Breaking News
Comments
Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
selinz
User Rank
CEO
re: 50-Gpixel camera is better than the human eye
selinz   6/22/2012 2:11:53 PM
NO RATINGS
Well, the biggest difference in the comparison between optics and network computers is that for the work in tandem to be meaninful, they havce to work synchronously. The good news is that effective shutterspeeds are in the kHz range.

vasanth kumar d
User Rank
Manager
re: 50-Gpixel camera is better than the human eye
vasanth kumar d   6/22/2012 2:38:13 PM
NO RATINGS
Oops...If Mega pixels are sufficient, what added benefit does this bring to a daily family photograph? Watch out memory companies. They would benefit a lot from this more than the end user and the camera manufacturer because remember each Gigapixel photo would take atleast a gigabyte space. What about taking videos with this monster?

wilber_xbox
User Rank
Manager
re: 50-Gpixel camera is better than the human eye
wilber_xbox   6/22/2012 2:54:57 PM
NO RATINGS
"The research team reckons handheld gigapixel cameras could be in use by consumers within five years"...what is the use if human eye cannot differentiate between the picture taken by some Megapixel camera and this monster camera.

chanj0
User Rank
CEO
re: 50-Gpixel camera is better than the human eye
chanj0   6/22/2012 5:30:04 PM
NO RATINGS
Pictures taken by a gigapixel camera can be broken out into small photos. It may be helpful to journalist to get a good snap shot of a situation, e.g. protest or in a battle zone. The question is how to squeeze a 2.5 feet by 20 inches camera into a small form factor. The current size is very difficult to keep into a pocket. ;)

prabhakar_deosthali
User Rank
CEO
re: 50-Gpixel camera is better than the human eye
prabhakar_deosthali   6/23/2012 11:51:08 AM
NO RATINGS
These kind of cameras can be really useful for covering sports events, racing events, and for microscopic work. I guess such cameras will soon become commodity

DrQuine
User Rank
CEO
re: 50-Gpixel camera is better than the human eye
DrQuine   6/24/2012 3:30:14 PM
NO RATINGS
Many cameras are "better than the human eye" using wavelengths to see things that we cannot or magnification to pick up microscopic details or distant features that we cannot resolve. What I see remarkable about this one (which will eventually be miniaturized) is the extraordinary resolution of distant details. Actually there is historical precedent. Traditional film has very high resolution and recently historians have been examining old photographs with microscopes and recovering extraordinary detail from panoramic images. We're going full circle.

DrQuine
User Rank
CEO
re: 50-Gpixel camera is better than the human eye
DrQuine   6/24/2012 3:49:41 PM
NO RATINGS
Sounds like photographic film can still put up a good fight. 50 gigapixels is a square of 224,000 by 224,000 pixels. This could be achieved with a piece of high resolution film [citation below] 2.25 inches by 2.25 inches in an easily portable camera. Large view cameras can achieve extraordinary pixel counts on a wide range of film media. ["Agfa 10E56 holographic film has a resolution of over 4,000 lines/mm—equivalent to a pixel size of 0.125 micrometres—and an active dynamic range of over five orders of magnitude in brightness, compared to typical scientific CCDs that might have pixels of about 10 micrometres and a dynamic range of 3-4 orders of magnitude." - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photographic_film]

Kinnar
User Rank
CEO
re: 50-Gpixel camera is better than the human eye
Kinnar   6/24/2012 7:34:12 PM
NO RATINGS
This is very much true, but to convert these analog images into digital again a very high resolution scanner will be required. It is basically to server the demand of high resolution.

DrQuine
User Rank
CEO
re: 50-Gpixel camera is better than the human eye
DrQuine   6/24/2012 7:53:23 PM
NO RATINGS
There are obvious advantages of digital data for lossless transmission and copying. Nevertheless, for the illustrated application of capturing isolated details of panoramic images for subsequent analysis, the region of interest on the negative could be enlarged, printed, and scanned at any desired resolution. Until the massive digital cameras are practical, current film technology can actually meet the need for Gigapixel image data capture.

Peter Clarke
User Rank
Blogger
re: 50-Gpixel camera is better than the human eye
Peter Clarke   6/25/2012 12:01:52 PM
NO RATINGS
The amount of memory required for storage would go up with the pixel count. And the energy cost of storing and transimitting such images (and such high resolution videos) would also be massive.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

The Best of the Best Videos on YouTube
Max Maxfield
2 comments
A couple of days ago, my chum Paul was visiting me in my office. He'd wandered over from his cubicle in the next bay to take a brief coffee break. This week, Paul had been admiring the ...

Jolt Judges and Andrew Binstock

Jolt Awards: The Best Books
Jolt Judges and Andrew Binstock
1 Comment
As we do every year, Dr. Dobb's recognizes the best books of the last 12 months via the Jolt Awards -- our cycle of product awards given out every two months in each of six categories. No ...

Engineering Investigations

Air Conditioner Falls From Window, Still Works
Engineering Investigations
2 comments
It's autumn in New England. The leaves are turning to red, orange, and gold, my roses are in their second bloom, and it's time to remove the air conditioner from the window. On September ...

David Blaza

The Other Tesla
David Blaza
5 comments
I find myself going to Kickstarter and Indiegogo on a regular basis these days because they have become real innovation marketplaces. As far as I'm concerned, this is where a lot of cool ...