Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
TFCSD
User Rank
Author
re: Do industrial robots contribute to unemployment?
TFCSD   7/16/2012 5:58:21 AM
NO RATINGS
With employers, everything they do contributes to unemployment, so why not robots?

Tiger Joe
User Rank
Author
re: Do industrial robots contribute to unemployment?
Tiger Joe   7/3/2012 10:37:23 PM
NO RATINGS
Part of the marketability of a machine is the public's acceptance of replacing a human to do what one deems to be a repetative task. I would not want, for a second, a machine to work on my mouth. Machines working on things is one thing, machines working on humans is another.

Bob Snyder
User Rank
Author
re: Do industrial robots contribute to unemployment?
Bob Snyder   6/27/2012 4:11:29 PM
NO RATINGS
"repetitive mindless jobs" I worked in a factory for a year before attending college. I got to know a lot of the people who worked there. Many of them took pride in their work and found it satisfying. Just because a task is repetitive, that doesn't mean it is mindless. How many cavities has your dentist filled in the past week? Perhaps someday we will have robots that replace dental hygienists. A robot that is smart enough to remove plaque from the teeth is just one step away from filling cavities. And if that happens, I am sure that people will begin to refer to dentistry as a "repetitive mindless job". Whenever a machine can do a person's job better/cheaper/faster, that person's job is in jeopardy. Personally, I would love to have a home appliance that would clean my teeth every day as well as my dental hygienist does once every six months. If such a machine is ever invented and commercially successful, then my hygienist will probably lose her "repetitive mindless job". I just don't think this is anything new. When I was a kid in the 1970's, the newspaper Help Wanted section had many listings for typesetters. The phone companies employed lots of switchboard operators. Those jobs went away a long time ago. In the early 1900's, the US coal mining industry employed about 640K people. Today we are mining twice as much coal with 80K people. That's a 16x improvement in productivity, but it's also a loss of over 500K jobs. There is no doubt that technology made those workers redundant. But nobody would advocate returning to 1920's mining technology. Engineers are constantly finding ways to to automate the "mindless repetitive" parts of our jobs. But every time that happens, it means that fewer people can accomplish the same amount of work.

punkfeetpete
User Rank
Author
re: Do industrial robots contribute to unemployment?
punkfeetpete   6/22/2012 3:53:49 PM
NO RATINGS
Technology like a hammer can be used to build or for nasty things. Creation of the cotton-jinn was a robot eliminating cotton seeds that was previously done by slaves. This allowed more slave to be used to pick cotton. It took this society a civil war and enough people with leisure-time to create a (robot) cotton picker to finally eliminate most cotton-pickers. Automated on-line learning today helps people (if they want) to design manual labor-saving devices that helps free people chained to production lines and the pitiful unions that feel they need to protect these repetitive mindless jobs.

CMathas
User Rank
Author
re: Do industrial robots contribute to unemployment?
CMathas   6/21/2012 5:55:22 PM
NO RATINGS
Yes, in any event, you're right.

DCH0
User Rank
Author
re: Do industrial robots contribute to unemployment?
DCH0   6/21/2012 1:42:07 PM
NO RATINGS
Robots are jut part of automation. Assembly that is not automated is generally outsourced to low labor cost countries. The jobs would not remain where they are in any event.



Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
As data rates begin to move beyond 25 Gbps channels, new problems arise. Getting to 50 Gbps channels might not be possible with the traditional NRZ (2-level) signaling. PAM4 lets data rates double with only a small increase in channel bandwidth by sending two bits per symbol. But, it brings new measurement and analysis problems. Signal integrity sage Ransom Stephens will explain how PAM4 differs from NRZ and what to expect in design, measurement, and signal analysis.

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Most Recent Comments
David Ashton
 
rick merritt
 
rick merritt
 
Wilco1
 
KarlS01
 
KarlS01
 
TonyTib
 
perl_geek
 
The MicroMan
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...
The LT®3752/LT3752-1 are current mode PWM controllers ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...