europe has not always done so because its edifice is still work in progress. The time has come to accelerate European economic integration in my opinion.

Bert22306
User Rank
CEO
re: Europe asks if it is time for an Airbus of chips
Bert22306   6/20/2012 12:02:47 AM
NO RATINGS
Sorry, but Skoda and Seat build cars under license. It's not an Airbus-like conglom. Seat used to build Fiat copies, just like Lada did in Russia. Then they went to VW some years ago. I don't have the figures, but I'll bet a lot of money that Seat lost a big chunk of their market share to the Japanese manufacturers. I'm not disputing the generalities about management and labor cost retraints. I'm simply saying, they are not always enough. Chips are not finished end products that consumers focus on. A better comparison might be, who builds the generators, the window mechanisms, or the transmissions, the OEM tires, for these cars? Do some of those components not get outsourced? (They do.)

KB3001
User Rank
CEO
re: Europe asks if it is time for an Airbus of chips
KB3001   6/19/2012 10:33:40 PM
NO RATINGS
Bert22306, the world's second largest vehicle manufacturer is the Volkswagen Group, which owns Skoda and Seat among other Pan-European brands, with production sites all over Europe and the world. This answers your point about German car firms not being trans-Euro conglom. Moreover, cars such as Skoda and Seat can hardly be described as high-end cars with premium prices. I reiterate what I said above, Germany proved that it is possible to compete with the Far East with a combination of labour reforms (e.g. wage restraints), strategic and stable management (e.g. employee co-determination), diversification of risk (e.g. pan-European acquisitions and worldwide manufacturing), and constant improvements/innovation (e.g. international R&D centres). The exact same principles could equally apply to the semiconductor industry.

Bert22306
User Rank
CEO
re: Europe asks if it is time for an Airbus of chips
Bert22306   6/19/2012 8:24:05 PM
NO RATINGS
I don't know if we can use arguments from both sides of the fense. German cars are finished products. And they are not built by a trans-Euro conglom. So the comparison is tenuous at best. German cars sell because they can demand a premium price. It's an image thing, much like Gucci handbags are for women. Careful engineering, priced quite high compared with the competition, will sell. On the other hand, chip manufacturing MAY have become commoditized. Companies won't use high priced chips in their products just because it adds a certain cachet. It doesn't. Chips have to compete on price and performance only. So I'm not buying that all this needs is government action. Government action can also spend a lot of taxpayers' money without much success.

krisi
User Rank
CEO
re: Europe asks if it is time for an Airbus of chips
krisi   6/19/2012 12:56:37 PM
NO RATINGS
This move makes perfect sense, Europe can't afford to get out of the chip business! Kris

Peter Clarke
User Rank
Blogger
re: Europe asks if it is time for an Airbus of chips
Peter Clarke   6/19/2012 11:29:46 AM
NO RATINGS
@KB3001 The other take on this and one I am hearing from the Eurocrats is the penalty for NOT driving consolidation. If Europe falls out of chip manufacturing (and manufacturing more generally) it will have reduced opportunities to take part in the coming nanotechnology wave. This wave is likely to be more significant than microelectronics. We have the academic and innovative capacity to take part, but we seem to lack the will to invest in the manufacturing part, which is where much of the value is likely to be contained and paid for. A final thought: the lesson is not lost in Europe that the one country that has maintained an emphasis on innovation AND manufacturing is leading the continent economically and is the country that all other service-oriented European countries must go to for a bail out.

KB3001
User Rank
CEO
re: Europe asks if it is time for an Airbus of chips
KB3001   6/19/2012 8:01:16 AM
NO RATINGS
I am not sure this is true. Germany proved that it is possible to compete and win in the car industry through a mixture of labour reforms, strategic and stable management, diversification of risk, and constant improvements/innovation. I believe the same principles could be applied to the semiconductor industry despite ferocious competition from the far east. Europe has to use its economies of scale to ensure a large market for its indigenous industries.

<<   <   Page 3 / 4   >   >>


EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Creating New Faceplates for Antique Analog Meters
Max Maxfield
40 comments
I've currently got a couple of hobby projects on the go that feature the use of antique analog meters. For example, there's my Inamorata Prognostication Engine and its companion, the ...

EDN Staff

11 Summer Vacation Spots for Engineers
EDN Staff
11 comments
This collection of places from technology history, museums, and modern marvels is a roadmap for an engineering adventure that will take you around the world. Here are just a few spots ...

Glen Chenier

Engineers Solve Analog/Digital Problem, Invent Creative Expletives
Glen Chenier
11 comments
- An analog engineer and a digital engineer join forces, use their respective skills, and pull a few bunnies out of a hat to troubleshoot a system with which they are completely ...

Larry Desjardin

Engineers Should Study Finance: 5 Reasons Why
Larry Desjardin
45 comments
I'm a big proponent of engineers learning financial basics. Why? Because engineers are making decisions all the time, in multiple ways. Having a good financial understanding guides these ...

Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)