Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 3   >   >>
yalanand
User Rank
Rookie
re: Report: Qualcomm wafer fab not ruled out
yalanand   7/2/2012 11:40:56 AM
NO RATINGS
@goafrit, No doubt having its own fab is helping Intel to succeed but Intel has built the expertise to build and maintain the fabs over years. It would be a herculian task for the qualcomm to build and maintain its own fabs at this stage when technolgy is shrinking so fast.

yalanand
User Rank
Rookie
re: Report: Qualcomm wafer fab not ruled out
yalanand   7/2/2012 11:35:41 AM
NO RATINGS
@Howard, I totally agree with you. It doesnt make sense to build own fab especially when the technology is evolving so rapidly. Let's not forget TI which once held both analog and digital fab's closed down its digital fab's and just retained all the analog fabs.

George Storm
User Rank
Rookie
re: Report: Qualcomm wafer fab not ruled out
George Storm   7/2/2012 10:26:40 AM
NO RATINGS
I had assumed that the reason that Qualcomm was not getting volume from TSMC was that they had tried to minimise financial risk by not pre-booking (sufficient?) capacity. In the event that capacity was under-utilised, this would in the past have allowed Qualcomm to negotiate better prices (it's not really the case if you are sole-sourced, however). If my assumption is correct, this represents at least two major failings in Qualcomm's purchasing strategy - both a misreading of the semiconductor demand/supply cycle, and failure to recognise the implications of single sourcing. I can see no reason that self-supplying would compensate for incorrect prediction (more the reverse, in fact). If there were any business sense in the idea of floating an own-fab it would be as a negotiating ploy - however, the potential suppliers have too much information for it to work. I believe the only possibly "benefit" of Qualcomm's public stance is to avoid excessive fluctuation of the share price - and even this may well misfire.

George Storm
User Rank
Rookie
re: Report: Qualcomm wafer fab not ruled out
George Storm   7/2/2012 10:12:32 AM
NO RATINGS
If Intel fully succeeds in their own terms they will (yet again) drop all foundry business. Their statement that fabless is going nowhere can (should?) be read as an indication that they won't take support of fabless companies seriously.

Fab guy
User Rank
Rookie
re: Report: Qualcomm wafer fab not ruled out
Fab guy   7/2/2012 9:34:16 AM
NO RATINGS
Qualcomm should ask SanDisk or Amkor, two examples that fabless and OSAT tried of getting into the business that they are not familiar with. This may be just a bluffing to tell foundries to get their act together. I think the best bet for Qualcomm is to invest in someone with the capability of 28nm and beyond already, to get their quaranteed capacity. But there are a lot more business consideration and technical, for example, Samsung may be good candidate since QCT still a major supplier to Samsung's cell phone, but not to put all the eggs in basket as one day Samsung may become a competitor as in Apple's case.

resistion
User Rank
CEO
re: Report: Qualcomm wafer fab not ruled out
resistion   7/2/2012 2:17:08 AM
NO RATINGS
So, if Intel is the only one who succeeds at 14 nm, Qualcomm can decide whether to use Intel as foundry, or to replicate Intels' 14 nm on their own.

goafrit
User Rank
Manager
re: Report: Qualcomm wafer fab not ruled out
goafrit   7/2/2012 1:04:58 AM
NO RATINGS
I have said this before. No one can discount the impact of fab in Intel's success. Intel continues to win because its innovations are double-edged. They have process innovation besides all they do with circuits and architecture. If Qualcomm go do same, they may get it right. Yet, it is very expensive and risky.

Luis Sanchez
User Rank
Rookie
re: Report: Qualcomm wafer fab not ruled out
Luis Sanchez   7/1/2012 4:18:34 AM
NO RATINGS
The semiconductor industry is very complex. A lot of IP is involved. The fact that the latest S4 processors are 28 nm based rule out the multi-vendor option. I think if Qualcomm is talking seriously the next logical step is to go for a fab. the question is when is the right time? Also, this would only be to address the shortage of Snapdragon processor? How about other chips from the fabless giant?

resistion
User Rank
CEO
re: Report: Qualcomm wafer fab not ruled out
resistion   6/29/2012 4:21:51 PM
NO RATINGS
If they really want to do this they should wait through 14 nm to see what new technologies are adopted.

JAK620
User Rank
Rookie
re: Report: Qualcomm wafer fab not ruled out
JAK620   6/28/2012 9:27:25 PM
NO RATINGS
Agree but also disagree... Fab processes are not as simple as any typical manufacturing or assembly line. Layout is important but there is tons more into it other than layout. I do not see it as de facto foreign monopoly. Not only the R&D but also the FAB processes are the key assets of IDM's like Intel, Samsung, Miron, IBM, TI,...and the like. For the big-Q, even if they start investing on their own capacity now, FAB mfg is not like making Domino's pizza that all you need is the recipe and ovens. You cannot just buy tools, lay them out in the FAB and start manufacturing wafers

<<   <   Page 2 / 3   >   >>


EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Glen Chenier

Engineers Solve Analog/Digital Problem, Invent Creative Expletives
Glen Chenier
4 comments
An analog engineer and a digital engineer join forces, use their respective skills, and pull a few bunnies out of a hat to troubleshoot a system with which they are completely unfamiliar. ...

Max Maxfield

What's the Best Traveling Toolkit?
Max Maxfield
23 comments
A few years ago at a family Christmas party, I won a pocket knife as part of a "Dirty Santa" game. This little scamp was a Buck 730 X-Tract. In addition to an incredibly strong and sharp ...

Rishabh N. Mahajani, High School Senior and Future Engineer

Future Engineers: Don’t 'Trip Up' on Your College Road Trip
Rishabh N. Mahajani, High School Senior and Future Engineer
10 comments
A future engineer shares his impressions of a recent tour of top schools and offers advice on making the most of the time-honored tradition of the college road trip.

Larry Desjardin

Engineers Should Study Finance: 5 Reasons Why
Larry Desjardin
42 comments
I'm a big proponent of engineers learning financial basics. Why? Because engineers are making decisions all the time, in multiple ways. Having a good financial understanding guides these ...

Top Comments of the Week
Flash Poll
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)