Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
sharps_eng
User Rank
Rookie
re: Keep the focus on requirements
sharps_eng   6/23/2012 7:07:30 PM
NO RATINGS
In mature markets, the only way to go is the 'Plus One' route, adding something extra to the standard product to differentiate it. Like cars, the world of PC peripherals has been so long-lasting, become so over-mature, that every possible combination of keyboard-and-x has been tried, retried, and then recycled again in each of the USB and wireless throughout the myriad inscrutable peripheral manufacturers, who are also doing the same thing with lawnmowers, coffee-cup warmers and Xmas toys. Like throwing dice, this is statistical manufacturing, there doesn't have to be a need for it, just design it and throw out there - someone will buy it, and if not, move on. The intelligence behind such massive, wasteful, indiscriminate shotgun-marketing is of a different order to what we are used to in small-scale business-to-business technical product design and sales.

ChipBuilder
User Rank
Rookie
re: Keep the focus on requirements
ChipBuilder   6/23/2012 2:41:33 PM
NO RATINGS
I think it should go farther than that, you should plan the requirements of all of the products in each of your product lines. Then you look for software, hardware and inventory efficiencies and how they map against your market, resources and growth goals. Then plan to adjust rapidly, cause the plan never holds because the market and competitors mess up your plans. But at least, you know why you decided to make a decision and the impact of changing the decision.

elctrnx_lyf
User Rank
Manager
re: Keep the focus on requirements
elctrnx_lyf   6/23/2012 6:02:11 AM
NO RATINGS
Kirstin, I agree with couple of points here. Clear requirements at the beginning of the design makes your destination clear and the way also. Doing this way you can manage all the risks associated in a right manner without unnecessary delays.

Etmax
User Rank
Rookie
re: Keep the focus on requirements
Etmax   6/21/2012 11:16:15 AM
NO RATINGS
:-) I was just pulling your chain, I actually agree with everything you said. I would probably never buy a keyboard with a clock. I even didn't upgrade my monitor when I bought a new PC because I didn't want a glossy screen which was all the rave then but oh so disfunctional. I subscribe to small is good. I once did work for a medical company where the MD was also technical director and we were designing a game changing device. It still hasn't seen the light of day because they burnt all their money adding features.

old account Frank Eory
User Rank
Rookie
re: Keep the focus on requirements
old account Frank Eory   6/20/2012 11:51:15 PM
NO RATINGS
"And, really, do you think a keyboard needs a clock?" For me personally, no. But if I'm designing a new keyboard and my high volume OEM customer requires it to have a clock, then absolutely yes, it requires a clock!

Parasoft_Mitchell
User Rank
Rookie
re: Keep the focus on requirements
Parasoft_Mitchell   6/20/2012 11:17:06 PM
NO RATINGS
As Kristin said, standards like IEC 62304, ISO 26262, and IEC 61508 are driving safety-critical organizations to focus on requirements traceability in the context of a comprehensive risk management process. A recent report by VDC Research makes a couple interesting points that are notable here: 1) Organizations following such standards are less prone to cost & schedule overruns as well as faults and failures. 2) Consumer-facing verticals are poised to adopt processes similar to those used in safety-critical markets. Although device failure in these sectors does not present the same risk of tort liabilities that would be associated with loss of life, the potential financial impact of a product recall or missed market window can be just as debilitating. Sorry for the self-promotion, but you can access this paper through Parasoft, the company I work for, at http://alm.parasoft.com/embedded-software-vdc-report/

Kristin Lewotsky
User Rank
Blogger
re: Keep the focus on requirements
Kristin Lewotsky   6/20/2012 5:24:52 PM
NO RATINGS
Purely as a calculated trade-off to get a keyboard with the touch and Bluetooth connectivity I wanted, I assure you. It's more a low-grade annoyance than a dealbreaker —mostly I was using it to bring up the requirements issue, which I do think is important. Developing requirements up front with an eye toward risk management and identifying problem areas is key. It's not enough to build the list, though – you have to also manage change carefully. There have been multiple studies showing that for embedded software, alone, requirements changes cause a majority of cost and schedule overruns, not to mention leading to faults and failures. Vendors like LDRA, Visure, and PTC have made requirements traceability and management into big business. With the release of standards like IEC 62304 (for medical) and ISO 26262 (for automotive), you're starting to see more and more companies paying attention to the issue. How have you handled requirements on the projects you've been involved with? Do you develop an official document or is it something off-the-cuff in PowerPoint slide deck, based on customer input? Or is it a spreadsheet you throw together at the end before delivery? And, really, do you think a keyboard needs a clock?

Etmax
User Rank
Rookie
re: Keep the focus on requirements
Etmax   6/20/2012 10:27:23 AM
NO RATINGS
I certainly don't like feature creep in a project, doing requirements up front is the real way to go, but that could still end up with something as silly as this keyboard and mouse, but then again, maybe they're onto something, i.e. maybe they actually had this in the requirements, after all you bought this instead of one without the display? :-)

old account Frank Eory
User Rank
Rookie
re: Keep the focus on requirements
old account Frank Eory   6/19/2012 10:25:19 PM
NO RATINGS
Even seemingly simple, commoditized products like keyboards and mice offer a lot of differentiation. For every user who hates the deep dip where the thumb rests, there is another user who simply has to have that feature. Some hate the scroll wheel, others can't live without it. I wouldn't assume that what you are calling feature creep was truly a case of losing track of the requirements. Quite likely there was market research and cost vs. revenue analysis that supported the decision to make the thumb depression a requirement on that mouse or to make the small LCD screen a requirement on that keyboard. Nobody carelessly adds costs to a commodity product that has such a low retail price and such low margins. They add those costs -- and those features -- because they believe they can gain market share or a few extra gross margin points. Fortunately there is so much variety and feature differentiation that just about everyone's preferences are accommodated by some manufacturer. Clearly in this case you bought the wrong keyboard and wrong mouse for your tastes.

Kristin Lewotsky
User Rank
Blogger
re: Keep the focus on requirements
Kristin Lewotsky   6/19/2012 9:32:01 PM
NO RATINGS
If you mapped all products as a Venn diagram against time, you would see all of the circles swelling to envelop every other circle, and it doesn't matter which industry you're talking about. Everybody wants to move up the value-added foodchain. The problem is that all too often, trying to do everything means doing nothing well. Yes, this is me being a curmudgeon. Excuse me, I have to go back to trying to program my function keys to do something useful instead of their default.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Want to Present a Paper at ESC Boston 2015?
Max Maxfield
8 comments
I tell you, I need more hours in each day. If I was having any more fun, there would have to be two of me to handle it all. For example, I just heard that I'm going to be both a speaker ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
12 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).