Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Adele.Hars
User Rank
Rookie
re: Ecosystem emerges around new mobile chip tech
Adele.Hars   7/11/2012 10:04:24 PM
NO RATINGS
Indeed it was a great panel -- Chenming Hu of UC Berkeley and inventor of the FD-SOI technology was on it, too.

goafrit
User Rank
Manager
re: Ecosystem emerges around new mobile chip tech
goafrit   7/12/2012 12:23:54 AM
NO RATINGS
I hope this makes real progress. We need alternatives because if not contained, Intel will dominate the industry and set prices without fear of losing markets

Hillol
User Rank
Rookie
re: Ecosystem emerges around new mobile chip tech
Hillol   7/12/2012 12:55:51 AM
NO RATINGS
agree

GroovyGeek
User Rank
CEO
re: Ecosystem emerges around new mobile chip tech
GroovyGeek   7/12/2012 6:59:25 AM
NO RATINGS
And you think the IBM alliance is the answer? IBM lost relevance as a process technology pace-setter at least a decade ago. Mobile chips tend to have slim margins, and the substrates required for FD-SOI are expensive, adding the equivalent of at least one metal layer to the overall price of a chip. I can see why Soitec is pushing this, but I am not aware of a single demonstrated benefit of FD-SOI, and several well documented downsides (self-heating, floating body effects).

SiliconAsia
User Rank
Rookie
re: Ecosystem emerges around new mobile chip tech
SiliconAsia   7/12/2012 3:47:36 PM
NO RATINGS
Agree, This article talks about FDSOI as if Intel never compared this to FinFet or any other process technology options. FDSOI or SOI in general was known to semiconductor for long and its benefits and downsides are well documented. In fact if you ruled out the price/cost factor of SOI, there are other technologies which can deliver much better performance/power than SOI.

Adele.Hars
User Rank
Rookie
re: Ecosystem emerges around new mobile chip tech
Adele.Hars   7/12/2012 4:01:47 PM
NO RATINGS
Since posting this comment, it's been pointed out to me that many people (JP Colinge, D.Flandre, researchers at Hitachi and many more...) did seminal work on fully-depleted/thin body transistors leveraging SOI. We think of this as new, but the industry's been quietly working on this for over 25 years!

the_floating_ gate
User Rank
Rookie
re: Ecosystem emerges around new mobile chip tech
the_floating_ gate   7/12/2012 5:12:42 PM
NO RATINGS
Of course Intel looked at SOI...and Bohr even agrees that some will use SOI but based on Intel's evaluation they rejected it. 4/16/2012 7:29 PM EDT Mark Bohr addresses SOI versus bulk One on One with M. Bohr http://semimd.com/blog/2011/07/14/one-on-one-with-mark-bohr/

the_floating_ gate
User Rank
Rookie
re: Ecosystem emerges around new mobile chip tech
the_floating_ gate   7/12/2012 5:20:38 PM
NO RATINGS
"IBM lost relevance as a process technology pace-setter at least a decade ago." 10 years ago IBM screwed up big time pushing SOG (SiLK)in conjunction with copper interconnect. UMC licensed the technology from IBM but dropped it because they figured out SiLK was not working. And now gate first debacle - it's good for one node...

Stanley_
User Rank
Rookie
re: Ecosystem emerges around new mobile chip tech
Stanley_   7/13/2012 2:15:38 PM
NO RATINGS
"While Intel’s FinFET approach is not expected to enter production until the chip giant rolls out its 14-nm process technology" Isn't it true that Ivy Bridge is using 22nm Tri-Gate, and already in market?

chanj0
User Rank
CEO
re: Ecosystem emerges around new mobile chip tech
chanj0   7/14/2012 10:05:59 PM
NO RATINGS
A consortium for better mobile processor makes total sense. One of the many keys solution of reducing power consumption is by achieving complete integration. There may be more than 1 consortia formed due to competitive and political reasons. If it is acceptable to the industry, 1 is always better than multiple. Nonetheless, the industry and market will drive the direction. An interesting comment from Moore, "the current infrastructure works out to roughly one server to deliver content to 600 smartphones" I believe it depends on the kind of server and memory capacity. In addition, the type of services will affect the number of smartphones, or in general, mobile devices a server can deal with. To my experience, a dual Xeon with 128GB of memory shall be able to deal with thousands of simultaneous connections. If Moore is talking about ARM based servers, I have no doubt improvement is necessary.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Most Recent Comments
Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Are Today's Designs Bound by the Constraints of Yesteryear?
Max Maxfield
26 comments
As part of my ongoing Pedagogical and Phantasmagorical Inamorata Prognostication Engine project (try saying that 10 times quickly), I'm working with Jason Dueck from Instrument Meter ...

Jolt Judges and Andrew Binstock

Jolt Awards: The Best Books
Jolt Judges and Andrew Binstock
1 Comment
As we do every year, Dr. Dobb's recognizes the best books of the last 12 months via the Jolt Awards -- our cycle of product awards given out every two months in each of six categories. No ...

Engineering Investigations

Air Conditioner Falls From Window, Still Works
Engineering Investigations
2 comments
It's autumn in New England. The leaves are turning to red, orange, and gold, my roses are in their second bloom, and it's time to remove the air conditioner from the window. On September ...

David Blaza

The Other Tesla
David Blaza
5 comments
I find myself going to Kickstarter and Indiegogo on a regular basis these days because they have become real innovation marketplaces. As far as I'm concerned, this is where a lot of cool ...