Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 2
junko.yoshida
User Rank
Author
re: Google tries 'Made in the USA'
junko.yoshida   6/30/2012 6:45:43 AM
NO RATINGS
What I didn't understand in the original NY Times article was that Google did not tell the reporter who (which company) is exactly manufacturing this...we know from the story that it is based in the vicinity of Mountain View, Calif. But why all that secrecy?

mcjw
User Rank
Author
re: Google tries 'Made in the USA'
mcjw   6/30/2012 2:08:24 AM
NO RATINGS
So they make a $300 TV accessory that works only with Android where Made in USA is the only saving grace. Wow. Have fun exploiting the American Dream.

R0ckstar
User Rank
Author
re: Google tries 'Made in the USA'
R0ckstar   6/29/2012 8:36:32 PM
NO RATINGS
I am very happy to hear that Google has made this initial effort, and I'm also completely amazed that it's not just superficial PR. This is something that goes a long way toward creating goodwill and a more positive brand image, at least in the eyes of U.S. customers. Many of their customers are also engineers themselves. I think it's an excellent break away from the herd decision that will prove to pay off for them. They didn't have to do it. They could have gone the easy route, but they chose to make the extra effort and I admire that.

george.leopold
User Rank
Author
re: Google tries 'Made in the USA'
george.leopold   6/29/2012 12:38:28 AM
NO RATINGS
Google's decision to manufacturer, repeat, manufacturer, the Nexus Q in the U.S. seems like an honest attempt to begin the process of "reshoring" product manufacturing to the U.S. Maybe this is political, and maybe NYT reporter John Markoff was taken in by Google. But the fact is that we are starting to see more instances of products previously made in China being redesigned and at least being made "production-ready" in the U.S. The Times articles correctly points out that it remains a "trickle," but it may also mean that the offshoring of electronics manufacturing is slowing and the trend will eventually be reversed. I, for one, intend to keep digging on this story.

mcgrathdylan
User Rank
Author
re: Google tries 'Made in the USA'
mcgrathdylan   6/29/2012 12:30:54 AM
NO RATINGS
@Mushroom: Here is an excerpt from the NY Times article: "The Nexus Q, which links a TV or home sound system to the Internet cloud to play video and audio content, contains almost all American-made parts. The engineers who led the effort to build the device, which is based on the same microprocessor used in Android smartphones and contains seven printed circuit boards, found the maker of the zinc metal base in the Midwest and a supplier for the molded plastic components in Southern California." Is every single component made in the U.S.? Probably not, but it appears that Google has made an effort to use all American made parts.

Mushroom in the dark
User Rank
Author
re: Google tries 'Made in the USA'
Mushroom in the dark   6/28/2012 11:36:16 PM
NO RATINGS
Is it really "Made in the USA" or just "Assembled in the USA"? With all the component suppliers located in the Far East this looks more like an election year propaganda rather than a fact. The statement "Made in the USA" should indicate total independence from "out of the US suppliers" rather that transferring back the labor to the US.

DMcCunney
User Rank
Author
re: Google tries 'Made in the USA'
DMcCunney   6/28/2012 7:59:33 PM
NO RATINGS
"It developed the Android operating system to challenge Apple Inc. in wireless handsets," Er, Android was first developed by Android, Inc., beginning in 2003, and the company was bought by Google in 2005. Apple didn't release the iPhone until 2007. So while Android based devices certainly compete with Apple's iPhone, and some folks like to compare iOS vs Android market share, I think it's an error to say Google made Android to challenge Apple. Google bought Android and funded development to have a mobile device OS, and Apple isn't the only thing it competes with.

<<   <   Page 2 / 2


Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
As data rates begin to move beyond 25 Gbps channels, new problems arise. Getting to 50 Gbps channels might not be possible with the traditional NRZ (2-level) signaling. PAM4 lets data rates double with only a small increase in channel bandwidth by sending two bits per symbol. But, it brings new measurement and analysis problems. Signal integrity sage Ransom Stephens will explain how PAM4 differs from NRZ and what to expect in design, measurement, and signal analysis.

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...
The LT®3752/LT3752-1 are current mode PWM controllers ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...