Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
goafrit
User Rank
Manager
re: Intel to pay $375M for 1,700 InterDigital patents
goafrit   6/19/2012 12:49:46 AM
NO RATINGS
-Intel, the world's No. 1 semiconductor vendor by sales, said it will pay $375 million for the portfolio, which the companies in a statement said is "related to 3G, LTE and 802.11 technologies." Why is Intel spending this much for a technology that is largely common? I do not think this is a good investment from Intel

Simon7382
User Rank
Manager
re: Intel to pay $375M for 1,700 InterDigital patents
Simon7382   6/20/2012 9:47:49 PM
NO RATINGS
Patents on "common", i.e. widely used, technologies are the most valuable ones from a litigation perspective (whether they plan to play offense or defense). Intel seems to know what it is doing here. I am considering increasing my existing investment in Intel stock.

unknown multiplier
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel to pay $375M for 1,700 InterDigital patents
unknown multiplier   6/21/2012 1:15:36 AM
NO RATINGS
But this technology has probably already been licensed for at least five years now.

eewiz
User Rank
CEO
re: Intel to pay $375M for 1,700 InterDigital patents
eewiz   6/21/2012 4:00:12 AM
NO RATINGS
yup. Interdigital has been going after almost all wireless/mobile/chip companies to get them to license. And most of them did. That further reduces the value of these patents

docdivakar
User Rank
CEO
re: Intel to pay $375M for 1,700 InterDigital patents
docdivakar   6/25/2012 7:56:20 PM
NO RATINGS
@goafrit: I am also a bit surprised by this. It could be that Intel may be designing wireless Silicon that can use the IP acquired from IDC. MP Divakar

_hm
User Rank
CEO
re: Intel to pay $375M for 1,700 InterDigital patents
_hm   6/19/2012 1:27:44 AM
NO RATINGS
How long this patent will be relevant? Innovation and research are always in motion. This may not provide Intel with much value.

resistion
User Rank
CEO
re: Intel to pay $375M for 1,700 InterDigital patents
resistion   6/19/2012 5:05:41 AM
NO RATINGS
This is a really low valuation. Less than a quarter million per patent? Not even licensing, but complete purchase.

resistion
User Rank
CEO
re: Intel to pay $375M for 1,700 InterDigital patents
resistion   6/21/2012 1:02:25 AM
NO RATINGS
A valuation I had typically expected: http://www.moosedog.fi/2011/07/nortel-portfolio-sold-average-price-350k-per-patent/

unknown multiplier
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel to pay $375M for 1,700 InterDigital patents
unknown multiplier   6/21/2012 1:17:18 AM
NO RATINGS
Low valuation could be from it being not so "hot" technology. That may also be why InterDigital was ok to part with it rather easily.

Robotics Developer
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel to pay $375M for 1,700 InterDigital patents
Robotics Developer   6/20/2012 2:02:55 AM
NO RATINGS
It makes me wonder if there is more to the purchase than is being reported. I have to agree that 3G is not the latest to the party technology and question if Intel really needed that or if they really bought it as part of a bundled larger portfolio purchase.

eewiz
User Rank
CEO
re: Intel to pay $375M for 1,700 InterDigital patents
eewiz   6/20/2012 5:54:31 AM
NO RATINGS
Intel buying patents from patent troll!! Are they planning to troll others with these patents? If not they could simply get a license much cheaper than 375 mil.

double-o-nothing
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel to pay $375M for 1,700 InterDigital patents
double-o-nothing   6/21/2012 12:54:07 AM
NO RATINGS
USPTO search shows 1446 patents assigned to interdigital and 2282 applications (including those already granted). Assuming most of the 1700 are patents, it seems interdigital would have very little to offer after this purchase. I suppose when a company is offering its patents for sale instead of licensing, it means its own self-valuation of those patents is already quite low, or else it is in a hurry to raise cash.

docdivakar
User Rank
CEO
re: Intel to pay $375M for 1,700 InterDigital patents
docdivakar   6/25/2012 1:13:16 AM
NO RATINGS
It is a tough call to demarcate IDC as whether it is a non-practicing entity (NPE) or a practicing the art as many products companies do. NPE is solely for the purpose of licensing and NOT for practicing the art. NPE's motivation comes from litigating the IP! NPEs are NOT for transferring the technology! I hope the proceeds from the sale of the IP will let IDC become a practicing entity! MP Divakar



Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

The 10 Commandments of Electronics
Max Maxfield
6 comments
My chum Rick Curl dropped into my office this morning. We had both decided that we desperately needed some face-to-face time to talk about the current Doctor Who (our feelings are mixed at ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
13 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).